RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-123934
Development of an external-to-internal convertible endoscopic biliary drainage device – a preliminary prospective feasibility study
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 17. August 2017
accepted after revision 15. November 2017
Publikationsdatum:
16. Januar 2018 (online)

Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for a malignant stricture in the bile duct has some advantages over endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS). However, ENBD may cause nasopharyngeal discomfort. We developed an external-to-internal convertible endoscopic biliary drainage (ETI-EBD) device that enables both internal and external drainage to occur during a single endoscopy.
Patients and methods This device consists of three parts, comprising a 5-Fr ENBD tube (250 cm) (ENBD-t), an 8.5-Fr EBS tube (7 cm) (EBS-t), and an 8-Fr pusher tube for EBS (230 cm) (P-t). The EBS-t is mounted over the ENBD-t at the distal end of the ENBD-t. The P-t is also placed over the ENBD-t. After an endoscopic sphincterotomy, the EBS-t of the device is inserted into the papilla, then the duodenal endoscope is withdrawn, leaving the device in place. After ENBD, only the ENBD-t was withdrawn from the P-t. At this point, the EBS-t was isolated and left without endoscopy or radiography.
Results ETI-EBD was successfully placed in all consecutive 21 patients (100 %). The release of EBS-t from ENBD-t wit was successfully completed in 19 patients (90.5 %). There were 4 patients with kink of P-t when exchanging this device from the mouth to the nose. It was difficult for 2 patients to withdraw the ENBD-t because of poor lubrication performance. There were no significant complications associated with the use of the device.
Conclusion This device allows for both external and internal biliary drainage with a single endoscopy.
-
References
- 1 Yagioka H, Hirano K, Isayama H. et al. Clinical significance of bile cytology via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube for pathological diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011; 18: 211-215
- 2 Lin H, Li S, Liu X. The safety and efficacy of nasobiliary drainage versus biliary stenting in malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e5253
- 3 Welsh FK, Ramsden CW, MacLennan K. et al. Increased intestinal permeability and altered mucosal immunity in cholestatic jaundice. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 205-212
- 4 Kamiya S, Nagino M, Kanazawa H. et al. The value of bile replacement during external biliary drainage: an analysis of intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 510-517
- 5 Uchida N, Ezaki T, Fukuma H. et al. Conversion of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage to internal drainage by means of endoscopic scissor forceps. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 180
- 6 Uchida N, Tsutsui H, Ezaki T. et al. Conversion from external nasobiliary drainage to internal drainage using endoscopically available scissor forceps. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50: 1891-1893