Remote Robotic Surgery and Virtual Education Platforms: How Advanced Surgical Technologies Can Increase Access to Surgical Care in Resource-Limited Settings

Abstract

Advanced surgical technologies consist of remote and virtual platforms that facilitate surgical care and education. It also includes the infrastructure necessary to utilize these platforms (e.g., internet access, robotic systems, and simulators). Given that 5 billion people lack access to safe and timely surgical care, the appeal of these technologies to the field of global surgery lies primarily in its ability to eliminate geographical barriers and address surgeon shortages. This article discusses the use of virtual and remote technologies in resource-limited settings, the potential applications of these technologies, the possible barriers to their integration, and the impact these technologies may have on access to surgical care and education. Specifically, it will explore how robotic surgery, telesurgery, virtual education platforms, and simulations have the potential to be instrumental in enhancing worldwide access to safe surgical care.

Keywords

telesurgery - robotic surgery - telementoring - resource-limited settings

Publication History

Article published online:
30 July 2023

• References

• 1 Dare AJ, Grimes CE, Gillies R. et al. Global surgery: defining an emerging global health field. Lancet 2014; 384 (9961) 2245-2247
• 2 Aliu O, Corlew SD, Heisler ME, Pannucci CJ, Chung KC. Building surgical capacity in low-resource countries: a qualitative analysis of task shifting from surgeon volunteers' perspectives. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (01) 108-112
• 3 Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract 2021; 17 (02) 218-221
• 4 McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB. et al; Balliol Collaboration. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374 (9695) 1105-1112
• 5 Park KM, Rashidian N, Anderson C. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the use of virtual surgical education pertaining to the domains of cognition and curriculum, psychomotor skills training, and faculty development and mentorship. Ann Surg 2022; 276 (01) e6-e15
• 6 Corriero AC, Silva Correia IF, Park KB, Kinnear J, Miranda BH. Evaluating the impact of a virtual international global surgery conference as a means for global surgery and health education. Heliyon 2022; 8 (12) e11842
• 7 Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery. Br J Surg 2015; 102 (02) e15-e28
• 8 Choi PJ, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. Telesurgery: past, present, and future. Cureus 2018; 10 (05) e2716
• 9 Gandaglia G, Ghani KR, Sood A. et al. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (10) 1039-1044
• 10 Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R. Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (01) 1-10
• 11 Ullrich PJ, Ramsey MD. Global plastic surgery: a review of the field and a call for virtual training in low- and middle-income countries. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2023; 31 (02) 118-125
• 12 Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN. eds. Disease Control Priorities. Vol. 1: Essential Surgery. 3rd ed.. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2015
• 13 Wilkinson E, Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Brown J, Jayne D. Barriers to training in laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Trop Doct 2021; 51 (03) 408-414
• 14 Tamalvanan V. Foreseeable challenges in developing telesurgery for low income and middle-income countries. Int Surg J. 2021; 8 (10) 3228
• 15 Barba P, Stramiello J, Funk EK, Richter F, Yip MC, Orosco RK. Remote telesurgery in humans: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36 (05) 2771-2777
• 16 Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, Perrenot C, Felblinger J, Hubert J. Effect of latency training on surgical performance in simulated robotic telesurgery procedures. Int J Med Robot 2015; 11 (03) 290-295
• 17 Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills SD. et al. Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS 2014; 18 (04) e2014.00230
• 18 Schlachta CM, Nguyen NT, Ponsky T, Dunkin B. Project 6 Summit: SAGES telementoring initiative. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (09) 3665-3672
• 19 Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA. et al. A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 2015; 116 (02) 302-308
• 20 Raison N, Khan MS, Challacombe B. Telemedicine in surgery: what are the opportunities and hurdles to realising the potential?. Curr Urol Rep 2015; 16 (07) 43
• 21 Smith R, Patel V, Satava R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 2014; 10 (03) 379-384
• 22 Stawicki SP, Nwomeh BC, Peck GL. et al; American College of Academic International Medicine Consensus Group on International Medical Programs. Training and accrediting international surgeons. Br J Surg 2019; 106 (02) e27-e33
• 23 Mehta A, Cheng Ng J, Andrew Awuah W. et al. Embracing robotic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: potential benefits, challenges, and scope in the future. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 84: 104803