Coupling Reaction of Aryl Halides with Orthoformate Ester

Abstract

Herein, we report that orthoformate ester and N,N-dimethylformamide di-tert-butyl acetal can be a source of alkoxy radicals. We have developed a coupling reaction with aryl halides as a way of utilizing them. This has led to the synthesis of aromatic ethers with tertiary alkoxy groups, which are generally considered difficult to synthesize.

Key word

C–O bond formation - hydrogen atom transfer - tertiary alkoxy group - photoredox reaction

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 24. September 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 08. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. November 2024

• References and Notes

• 1a Majetich G, Wheless K. Tetrahedron 1995; 51: 7095
• 1b Hartung J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 4: 619
• 1c Walling C, Wagner PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964; 86: 3368
• 1d Salamone M, Bietti M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015; 48: 2895
• 1e Wu X, Wang M, Huna L, Wang D, Wang J, Zhu C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 1640
• 2a Barthelemy A, Tuccio B, Maginer E, Dagousset G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 13790
• 2b Banoun C, Bourdreux F, Magnier E, Dagousset G. Org. Lett. 2021; 23: 8926
• 2c Barthelemy A, Tuccio B, Madier E, Dagousset G. Synlett 2019; 30: 1489
• 3 Yayla HG, Wang H, Tarantino KT, Orbe HS, Knowles RR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 10794
• 4 Guo J, Hu A, Chen Y, Sun J, Tang H, Zuo Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 15319

Already reported methods for the formation of alkoxy radicals, see:
• 5a Chang L, An Q, Duan L, Feng K, Zuo Z. Chem. Rev. 2022; 122: 2429
• 5b Tsui E, Wang H, Knowls RR. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 11124
• 5c Kim I, Park B, Kang G, Kim J, Lee H, Baik M, Hong S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018; 57: 15517

Methyl esterification of aldehydes with trimethyl orthoformate, see:
• 6a Jiang B, Xu B, Wang M, Li Z, Liu D, Zhang S. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018; 7: 977

Methyl esterification of aldehydes with trimethyl orthoformate, see:
• 6b Rhee H, Kim JY. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 1365

Trimethyl orthoformate is used as a methyl radical source, see:
• 6c Kariofillis SK, Shields BJ, Tekle-Smith MA, Zacuto MJ, Doyle AG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 7683
• 7 For additional information and control experiments, see the Supporting Information.
• 8 Uoyama H, Goushi K, Shizu K, Nomura H, Adachi C. Nature 2012; 492: 234
• 9a Parasram M, Shields BJ, Ahmad O, Knauber T, Doyle AG. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 5821
• 9b Luo J, Zhang J. ACS Catal. 2016; 6: 873
• 9c Speckmeier E, Fischer TG, Zeitler K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018; 140: 15353
• 10a Jeffrey JL, Terrett JA, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2015; 349: 1532
• 10b Zhang X, MacMillan DW. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 11353
• 11a Zuo Z, Ahneman DT, Chu L, Terrett JA, Doyle AG, MacMillan DW. C. Science 2014; 345: 437
• 11b Huang L, Zhu C, Yi L, Yue H, Kancherla R, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 457
• 12a Nishino S, Sudo K, Kurahashi T. Org. Lett. 2024; 26: 4049
• 12b Nishino S, Kurahashi T. Chem. Lett. 2024; 53: upae088
• 12c Nishino S, Kurahashi T. Chem. Lett. 2024; 53: upae111
• 12d Du X, Cheng-Sánchez I, Nevado C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023; 145: 12532
• 12e Lv P, Wang A, Xie X, Chen Y, Liu Y. Org. Lett. 2023; 25: 3319
• 12f Huang L, Zhu C, Yi L, Yue H, Kancherla R, Rueping M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020; 59: 457
• 13 Noble A, McCarver J, MacMillan DW. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 624
• 14 Shields BJ, Doyle AG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 12719
• 15 For additional information and control experiments, see the Supporting Information.
• 16 For additional information and control experiments, see the Supporting Information.
• 17 Khramtsov V, Berliner LJ, Clanton TL. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2001; 30: 1099
• 18 Terrett JA, Cuthbertson JD, Shurtleff VW, MacMillan DW. C. Nature 2015; 524: 330
• 19 Cavedon C, Madani A, Seeberger PH, Pieber B. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 5331
• 20 Kibriya G, Samanta S, Luna S, Mondal S, Halra A. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 13722
• 21 Luo Z, Lu C, Histand G, Lin D. J. Org. Chem. 2022; 87: 11558
• 22 General Procedure for 3a In the glovebox, a 5 mL glass vial, equipped with a Teflon stir bar, was charged with NiBr₂·glyme (15.5 mg, 50.0 μmol, 0.100 equiv), dtbbpy (20.2 mg, 75.0 μmol, 0.150 equiv), and trimethyl orthoformate (5.00 mL). The nickel catalyst solution was stirred for 20 min, forming a green suspension. To a separate 5 mL glass vial, equipped with a Teflon stir bar, was added 4CzIPN (11.8 mg, 15.0 μmol, 0.0300 equiv) and trimethyl orthoformate (3.00 mL). The photoredox catalyst solution was stirred for 10 min. Meanwhile, a 12 mL borosilicate reaction tube with a Teflon stir bar was charged with methyl 4-bromobenzoate (215 mg, 0.500 mmol), K₃PO₄ (212 mg, 1.00 mmol, 2.00 equiv), quinuclidine (5.50 mg, 50.0 μmol, 0.100 equiv), and trimethyl orthoformate (2.00 mL). The photocatalyst solution and nickel catalyst solutions were then added sequentially (total solvent volume: 10.0 mL, 50.0 μM). The reaction tube was capped with a Teflon septum cap, sealed with electrical tape, and removed from the glovebox. The reaction was stirred for 20 h while illuminating with 427 nm Kessil LED lump placed horizontally at 2 cm distances on either side of the reaction tube (Scheme S1 and S2). Upon completion, the reaction mixture was filtered through Celite and washed with dichloromethane. The residue was purified by column chromatography (20 cm × 300 cm, SiO₂ 60g, hexane/ethyl acetate = 10/1). Compound 3a: yield 77%, colorless solid. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 7.99–8.01 (d, J = 8.93 Hz, 2 H), 6.91–6.93 (d, J = 8.93 Hz, 2 H) 3.89 (s, 3 H), 3.86 (s, 3 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 167.0, 163.4, 131.7, 122.7, 113.7, 55.5, 52.0 ppm. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₉H₁₁O₃: 167.0708; found: 167.0692.