Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788033
Original Article

Employing Computed Tomography to Assess Clavicle Symmetry in Healthy Adults in the Indian Population of Dakshina Karnataka

Mustapha Alhaji Barde 
1   Department of Medical Radiography, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria
2   Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India
,
Dolly A. Sharma 
3   Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Bapubhai Desaibhai Patel Institute of Paramedical Sciences (BDIPS), Charotar University of Science and Technology (CHARUSAT) University, Changa, Gujarat, India
,
Sushil Yadav 
4   Department of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions (MCHP), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The S-shaped collar bone lies horizontally at the root of the neck and is one of the most common bones to fracture. The symmetry of the clavicle bone differs between males and females, so the present study was conducted to assess the symmetry of the clavicle in healthy adults of the Indian population in the Dakshina Karnataka region.

Methods The data for this cross-sectional study were retrospectively collected from 138 adult patients who all underwent chest computed tomography (CT) for clinical reasons. Patients younger than 18 years and those with bony fractures, trauma, or other deformities were excluded. Axial chest CT images were used to trace the anatomy of the clavicle. The curved planar reconstruction technique was used to trace the maximum length of the bilateral clavicle.

Results There were 138 patients of both sexes. Patients ranged in age from 20 to 80 years. The chi-square test was used to investigate whether sex and clavicle symmetry were related. In women, bilateral symmetry and asymmetry were 42.5 and 41.2%, respectively, while in men, they were 57.5 and 58.8%, respectively; hence, there was no significant correlation (p-value = 0.877) between clavicle symmetry and sex. A linear-by-linear association test was performed to ascertain the relationship between the variance in clavicle symmetry and age. It was noted that 51 individuals had asymmetry and 87 had symmetry. The patients were further divided into three age groups. There were 34, 67, and 37 individuals in the 20 to 40, 41 to 60, and 61 to 80 years age groups, respectively. Clavicle symmetry was 27.6% in the 20 to 40 and 61 to 80 age groups and 44.8% in the 41 to 60 age group. The percentages of asymmetry were 19.6, 54.9, and 25.5% in the 20 to 40, 41 to 60, and 61 to 80 years age groups, respectively, with no correlation between age and clavicle length symmetry (p-value = 0.643).

Conclusion Regardless of age or sex, the population under study had symmetric clavicles. As a result, the assumption of symmetry may be accepted in some clinical scenarios, such as simple fractures, but caution should be exercised when designing fixatives and surgical cases.

Keywords

curved planar reconstruction - multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) - bone symmetry


Publication History

Article published online:
29 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Kumar R, Madewell JE, Swischuk LE, Lindell MM, David R. The clavicle: normal and abnormal. Radiographics 1989; 9 (04) 677-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Shirley NR. Age and Sex estimation from the Human: An investigation of traditional and novel approach. University of Tennessee, Knoxville; 2009: 01-10
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Gakhar GK, Gupta V, Jasuja OP, Khandelwal N. Determining the Ossification Status of Sternal End of the Clavicle using CT and Digital X-ray: A Comparative Study. J Forensic Res 2014;5(223):
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Stull KE, Tise ML, Ali Z, Fowler DR. Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 238: 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Smekal V, Deml C, Irenberger A. et al. Length determination in midshaft clavicle fractures: validation of measurement. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (07) 458-462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Walters J, Solomons S, Roche S. A morphometric study of the clavicle. South African Orthopaed J 2010; 9 (03) 47-52
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Cunningham BP, McLaren A, Richardson M, McLemore R. Clavicular length: the assumption of symmetry. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (03) e343-e347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 King PR, Scheepers S, Ikram A. Anatomy of the clavicle and its medullary canal: a computed tomography study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (01) 37-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kaur H, Harjeet DS, Jit I. Length and curves of the clavicle in Northwest Indians. J Anat Soc India 2002; 51 (02) 199-209
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Khaleel N, Jayachandra PT, Shaik HS, Khalid B, Mohammad A. Morphometry of clavicle. J Pharm Sci 2014; 6 (02) 112-114
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Auerbach BM, Raxter MH. Patterns of clavicular bilateral asymmetry in relation to the humerus: variation among humans. J Hum Evol 2008; 54 (05) 663-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Trinkaus E, Holliday TW, Auerbach BM. Neandertal clavicle length. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111 (12) 4438-4442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bernat A, Huysmans T, Van Glabbeek F, Sijbers J, Gielen J, Van Tongel A. The anatomy of the clavicle: a three-dimensional cadaveric study. Clin Anat 2014; 27 (05) 712-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar