Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · European Journal of General Dentistry
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788256
Original Article

The Effect of Micromechanical Surface Preparation and Adhesive Surface Modification Strategies on Resin-Matrix Ceramic Repair Bond Strength Using Universal Adhesive Containing Silane Agent

Awiruth Klaisiri
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Apichai Maneenacarith
1   Division of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
,
Tool Sriamporn
2   Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by the Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University Research Fund.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This research assesses the effect of the different micromechanical surface preparations and chemically adhesive surface modification strategies applied to resin-matrix ceramics (Shofu Block HC) repaired using resin composites.

Materials and Methods Eighty resin-matrix ceramics were conducted and designed into eight groups of 10 specimens and surface treated with (1) micromechanical preparation with sandblast (SB) or hydrofluoric acid (HF), and (2) chemically adhesive techniques with HC primer (HC) and/or silane (Si) and/or conventional adhesive (AD) or universal adhesive (UA) designing are as follows: group 1, SB + HC; group 2, SB + HC + AD; group 3, SB + HC + Si + AD; group 4, SB + HC + UA; group 5, HF + HC; group 6, HF + HC + AD; group 7, HF + HC + Si + AD; and group 8, HF + HC + UA. An ultradent model was put on the specimen center, then filled resin composite. Mechanical testing instrument was used to determine the samples' microshear bond strength (MSBS). To inspect failure modes, a stereomicroscope was used for observing the debonded surfaces.

Statistical Analysis To assess the data, a one-way analysis of variance was employed, and the significant level (p < 0.05) was established with Tukey's test.

Results Group 3 (29.29 ± 2.58 MPa) and group 4 (28.34 ± 1.26 MPa) demonstrated the two maximum MSBS values. The minimum MSBS (10.02 ± 3.31 MPa) was discovered by group 5. Nevertheless, group 2's MSBS values (22.78 ± 2.44 MPa) differed significantly from the values for groups 3 and 4. All the fractured samples in groups 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 had an adhesive failure pattern. Furthermore, group 3 presented the greatest mixed failures (40%).

Conclusion The SB is the most effective protocol for producing micromechanical retention. The application of HC primer and Si agent prior to the adhesive agent is the best chemical adhesive strategy for sandblasted resin-matrix ceramic surfaces. Additionally, the application of HC primer before the use of UA containing acid-resistant Si is the best alternative chemical adhesive strategy for improving the MSBS.

Keywords

adhesive agent - hybrid ceramic - repair bond strength - surface treatment


Publication History

Article published online:
25 September 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Bajraktarova-Valjakova E, Korunoska-Stevkovska V, Kapusevska B, Gigovski N, Bajraktarova-Misevska C, Grozdanov A. Contemporary dental ceramic materials, a review: chemical composition, physical and mechanical properties, indications for use. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6 (09) 1742-1755
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Aslan YU, Coskun E, Ozkan Y, Dard M. Clinical evaluation of three types of CAD/CAM inlay/onlay materials after 1-year clinical follow up. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019; 27 (03) 131-140
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Coşkun E, Aslan YU, Özkan YK. Evaluation of two different CAD-CAM inlay-onlays in a split-mouth study: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32 (02) 244-250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Limsiriwong W, Klaisiri A, Krajangta N. Effect of anti-COVID-19 mouthwashes on shear bond strength of resin-matrix ceramics repaired with resin composite using universal adhesive: an in vitro study. J Funct Biomater 2023; 14 (03) 158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Fasbinder DJ, Neiva GF. Surface evaluation of polishing techniques for new resilient CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28 (01) 56-66
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res 2018; 97 (10) 1082-1091
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Fathy H, Hamama HH, El-Wassefy N, Mahmoud SH. Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2022; 26 (05) 3807-3822
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Carrabba M, Vichi A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Comparison of traditional and simplified methods for repairing CAD/CAM feldspathic ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2017; 9 (04) 257-264
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM. Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent 2017; 42 (04) 367-374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kilinc H, Sanal FA, Turgut S. Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont 2020; 12 (05) 273-282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Turunç-Oğuzman R, Şişmanoğlu S. Influence of surface treatments and adhesive protocols on repair bond strength of glass-matrix and resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics. J Esthet Restor Dent 2023; 35 (08) 1322-1331
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Chen B, Lu Z, Meng H. et al. Effectiveness of pre-silanization in improving bond performance of universal adhesives or self-adhesive resin cements to silica-based ceramics: chemical and in vitro evidences. Dent Mater 2019; 35 (04) 543-553
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Leelaponglit S, Maneenacarith A, Wutikhun T, Klaisiri A. The various silane agents in universal adhesives on repair strength of resin composite to resin composite. J Compos Sci 2023; 7 (01) 7
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A. et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 (01) 178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Avram LT, Galațanu SV, Opriș C, Pop C, Jivănescu A. Effect of different etching times with hydrofluoric acid on the bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramic material. Materials (Basel) 2022; 15 (20) 7071
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Klaisiri A, Maneenacarith A, Jirathawornkul N, Suthamprajak P, Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N. The effect of multiple applications of phosphate-containing primer on shear bond strength between zirconia and resin composite. Polymers (Basel) 2022; 14 (19) 4174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ozcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dündar M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16 (01) 15-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Sismanoglu S, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Erten-Taysi A, Ercal P. Influence of different surface treatments and universal adhesives on the repair of CAD-CAM composite resins: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 124 (02) 238.e1-238.e9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Strasser T, Preis V, Behr M, Rosentritt M. Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22 (08) 2787-2797
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 El-Damanhoury HM, A Elsahn N, Sheela S, Gaintantzopoulou MD. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks:Er:YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res 2021; 65 (02) 225-234
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Yang B, Wolfart S, Scharnberg M, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Influence of contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2007; 86 (08) 749-753
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Park JH, Choi YS. Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016; 8 (04) 275-284
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hagino R, Mine A, Kawaguchi-Uemura A. et al. Adhesion procedures for CAD/CAM indirect resin composite block: a new resin primer versus a conventional silanizing agent. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 64 (03) 319-325
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Sresthadatta P, Sriamporn T, Klaisiri A, Thamrongananskul N. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin cement to hybrid ceramic materials. J Int Dent Med Res 2021; 14 (01) 125-135
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Prabriputaloong S, Krajangta N, Klaisiri A. The effect of different chemical surface treatments on the bond strength of resin-matrix ceramic repaired with resin composite. Eur J Dent 2024;
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Klaisiri A, Maneenacarith A, Krajangta N. et al. Surface modification methods of self-cured acrylic resin repaired with resin composite using a universal adhesive. J Compos Sci 2023; 7 (09) 360
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Klaisiri A, Krajangta N, Thamrongananskul N. The durability of zirconia/resin composite shear bond strength using different functional monomer of universal adhesives. Eur J Dent 2022; 16 (04) 756-760
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 da Silva PNF, Martinelli-Lobo CM, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Valandro LF. Bond strength between a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and a composite for repair: effect of several ceramic surface treatments. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Yao C, Yu J, Wang Y, Tang C, Huang C. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives. Dent Mater 2018; 34 (05) 809-818
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar