Semin Neurol 2025; 45(01): 099-111
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791769
Review Article

Top 10 Clinical Pearls in Paraproteinemic Neuropathies

Benjamin Becker
1   Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Amro Stino
1   Division of Neuromuscular Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Paraproteinemic neuropathies represent an important subset of peripheral neuropathies. Once identified, further evaluation into the paraproteinemic subtype, clinical exam pattern, and electrodiagnostic phenotype helps clarify if the paraproteinemia is coincidental or causal of the neuropathy, as not all paraproteinemias cause neuropathy. Of all paraproteinemias, immunoglobulin M (IgM)-associated peripheral neuropathy, or IgM neuropathy, is of particular importance as half of IgM neuropathies also harbor anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies, which produce a characteristic demyelinating pattern on nerve conduction testing. Immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A paraproteinemias are less strongly associated with peripheral neuropathy, except in the setting of multiple myeloma or osteosclerotic myeloma (POEMS syndrome), which have characteristic systemic features. In multiple myeloma, chemotherapy is more likely to result in neuropathy than the myeloma itself. Finally, the presence of systemic features (e.g., cardiomyopathy, nephropathy, recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, and autonomic insufficiency) should raise concern for hereditary or acquired light (AL) chain amyloidosis. AL amyloidosis can occur in the setting of any light or heavy chain paraproteinemia. Central to the proper evaluation of paraproteinemic neuropathy is electrodiagnostic testing, which helps delineate axonal versus demyelinating paraproteinemic neuropathy, the latter often misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Rison RA, Beydoun SR. Paraproteinemic neuropathy: a practical review. BMC Neurol 2016; 16: 13
  • 2 Saleun JP, Vicariot M, Deroff P, Morin JF. Monoclonal gammopathies in the adult population of Finistère, France. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35 (01) 63-68
  • 3 Crawford J, Eye MK, Cohen HJ. Evaluation of monoclonal gammopathies in the “well” elderly. Am J Med 1987; 82 (01) 39-45
  • 4 Bharucha NE, Bharucha AE, Bharucha EP. Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in the Parsi community of Bombay. Neurology 1991; 41 (08) 1315-1317
  • 5 Savettieri G, Rocca WA, Salemi G. et al; Sicilian Neuro-Epidemiologic Study (SNES) Group. Prevalence of diabetic neuropathy with somatic symptoms: a door-to-door survey in two Sicilian municipalities. Neurology 1993; 43 (06) 1115-1120
  • 6 Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care 2011; 34 (10) 2220-2224
  • 7 Beghi EM. Italian General Practitioner Study Group (IGPSG). Chronic symmetric symptomatic polyneuropathy in the elderly: a field screening investigation in two Italian regions. I. Prevalence and general characteristics of the sample. Neurology 1995; 45 (10) 1832-1836
  • 8 Kelly Jr JJ, Kyle RA, O'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Prevalence of monoclonal protein in peripheral neuropathy. Neurology 1981; 31 (11) 1480-1483
  • 9 Callaghan BC, Kerber KA, Lisabeth LL. et al. Role of neurologists and diagnostic tests on the management of distal symmetric polyneuropathy. JAMA Neurol 2014; 71 (09) 1143-1149
  • 10 Rajabally YA. Neuropathy and paraproteins: review of a complex association. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18 (11) 1291-1298
  • 11 Van den Bergh PYK, van Doorn PA, Hadden RDM. et al. European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint Task Force-Second revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2021; 26 (03) 242-268
  • 12 Koike H, Katsuno M. Paraproteinemia and neuropathy. Neurol Sci 2021; 42 (11) 4489-4501
  • 13 Beydoun SR, Darki L. Paraproteinemic neuropathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2023; 29 (05) 1492-1513
  • 14 Gosselin S, Kyle RA, Dyck PJ. Neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Ann Neurol 1991; 30 (01) 54-61
  • 15 Naddaf E, Mauermann ML. Peripheral neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2020; 26 (05) 1369-1383
  • 16 Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV. et al. Long-term follow-up of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2003; 102 (10) 3759-3764
  • 17 Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15 (12) e538-e548
  • 18 Kyle RA, Larson DR, Therneau TM. et al. Long-term follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (03) 241-249
  • 19 International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003; 121 (05) 749-757
  • 20 Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV. et al; International Myeloma Working Group. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010; 24 (06) 1121-1127
  • 21 Ríos-Tamayo R, Paiva B, Lahuerta JJ, López JM, Duarte RF. Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance: a critical appraisal. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (21) 5247
  • 22 Go RS, Rajkumar SV. How I manage monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2018; 131 (02) 163-173
  • 23 Neil HA, Thompson AV, John S, McCarthy ST, Mann JI. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy: the prevalence of impaired heart rate variability in a geographically defined population. Diabet Med 1989; 6 (01) 20-24
  • 24 Berenson JR, Anderson KC, Audell RA. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a consensus statement. Br J Haematol 2010; 150 (01) 28-38
  • 25 Bird J, Behrens J, Westin J. et al; Haemato-oncology Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology, UK Myeloma Forum and Nordic Myeloma Study Group. UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG): guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M-proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Br J Haematol 2009; 147 (01) 22-42
  • 26 van de Donk NW, Palumbo A, Johnsen HE. et al; European Myeloma Network. The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network. Haematologica 2014; 99 (06) 984-996
  • 27 England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G. et al; American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. PM R 2009; 1 (01) 5-13
  • 28 Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G. et al; International Myeloma Working Group. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009; 23 (02) 215-224
  • 29 Kahn SN, Bina M. Sensitivity of immunofixation electrophoresis for detecting IgM paraproteins in serum. Clin Chem 1988; 34 (08) 1633-1635
  • 30 Willrich MAV, Murray DL, Kyle RA. Laboratory testing for monoclonal gammopathies: focus on monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. Clin Biochem 2018; 51: 38-47
  • 31 Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, Benson J. et al. Screening panels for detection of monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem 2009; 55 (08) 1517-1522
  • 32 Katzmann JA, Abraham RS, Dispenzieri A, Lust JA, Kyle RA. Diagnostic performance of quantitative kappa and lambda free light chain assays in clinical practice. Clin Chem 2005; 51 (05) 878-881
  • 33 Long TE, Indridason OS, Palsson R. et al. Defining new reference intervals for serum free light chains in individuals with chronic kidney disease: results of the iStopMM study. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12 (09) 133
  • 34 Ramchandren S, Lewis RA. An update on monoclonal gammopathy and neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2012; 12 (01) 102-110
  • 35 Yeung KB, Thomas PK, King RH. et al. The clinical spectrum of peripheral neuropathies associated with benign monoclonal IgM, IgG and IgA paraproteinaemia. Comparative clinical, immunological and nerve biopsy findings. J Neurol 1991; 238 (07) 383-391
  • 36 Nobile-Orazio E, Barbieri S, Baldini L. et al. Peripheral neuropathy in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: prevalence and immunopathogenetic studies. Acta Neurol Scand 1992; 85 (06) 383-390
  • 37 Carroll AS, Lunn MPT. Paraproteinaemic neuropathy: MGUS and beyond. Pract Neurol 2021; 21 (06) 492-503
  • 38 Chow F, Darki L, Beydoun SR. The challenge of distinguishing POEMS from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy - importance of early recognition and diagnosis of POEMS. US Neurol 2018; 14 (02) 94-97
  • 39 Nasu S, Misawa S, Sekiguchi Y. et al. Different neurological and physiological profiles in POEMS syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83 (05) 476-479
  • 40 Lupu VD, Mora CA, Dambrosia J, Meer J, Dalakas M, Floeter MK. Terminal latency index in neuropathy with antibodies against myelin-associated glycoproteins. Muscle Nerve 2007; 35 (02) 196-202
  • 41 Cocito D, Isoardo G, Ciaramitaro P. et al. Terminal latency index in polyneuropathy with IgM paraproteinemia and anti-MAG antibody. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24 (10) 1278-1282
  • 42 Mathis S, Magy L, Diallo L, Boukhris S, Vallat JM. Amyloid neuropathy mimicking chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45 (01) 26-31
  • 43 Tozza S, Severi D, Spina E. et al. The neuropathy in hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: a narrative review. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2021; 26 (02) 155-159
  • 44 Klein CJ, Moon JS, Mauermann ML. et al. The neuropathies of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) and IgM-MGUS. Can J Neurol Sci 2011; 38 (02) 289-295
  • 45 Kapoor P, Rajkumar SV. Current approach to Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Blood Rev 2023; 62: 101129
  • 46 Le Cann M, Bouhour F, Viala K. et al. CANOMAD: a neurological monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance that benefits from B-cell-targeted therapies. Blood 2020; 136 (21) 2428-2436
  • 47 Garcia-Santibanez R, Zaidman CM, Sommerville RB. et al. CANOMAD and other chronic ataxic neuropathies with disialosyl antibodies (CANDA). J Neurol 2018; 265 (06) 1402-1409
  • 48 Steck AJ, Stalder AK, Renaud S. Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol 2006; 19 (05) 458-463
  • 49 Pruppers MHJ, Merkies ISJ, Lunn MPT, Notermans NC. IMAGiNe Study Group. 230th ENMC International Workshop: Improving future assessment and research in IgM anti-MAG peripheral neuropathy: a consensus collaborative effort, Naarden, the Netherlands, 24-26 February 2017. Neuromuscul Disord 2017; 27 (11) 1065-1072
  • 50 Vallat JM, Magy L, Sindou P, Magdelaine C, Cros D. IgG neuropathy: an immunoelectron microscopic study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2005; 64 (05) 386-390
  • 51 Vallat JM, Tabaraud F, Sindou P, Preux PM, Vandenberghe A, Steck A. Myelin widenings and MGUS-IgA: an immunoelectron microscopic study. Ann Neurol 2000; 47 (06) 808-811
  • 52 Nobile-Orazio E, Manfredini E, Carpo M. et al. Frequency and clinical correlates of anti-neural IgM antibodies in neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy. Ann Neurol 1994; 36 (03) 416-424
  • 53 Latov N. Pathogenesis and therapy of neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies. Ann Neurol 1995; 37 (Suppl. 01) S32-S42
  • 54 Vallat JM, Magy L, Ciron J, Corcia P, Le Masson G, Mathis S. Therapeutic options and management of polyneuropathy associated with anti-MAG antibodies. Expert Rev Neurother 2016; 16 (09) 1111-1119
  • 55 Svahn J, Petiot P, Antoine JC. et al; Francophone Anti-MAG Cohort Group. Anti-MAG antibodies in 202 patients: clinicopathological and therapeutic features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018; 89 (05) 499-505
  • 56 Nobile-Orazio E, Meucci N, Baldini L, Di Troia A, Scarlato G. Long-term prognosis of neuropathy associated with anti-MAG IgM M-proteins and its relationship to immune therapies. Brain 2000; 123 (Pt 4): 710-717
  • 57 Stino AM, Elsheikh B, Allen JA. Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy: Where do we stand?. Muscle Nerve 2023; 68 (06) 823-832
  • 58 Dalakas MC, Rakocevic G, Salajegheh M. et al. Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibody demyelinating neuropathy. Ann Neurol 2009; 65 (03) 286-293
  • 59 Léger JM, Viala K, Nicolas G. et al; RIMAG Study Group (France and Switzerland). Placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Neurology 2013; 80 (24) 2217-2225
  • 60 Gorson KC, Ropper AH, Weinberg DH, Weinstein R. Treatment experience in patients with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24 (06) 778-786
  • 61 Comi G, Roveri L, Swan A. et al; Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Group. A randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in IgM paraprotein associated demyelinating neuropathy. J Neurol 2002; 249 (10) 1370-1377
  • 62 Dalakas MC, Quarles RH, Farrer RG. et al. A controlled study of intravenous immunoglobulin in demyelinating neuropathy with IgM gammopathy. Ann Neurol 1996; 40 (05) 792-795
  • 63 Théaudin M, Lozeron P, Lacroix C. et al. Short and long-term effect of IVIg in demyelinating neuropathy associated with MGUS, experience of a monocentric study. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2011; 167 (12) 897-904
  • 64 Menon D, Katzberg HD, Bril V. Treatment approaches for atypical CIDP. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 653734
  • 65 Kaku M, Berk JL. Neuropathy associated with systemic amyloidosis. Semin Neurol 2019; 39 (05) 578-588
  • 66 Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A. Amyloidosis: recognition, confirmation, prognosis, and therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74 (05) 490-494
  • 67 Matsuda M, Gono T, Morita H, Katoh N, Kodaira M, Ikeda S. Peripheral nerve involvement in primary systemic AL amyloidosis: a clinical and electrophysiological study. Eur J Neurol 2011; 18 (04) 604-610
  • 68 Duston MA, Skinner M, Anderson J, Cohen AS. Peripheral neuropathy as an early marker of AL amyloidosis. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149 (02) 358-360
  • 69 Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases. Semin Hematol 1995; 32 (01) 45-59
  • 70 Kelly Jr JJ, Kyle RA, O'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. The natural history of peripheral neuropathy in primary systemic amyloidosis. Ann Neurol 1979; 6 (01) 1-7
  • 71 Muchtar E, Gertz MA, Kyle RA. et al. A modern primer on light chain amyloidosis in 592 patients with mass spectrometry-verified typing. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94 (03) 472-483
  • 72 Cueto-Garcia L, Tajik AJ, Kyle RA. et al. Serial echocardiographic observations in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis: an introduction to the concept of early (asymptomatic) amyloid infiltration of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59 (09) 589-597
  • 73 Lu R, Richards TA. AL amyloidosis: unfolding a complex disease. J Adv Pract Oncol 2019; 10 (08) 813-825
  • 74 Sanchorawala V, Boccadoro M, Gertz M. et al. Guidelines for high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group guidelines. Amyloid 2022; 29 (01) 1-7
  • 75 Wechalekar AD, Cibeira MT, Gibbs SD. et al. Guidelines for non-transplant chemotherapy for treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis: EHA-ISA working group. Amyloid 2023; 30 (01) 3-17
  • 76 Riefolo M, Conti M, Longhi S, Fabbrizio B, Leone O. Amyloidosis: What does pathology offer? The evolving field of tissue biopsy. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9: 1081098
  • 77 Zhang CL, Feng J, Cao XX. et al. Selection of biopsy site for patients with systematic amyloidosis. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2016; 38 (06) 706-709
  • 78 Pinton S, Vacchi E, Chiaro G. et al. Amyloid detection and typing yield of skin biopsy in systemic amyloidosis and polyneuropathy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10 (12) 2347-2359
  • 79 Fine NM, Arruda-Olson AM, Dispenzieri A. et al. Yield of noncardiac biopsy for the diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113 (10) 1723-1727
  • 80 Garcia Y, Collins AB, Stone JR. Abdominal fat pad excisional biopsy for the diagnosis and typing of systemic amyloidosis. Hum Pathol 2018; 72: 71-79
  • 81 Kyle RA, Spencer RJ, Dahlin DC. Value of rectal biopsy in the diagnosis of primary systemic amyloidosis. Am J Med Sci 1966; 251 (05) 501-506
  • 82 Do Amaral B, Coelho T, Sousa A, Guimarães A. Usefulness of labial salivary gland biopsy in familial amyloid polyneuropathy Portuguese type. Amyloid 2009; 16 (04) 232-238
  • 83 Hachulla E, Janin A, Flipo RM. et al. Labial salivary gland biopsy is a reliable test for the diagnosis of primary and secondary amyloidosis. A prospective clinical and immunohistologic study in 59 patients. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36 (05) 691-697
  • 84 Suzuki T, Kusumoto S, Yamashita T. et al. Labial salivary gland biopsy for diagnosing immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: a retrospective analysis. Ann Hematol 2016; 95 (02) 279-285
  • 85 Gertz MA. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis diagnosis and treatment algorithm 2018. Blood Cancer J 2018; 8 (05) 44
  • 86 Vaxman I, Gertz M. Recent advances in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Acta Haematol 2019; 141 (02) 93-106
  • 87 Chakraborty R, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A. et al. Natural history of amyloidosis isolated to fat and bone marrow aspirate. Br J Haematol 2017; 179 (01) 170-172
  • 88 Kelly Jr JJ, Kyle RA, Miles JM, O'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. The spectrum of peripheral neuropathy in myeloma. Neurology 1981; 31 (01) 24-31
  • 89 Walsh JC. The neuropathy of multiple myeloma. An electrophysiological and histological study. Arch Neurol 1971; 25 (05) 404-414
  • 90 Malhotra P, Choudhary PP, Lal V, Varma N, Suri V, Varma S. Prevalence of peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma at initial diagnosis. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 52 (11) 2135-2138
  • 91 Richardson PG, Delforge M, Beksac M. et al. Management of treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2012; 26 (04) 595-608
  • 92 Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R. et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2001; 15 (08) 1274-1276
  • 93 Rajkumar SV, Hayman S, Gertz MA. et al. Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20 (21) 4319-4323
  • 94 Siegel D, Martin T, Nooka A. et al. Integrated safety profile of single-agent carfilzomib: experience from 526 patients enrolled in 4 phase II clinical studies. Haematologica 2013; 98 (11) 1753-1761
  • 95 Dalla Torre C, Zambello R, Cacciavillani M. et al. Lenalidomide long-term neurotoxicity: clinical and neurophysiologic prospective study. Neurology 2016; 87 (11) 1161-1166
  • 96 Dimopoulos MA, Leleu X, Palumbo A. et al. Expert panel consensus statement on the optimal use of pomalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014; 28 (08) 1573-1585
  • 97 Richardson PG, Briemberg H, Jagannath S. et al. Frequency, characteristics, and reversibility of peripheral neuropathy during treatment of advanced multiple myeloma with bortezomib. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24 (19) 3113-3120
  • 98 Mauermann ML. Paraproteinemic neuropathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2014; 20 (5 Peripheral Nervous System Disorders): 1307-1322
  • 99 Khouri J, Nakashima M, Wong S. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes) syndrome: a review. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7 (09) 1383-1391
  • 100 Suichi T, Misawa S, Beppu M. et al. Prevalence, clinical profiles, and prognosis of POEMS syndrome in Japanese nationwide survey. Neurology 2019; 93 (10) e975-e983
  • 101 Dispenzieri A. POEMS syndrome: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2019; 94 (07) 812-827
  • 102 Cerri F, Falzone YM, Riva N, Quattrini A. An update on the diagnosis and management of the polyneuropathy of POEMS syndrome. J Neurol 2019; 266 (01) 258-267
  • 103 Li J, Zhang W, Jiao L. et al. Combination of melphalan and dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome. Blood 2011; 117 (24) 6445-6449
  • 104 Briani C, Visentin A, Campagnolo M. et al. Peripheral nervous system involvement in lymphomas. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2019; 24 (01) 5-18
  • 105 Grisariu S, Avni B, Batchelor TT. et al; International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group. Neurolymphomatosis: an International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report. Blood 2010; 115 (24) 5005-5011
  • 106 Bumma N, Kahwash R, Parikh SV. et al. Multidisciplinary amyloidosis care in the era of personalized medicine. Front Neurol 2022; 13: 935936
  • 107 Wall SA, Stevens E, Vaughn J, Bumma N, Rosko AE, Borate U. Multidisciplinary approach to older adults with hematologic malignancies - a paradigm shift. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2022; 17 (01) 31-38
  • 108 Mateos MV, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA. et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J 2020; 10 (10) 102