Sleep Breath 2000; 04(2): 089-094
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-19817
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Legal Perspective: Licensing and Liability Issues Regarding the Use of Oral Appliances in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Neal A. Cooper
  • Neal Cooper is an attorney and CPA who practices law with Jenner & Block in Chicago, Illinois. He specializes in health care and business law
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
31. Dezember 2000 (online)

Zoom Image

As the science of disordered sleep develops, the public is becoming increasingly aware of how large a segment of the population suffers from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). As discussed extensively in this issue of Sleep and Breathing, one of the many treatments for OSA makes use of an oral appliance (OA) that positions the patient's jaw in a manner that maintains the integrity of the patient's posterior airway space during sleep.[1] Because of the nature of OA therapy, certain aspects of this treatment may fall within the scope of practice of physicians, and certain aspects may fall within the scope of practice of dentists. From a legal standpoint, two main concerns arise in this context: compliance with local licensing requirements, and issues of professional liability.

Each jurisdiction has laws that define the scope of practice of licensed health professionals within that jurisdiction. With respect to OA therapy, a number of licensing concerns apply. For example, the diagnosis of OSA, and the prescription, construction, fitting, placement, and adjustment of an OA may, based on the jurisdiction in which the conduct occurs, be restricted to either physicians or dentists. Practitioners should be aware of the limitations of their own jurisdiction before undertaking a treatment of OSA involving the use of an OA.

Liability issues applicable to this course of treatment come in several stripes. For example, each jurisdiction may provide for civil and criminal penalties for violations of the licensing statutes. In addition, a health-care practitioner may be exposed to malpractice liability where a course of treatment is undertaken in violation of the licensing statute,[2] or otherwise does not satisfy the applicable standard of care.[3] A number of factors comprise the standard of care for a given course of treatment, but as a general rule, the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent practitioner of the profession is used as a baseline measure.[4]