ABSTRACT
Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been conducted for over
half a century now and have incorporated a wide variety of drugs. Most of these trials
have had negative results and a cure remains elusive. The explosion in our understanding
of molecular biology and parallel developments in clinical epidemiology have opened
up a vast number of novel therapeutic strategies. However, advances in statistical
analysis, computing, and global communications have also put greater pressure on scientific
investigators to improve the design and implementation of clinical trials so that
they permit rigorous testing of hypotheses within a solid ethical framework. This
article documents the first published trial for all drugs tried clinically in the
treatment of ALS, focusing in more detail on the large, multicenter trials of recent
years, namely those involving riluzole, ciliary neurotrophic factor, insulin-like
growth factor-I, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and SR57746A. The problems in
the design of trials in ALS are discussed, including the selection of end points and
surrogate markers of disease progression, and the major parameters in ALS assessment
are reviewed.
KEYWORD
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - motor neuron disease - clinical trial - end point
- surrogate marker - riluzole - ciliary neurotrophic factor - insulin-like growth
factor-I - brain-derived neurotrophic factor - SR57746A