Download PDF
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2002; 4(1): 9-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-20430
Original Paper
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

A Comparison of Two Techniques for Wood Fibre Isolation - Evaluation by Tensile Tests on Single Fibres with Different Microfibril Angle

I. Burgert 1,2 , J. Keckes 2 , K. Frühmann 1 , P. Fratzl 2 , S. E. Tschegg 1
  • 1 Institute of Meteorology and Physics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna, Austria
  • 2 Erich Schmid Institute for Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences and Institute of Metal Physics, University of Leoben, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

June 25, 2001

October 28, 2001

Publication Date:
28 February 2002 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Fibres (tracheids) of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) were isolated by means of two isolation techniques. On the one hand, a soft chemical treatment with Jeffrey solution was used. The isolation was carried out with a reduced time of treatment (2 h), just to achieve the state where the fibres could be separated easily with tweezers. On the other hand, fibres were directly peeled out with tweezers, taking advantage of the low shear strength between them. Following this approach, a chemical treatment could be avoided completely. In order to compare the isolation techniques, single tracheids from tissue types with different microfibril angle (earlywood, latewood, juvenile wood, opposite wood, compression wood) were tested in the dry state. The microfibril angles were determined by X-ray diffraction. Single tracheids handled with both isolation techniques were strained in microtensile tests and load-strain diagrams were obtained. The chemically treated fibres were found to have much lower strength and stiffness compared to the mechanically isolated fibres, even though the influence of microfibril angle was still obvious for both kinds of treatment. The results clearly show the importance of single fibre extraction to preserve as much as possible the original properties.

Key words

Chemical maceration - mechanical isolation - single fibres - tensile tests - microfibril angle - spruce

References

  • 01 Niklas,  K. J.. (1992) Plant biomechanics. Chicago; Chicago Univ. Press 607 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 02 Jayne,  B. A.. (1960);  Some mechanical properties of wood fibres in tension.  Forest Products Journal. 10 316-322
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 03 Schniewind,  A. P.. (1966);  Über Unterschiede in der Zugfestigkeit von Früh- und Spätholztracheiden.  Holz Roh- Werkst.. 24 502-506
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 04 Page,  D. H.,, El-Hosseiny,  F.,, and Winkler,  K.. (1971);  Behaviour of single wood fibres under axial tensile strain.  Nature. 229 252-253
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 05 Mott,  L.,, Shaler,  S. M.,, Groom,  L. H.,, and Liang,  B.-H.. (1995);  The tensile testing of individual fibres using environmental scanning electron microscopy and video image analysis.  Tappi. 78 143-148
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 06 Reiterer,  A.,, Jakob,  H. F.,, Stanzl-Tschegg,  S. E.,, and Fratzl,  P.. (1998);  Spiral angle of elementary cellulose fibrils in cell walls of Picea abies determined by small-angle X-ray scattering.  Wood Sci. Technol.. 32 335-345
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 07 Lichtenegger,  H.,, Reiterer,  A.,, Tschegg,  S. E.,, and Fratzl,  P.. (1998) Determination of spiral angles of elementary fibrils in the wood cell wall: comparison of small-angle x-ray scattering and wide-angle X-ray diffraction. Microfibril angle in wood. Butterfield, B., ed. New Zealand; Christchurch, University of Canterbury pp. 140-156
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 08 Gerlach,  D.. (1969) Botanische Mikrotechnik. Stuttgart; Thieme Verlag
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 09 Kersavage,  P. C.. (1962) The effect of some chemical methods of fiber preparation on the tensile strength of Douglas fir fibers. Berkeley, California; M.S. Thesis, University of California
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Groom,  L. H.,, Shaler,  S. M.,, and Mott,  L.. (1995) The mechanical properties of individual lignocellulosic fibers. Proceedings of the Forest Products Society, No. 7293. Madison, Wisconsin; Woodfiber-plastic composites pp. 33-40
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Shaler,  S. M.,, Groom,  L. H.,, and Mott,  L.. (1995) Microscopic analysis of wood fibers using ESEM and confocal microscopy. Proceedings of the Forest Products Society, No. 7293. Madison, Wisconsin; Woodfiber-plastic composites pp. 25-32
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Perez,  L.,, Pittet,  V.,, and Navi,  P.. (2000) Fibre behaviour under tensile force, experimentation and modelling. Proceedings of the Int. Conf. Wood and Wood Fiber Composites. Aicher, S., ed. Stuttgart; Otto-Graf-Institut, Universität Stuttgart pp. 47-58
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Page,  D. H., and El-Hosseiny,  F.. (1983);  The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibres. Part VI. Fibril angle and the shape of the stress-strain curve.  Journal of Pulp and Paper Science. 9 1-2
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

I. Burgert

Institute of Meteorology and Physics
University of Agricultural Sciences

Vienna
Austria

Email: ingo.burgert@mail.boku.ac.at

Section Editor: A. M. C. Emons