Sleep Breath 2002; 06(2): 055-068
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32319
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

The Effect of Posture and a Mandibular Protruding Device on Pharyngeal Dimensions: A Cephalometric Study

Anette M.C. Fransson1 , Björn A.H. Svenson2 , Göran Isacsson3
  • 1Department of Stomatognathic Physiology, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden
  • 2Department of Radiology, Central Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
  • 3AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 June 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objectives were to evaluate the impact of body posture on cephalometric measures and the level and the extent to which treatment with a mandibular protruding device (MPD) affects pharyngeal width. The study was composed of 77 patients: 50 were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and 27 snored. After each patient underwent a baseline medical (including a somnographic registration), dental and stomatognathic examination, an MPD that would protrude the mandible 75% of the maximal protrusion range was fabricated. In a radiographic examination, four cephalograms were taken: two in the upright position with and without the MPD and two in the supine position with and without the MPD. The cephalometric measures focused on the pharyngeal structures. MPD treatment significantly increased the relative pharyngeal area (at the level of the oropharynx and the hypopharynx) by a mean of +89.6 mm

@affil2:2 (P < 0.01) in the upright posture. The relative pharyngeal area, however, was reduced by more than 50% in the supine position compared with the upright position, independent of MPD treatment. In the supine position, compared with upright, most pharyngeal measures decreased significantly; the hyoid was significantly lower and displaced posteriorly, and the area of the velum increased by a mean of +201.2 mm

@affil2:2 (P < 0.001). We conclude that the MPD significantly increased most pharyngeal measures except the linear distance between the hyoid bone and the third vertebra and decreased the area of the velum.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Miyamoto K, Ozbek M M, Lowe A A, Fleetham J A. Effect of body position on tongue posture in awake patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.  Thorax . 1997;  52 255-259
  • 2 Solow B, Skov S, Ovesen J, Norup P W, Wildschiödtz G. Airway dimensions and head posture in obstructive sleep apnoea.  Eur J Orthod . 1996;  18 571-579
  • 3 Lowe A A, Ono T, Ferguson K A, Pae E-K, Ryan F R, Fleetham J A. Cephalometric comparisons of craniofacial and upper airway structure by skeletal subtype and gender in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1996;  110 653-664
  • 4 Battagel J, Johal A, Kotecha B. A cephalometric comparison of subjects with snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.  Eur J Orthod . 2000;  22 353-365
  • 5 Bonham P E, Currier G F, Orr W C, Othman J, Nanda R S. The effect of a modified functional appliance on obstructive sleep apnea.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1988;  94 384-392
  • 6 Yildirim N, Fitzpatrick M F, Whyte K F, Jalleh R, Wightman A JA, Douglas N J. The effect of posture on upper airway dimensions in normal subjects and in patients with the sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome.  Am Rev Respir Dis . 1991;  144 845-847
  • 7 Battagel J M, Johal A, L'Estrange P R, Croft C B, Kotecha B. Changes in airway and hyoid position in response to mandibular protrusion in subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).  Eur J Orthod . 1999;  21 363-376
  • 8 Lowe A A, Özbek M M, Miyamoto K, Pae E-K, Fleetham J A. Cephalometric and demographic characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea: an evaluation with partial least squares analysis.  Angle Orthod . 1997;  67 143-154
  • 9 Pae E-K, Lowe A A, Sasaki K, Price C, Tsuchiya M, Fleetham J A. A cephalometric and electromyographic study of upper airway structures in the upright and supine positions.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1994;  106 52-59
  • 10 Masumi S-I, Nishigawa K, Williams A J, Yan-Go F L, Clark G T. Effect of jaw position and posture on forced inspiratory airflow in normal subjects and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.  Chest . 1996;  109 1484-1489
  • 11 Fouke J M, Strohl K P. Effect of position and lung volume on upper airway geometry.  J Appl Physiol . 1987;  63 375-380
  • 12 Miyamoto K, Özbek M M, Lowe A A. Mandibular posture during sleep in healthy adults.  Arch Oral Biol . 1998;  43 269-275
  • 13 Pae E-K, Lowe A A, Fleetham J A. A role of pharyngeal length in obstructive sleep apnea patients.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1997;  111 12-17
  • 14 Bernhold M, Bondemark L. A magnetic appliance for treatment of snoring patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1998;  113 144-155
  • 15 Pracharktam N, Hans M G, Strohl K P, Redline S. Upright and supine cephalometric evaluation of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and snoring subjects.  Angle Orthod . 1994;  64 63-74
  • 16 Tangugsorn V, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): a cephalometric analysis of severe and non-severe OSA patients. Part I: multiple comparison of cephalometric variables.  Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg . 2000;  15 139-152
  • 17 Fransson A MC, Isacsson G, Leissner L C, Näsman A B, Alton M K. Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a mandibular protruding device: an open-label study.  Sleep Breath . 2001;  5 23-34
  • 18 George P T. Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a dental device.  Dent Update . 1996;  23 12-19
  • 19 Iikubo M, Korsell S, Omnell K-Å. Description of a new cephalostat and its performance.  Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 1975;  4 25-29
  • 20 Athanasiou A E, Papadopoulos M A, Mazaheri M, Lagoudakis M. Cephalometric evaluation of pharynx, soft palate, adenoid tissue, tongue, and hyoid bone following the use of a mandibular repositioning appliance in obstructive sleep apnea patients.  Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg . 1994;  9 273-283
  • 21 Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students.  London: George Allen & Unwin LTD 1948
  • 22 Montgomery D. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th ed.  New York: Wiley 1996
  • 23 Lowe A A. Can we predict the success of dental appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea based on anatomic considerations?.  Sleep . 1993;  16 S93-95
  • 24 Liu Y, Park Y-C, Lowe A A, Fleetham J A. Supine cephalometric analyses of an adjustable oral appliance used in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.  Sleep Breath . 2000;  4 59-66
  • 25 Gale D J, Sawyer R H, Woodcock A, Stone P, Thompson R, O'Brien K. Do oral appliances enlarge the airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea?.  <~>A prospective computerized tomographic study. Eur J Orthod . 2000;  22 159-168
  • 26 Schwartz A R, Eisele D W, Smith P L. Pharyngeal airway obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea: pathophysiology and clinical implications.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am . 1998;  31 911-918
  • 27 Ono T, Lowe A A, Ferguson K A, Pae E-K, Fleetham J A. The effect of the tongue retaining device on awake genioglossus muscle activity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 1996;  110 28-35
  • 28 L'Estrange P R, Battagel J M, Harkness B, Spratley M H, Nolan P J, Jorgensen G I. A method of studying adaptive changes of the oropharynx to variation in mandibular position in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.  J Oral Rehabil . 1996;  23 699-711