Cervical Myelopathy Associated with Degenerative Spine Disease and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Meic H. Schmidt; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; William S. Rosenberg

doi:10.1055/s-2002-36537

Seminars in Neurology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Semin Neurol 2002; 22(2): 143-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36537

Cervical Myelopathy Associated with Degenerative Spine Disease and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Meic H. Schmidt¹ , Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa² , William S. Rosenberg³

¹Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
²Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
³Midwest Neurosurgery Associates, Kansas City, Missouri

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament are two of the leading etiologies of spinal cord damage in older patients. For most patients, the natural history is one of slow stepwise decline in function. With nonsurgical therapy only 30 to 50% of patients are expected to stabilize. Surgical options include anterior and posterior surgical decompression, spinal canal expansion, and spinal column stabilization. Prospective, randomized trials with standardized outcome measures are needed to clarify the benefit of surgery conclusively.

KEYWORDS

Cervical myelopathy - ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament - cervical spondylotic myelopathy - surgery

Volltext

Referenzen

REFERENCES

1 Gore D R, Sepic S B, Gardner G M. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine . 1986; 11 521-524
2 Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K, Imamura H, Abe H. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg . 1998; 88 247-254
3 Kurata A, Tokiwa K, Kitahara I. [Myelopathy caused by hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament (HPLL): case report]. No Shinkei Geka Neurol Surg. 1987; 15 651-655
4 Harsh G RT, Sypert G W, Weinstein P R, Ross D A, Wilson C B. Cervical spine stenosis secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg. 1987; 67 349-357
5 Burrows H. The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin Radiol . 1963; 14 77-88
6 Adams C B, Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: II. The movement and contour of the spine in relation to the neural complications of cervical spondylosis. Brain . 1971; 94 568-586
7 Cusick J F. Pathophysiology and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Neurosurg . 1991; 37 661-681
8 Edwards W C, LaRocca H. The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine . 1983; 8 20-27
9 Yue W M, Tan S B, Tan M H, Koh D C, Tan C T. The Torg-Pavlov ratio in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a nonspondylotic, nonmyelopathic population. Spine . 2001; 26 1760-1764
10 Hukuda S, Wilson C B. Experimental cervical myelopathy: effects of compression and ischemia on the canine cervical cord. J Neurosurg . 1972; 37 631-652
11 Taylor A. Vascular factors in the myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis. Neurology . 1964; 14 62-68
12 Clifton A G, Stevens J M, Whitear P, Kendall B E. Identifiable causes for poor outcome in surgery for cervical spondylosis: post-operative computed myelography and MR imaging. Neuroradiology . 1990; 32 450-455
13 Phillips D G. Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1973; 36 879-884
14 Reale F. Long-term results in 102 cases of cervical myeloradiculopathy operated on for spondylosis and disc herniation. Ital J Neurol Sci . 1983; 4 291-296
15 Signorini G C, Beltramello A, Pinna G, Dalle Ore G. The significance of preoperative neurological disorders in predicting outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgery. J Neurosurg Sci . 1984; 28 89-92
16 Teresi L M, Lufkin R B, Reicher M A. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging. Radiology . 1987; 164 83-88
17 Clarke E, Robinson P. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain . 1956; 79 483-510
18 Lees F, Turner J. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. Br Med J . 1963; 2 1607-1610
19 Nurick S. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain . 1972; 95 101-108
20 Symon L, Lavender P. The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurology . 1967; 17 117-127
21 LaRocca H. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: natural history. Spine . 1988; 13 854-855
22 Carol M P, Ducker T B. Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord . 1988; 1 59-65
23 Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T. Long-term results of the anterior cervical spondylodesis. Neurosurgery . 1994; 35 64-68
24 Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy: a comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine . 1992; 17 1281-1284
25 Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis J D, Ducker T B. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy: a prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review. Spine . 2000; 25 670-676
26 Cusick J F, Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Myklebust J, Hussain H. Biomechanics of cervical spine facetectomy and fixation techniques. Spine . 1988; 13 808-812
27 Cusick J F, Pintar F A, Yoganandan N. Biomechanical alterations induced by multilevel cervical laminectomy. Spine . 1995; 20 2392-2398
28 Benzel E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior surgical approaches. In: Menezes A, Sonntag V, Benzel E, Cahill D, McCormick P, Papadopoulos S, eds. Principles of Spinal Surgery Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill 1996: 571-580
29 Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine . 1988; 13 870-876
30 Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine . 1985; 10 729-736
31 Tanaka J, Seki N, Tokimura F, Doi K, Inoue S. Operative results of canal-expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients. Spine . 1999; 24 2308-2312
32 Shimamura T, Kato S, Toba T, Yamazaki K, Ehara S. Sagittal splitting laminoplasty for spinal canal enlargement for ossification of the spinal ligaments (OPLL and OLF). Semin Musculoskeletal Radiol . 2001; 5 203-206
33 Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine . 2001; 26 1443-1447
34 Lowery G L, McDonough R F. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation: patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine . 1998; 23 181-186
35 Onari K, Akiyama N, Kondo S. Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine . 2001; 26 488-493
36 Abe H, Tsuru M, Ito T, Iwasaki Y, Koiwa M. Anterior decompression for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg . 1981; 55 108-116
37 Kojima T, Waga S, Kubo Y. Anterior cervical vertebrectomy and interbody fusion for multi-level spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurgery . 1989; 24 864-872
38 Zdeblick T A, Bohlman H H. Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy: treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1989; 71 170-182
39 Fernyhough J C, White J I, LaRocca H. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine . 1991; 16(suppl 10) S561-S564
40 Mizuno J, Nakagawa H. Outcome analysis of anterior decompressive surgery and fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: report of 107 cases and review of literature. Neurosurg Focus . 2001; 10 1-7
41 Epstein J E, Epstein N E. The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach. In: Sherk H, Dunn E, Eismont F, eds. The Cervical Spine 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1989: 625-643
42 Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine . 2001; 26 1890-1894