Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2003; 11: 66-69
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42301
Humerus

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Revisions after Treatment of Diaphyseal Humeral Fractures

A. M. Sárváry1 , J. Feczkó2 , J. Wille1 , G. Baranyi2
  • 1Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • 2Department of Traumatology, Budapest Péterfy Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2003 (online)

Abstract

The authors demonstrate the protocol of revisions after primary therapy of 22 diaphyseal humeral fractures due to bone healing disturbances. The complications are easy to recognize through clinical and radiological signs. Through early revision the prevention of contractures and posttraumatic osteoporosis, causing insufficient late functional results, is possible. The authors also demonstrate the indications of possible closed (cannulated humeral nail) and open (plates) methods, the biomechanical, biological and technical advantages and disadvantages. Combined methods with high risk can also be successful with proper surgical techniques. Between 1996 and 2000 following the revisions of 21 patients the bony consolidation was perfect, one postoperative septic complication was controlled after metal removal. One patient died because of background disease. Neither loosening, deformity nor breakage of intra- or extramedullary implants, nor iatrogenic radial nerve palsy occurred.

References

  • 1 denBoer F C, Patka P, Bakker F C. et al . Current concepts of fracture healing, delayed unions and nonunions.  Osteo Trauma Care. 2002;  10 1-7
  • 2 Marti R K, Verheyen C CPM, Besselaar P P. Humeral shaft nonunion: evaluation of uniform surgical repair in fifty-one patients.  J Orthop Trauma. 2002;  16 108-115
  • 3 Nast-Kolb D, Knoefel W T, Schweiberer L. Die Behandlung der Oberarmschaftfraktur. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven AO-Sammelstudie.  Unfallchirurg. 1991;  94 447-453
  • 4 Robinson C M, Bell K M, Court-Brown C M. et al . Locked nailing of humeral shaft fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;  74 558-562
  • 5 Rommens P M, Vansteenkiste F, Stappaerts K H. et al . Indikationen, Gefahren und Ergebnisse der operativen Behandlung von Oberarmschaftfrakturen.  Unfallchirurg. 1989;  92 565-570
  • 6 Rommens P M, Blum J, Runkel M. Retrograde nailing of humeral shaft fractures.  Clin Orthop. 1998;  13 51-60
  • 7 Rüedi T P, Murphy W M. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme, Stuttgart 2000; 291
  • 8 Sárváry A, Baranyi G y, Tóth A, Wille J. Die Konservative Behandlung der Oberarmfraktur.  Akt Traumatol. 2000;  30 191-194
  • 9 Szendröi M, Sárváry A. Surgery of bone metastases. In: Besznyák I (ed). Diagnosis and surgery of organ metastases. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2001; 213
  • 10 Wallny T, Westermann K, Sagebiel C. et al . Functional treatment of humeral shaft fractures: indications and results.  J Orthop Trauma. 1997;  11 283-287
  • 11 Zagorski J B, Latta L L, Zych G A. et al . Diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. Treatment with prefabricated braces.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1988;  70 607-610

A. M. Sárváry

Semmelweis University · Faculty of Medicine · Department of Traumatology, Budapest

Péterfy Hospital

Péterfy S. Street 14

1076 Budapest

Hungary

Phone: +3 61/4 61-47 23

Fax: +3 61/4 61-47 24

Email: sarvary@mail.datanet.hu