Download PDF
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2003; 5(5): 531-539
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44783
Original Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Functional Gynodioecy in Opuntia quimilo (Cactaceae), a Tree Cactus Pollinated by Bees and Hummingbirds

L. Díaz 1 , A. A. Cocucci 1
  • 1Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Córdoba, Argentina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2003 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The tree cactus Opuntia quimilo is one of three known gynodioecious cacti. Its flowers deviate from most Opuntias in features that are attributable to ornithophily: petals are shiny red in colour, and fleshy in consistency, a nectar chamber is present, and stamen seismonasty is lacking. Pollinators include large matinal bees (predominantly Ptilothrix tricolor and Megachile sp.) and hummingbirds (Chlorostilbon aureoventris and Heliomaster furcifer). Hummingbirds rarely visit other local Opuntias. Hummingbirds, which are more common in the afternoon, prefer female flowers whereas bees prefer hermaphroditic flowers. Female flowers have more dilute nectar than hermaphroditic flowers. Under experimental conditions female fertility is as high as that of hermaphrodites, however, seeds from females always result from cross-pollination and from more severe ovule selection (ovule number is higher in female flowers). Under natural conditions female plants are reproductively more successful than hermaphrodites. Known cases of bird pollination in Opuntia and the incidence of ornithophilic features in Opuntia and related genera are discussed.

Key words

Argentina - Megachile - Ptilothrix - Chlorostilbon - Heliomaster - breeding system - self-compatibility.

References

  • 1 Aizen M. A.. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina.  Ecology. (1994);  73 330-351
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arroyo M. T. K., Raven P. H.. The evolution of subdioecy in morphologically gynodioecious species of Fuchsia sect. Encliandra (Onagraceae).  Evolution. (1975);  29 500-511
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Backeberg H. V.. Die Cactaceae, Vol. 1: I - XVI; 1 - 638, 35 pl. Jena; VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag (1958)
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bateman A. J.. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila.  Heredity. (1949);  2 349-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Baker H. G.. Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers.  Biotropica. (1975);  7 37-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bawa K. S.. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants.  Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.. (1980);  11 15-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cabido M. R., Zak M.. Vegetación del Norte de Córdoba. Córdoba; Imprenta Nico (1999): 16-18
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D.. Population genetics of partial male-sterility and the evolution of monoecy and dioecy.  Heredity. (1979);  41 137-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cockerell F. D. A.. The cactus bees: genus Lithurgus. .  Amer. Naturalist. (1900);  34 487-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Darwin C.. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. London; John Murray (1877): 1-352
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Delpino F.. Ulteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla Dicogamia nel Regno Vegetale.  Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat.. (1868);  17 200-351
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fleming T. H., Maurice S., Buchmann S. L., Tuttle M. D.. Reproductive biology and relative male and female fitness in a trioecious cactus, Pachycereus pringlei (Cactaceae).  Amer. J. Bot.. (1994);  81 858-867
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Freeman D. C., McArthur E. D., Harper K. T.. The adaptative significance of sexual lability in plants using Atriplex canescens as a principal example.  Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.. (1984);  71 265-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ganders F. R., Kennedy H.. Gynodioecy in Mammillaria dioica (Cactaceae).  Madroño. (1978);  25 234-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grant B. R., Grant P. R.. Exploitation of Opuntia cactus by birds on the Galapagos.  Oecologia (Berl.). (1981);  49 179-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grant V., Grant K. A.. The pollination spectrum in the southwestern American cactus flora.  Pl. Syst. Evol.. (1979);  133 29-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Grant V., Grant K. A., Hurd P. D.. Pollination of Opuntia lindheimeri and related species.  Pl. Syst. Evol.. (1979);  132 313-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Griffith P.. Phylogenetic relationships in the Opuntioideae (Cactaceae) based on nrITS sequences. Phoenix, Arizona: 27th IOS Congress, Desert Botanic Garden. (2002)
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Knuth P., Appel O., Loew E.. Handbuch der Blütenbiologie 3. (1904): 1-569
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Lagerheim G. V.. Über die Bestäubungs- und Aussähungseinrichtungen von Brachyotum ledifolium. .  Bot. Notis.. (1895);  1899 105-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lewis D.. The evolution of sex in flowering plants.  Biol. Rev. (London). (1942);  17 46-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lloyd D. G.. Sex ratios in sexually dimorphic Umbelliferae.  Heredity. (1973);  31 239-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lloyd D. G.. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms.  Heredity. (1974);  32 11-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 McFarland J. D., Kevan P. G., Lanc N. A.. Pollination biology of Opuntia imbricata (Cactaceae) in southern Colorado.  Canadian J. Bot.. (1989);  67 (1) 24-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Michener C. H.. The Bees of the World. Baltimore, London; Johns Hopkins University Press (2000): 684-685
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Osborn M. M., Kevan P. G., Lane M. A.. Pollination biology of Opuntia polyacantha and Opuntia phaecantha (Cactaceae) in Southern Colorado.  Pl. Syst. Evol.. (1988);  159 85-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Parfitt B. D.. Dioecy in North American Cactaceae: a review.  Sida. (1985);  11 200-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Porsch O.. Vogelblumenstudien. II. Jahrb.  Wiss. Bot.. (1929);  70 181-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Porsch O.. Das Bestäubungsleben der Kakteenblüte 1.  Jahrb. Deutsch. Kakteen-Ges., Teil 1. Cactaceae (DKG). (1938): 1-80
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Proctor M., Yeo P., Lack A. J.. The Natural History of Pollination. London; Harper Collins Publishers (1996): 340-346
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Richards A. J.. Plant breeding systems (2nd ed.) London; Chapman and Hall (1997): 318-332
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Sayago M.. Estudio fitogeográfico del Norte de Córdoba.  Bol. Acad. Nac. Ci. (Córdoba). (1969);  46 123-427
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Schlindwein C., Wittmann D.. Stamen movements in flowers of Opuntia (Cactaceae) favour oligolectic pollinators.  Pl. Syst. Evol.. (1997);  204 179-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Stiles F. G.. Geographical aspects of bird-flower coevolution, with particular reference to Central America.  Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.. (1981);  68 323-351
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Valiente-Banuet A., Rojas Martínez A., Aarssen L.. Pollination biology of two columnar cacti (Neobuxbaumia mezcalensis and Neobuxbaumia macrocephala) in the Tehuacan Valley, Central México.  Amer. J. Bot.. (1997);  84 452-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Webb C. J.. Breeding systems and the evolution of dioecy in New Zealand and apioid Umbelliferae.  Evolution. (1979);  33 662-725
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Willson M.. Sexual selection in plants.  Amer. Naturalist. (1979);  113 777-790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

A. A. Cocucci

Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal

Casilla de Correo 495

5000 Córdoba

Argentina

Email: asersic@com.uncor.edu

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger