References
Reviews:
1a
Porco JA.
Schreiber SL. In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis
Vol. 5:
Trost BM.
Fleming I.
Pergamon;
Oxford:
1991.
p.151-192
1b
Abe M.
Nojima M.
J. Synth. Org. Chem., Jpn.
2001,
59:
855
For example:
2a Thromboxane A2: Bhalgwat SS.
Still WC.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985,
107:
6372
2b Oxetin: Kawata Y.
Ikekawa N.
Murata M.
Omura S.
Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1986,
34:
3102
2c Oxetanocin: Nishiyama S.
Yamamura S.
J. Synth. Org. Chem., Jpn.
1991,
49:
670
2d Merrilactone A: Birman VB.
Danishefsky SJ.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002,
124:
2080
3a
Tomooka K.
Yamamoto H.
Nakai T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996,
118:
3317
3b
Tomooka K.
Yamamoto H.
Nakai T.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2000,
39:
4500
4 All new compounds were fully characterized by IR, 1H and 13C NMR analyses. Data for selected compounds are as follows. Compound α-1a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.55-7.52 (m, 2 H), 7.40-7.38 (m, 3 H), 5.98 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.85 (s, 1 H), 4.13 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.84 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.54 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 1.14 (s, 3 H), 1.07 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 137.0, 129.6, 128.4, 126.7, 106.2, 104.7, 88.0, 77.2, 43.0, 24.0, 17.9. Compound β-1a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.48-7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.40-7.37 (m, 3 H), 6.09 (s, 1 H), 6.03 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.23 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.78 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 3.69 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H), 1.20 (s, 3 H), 1.07 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 137.5, 129.5, 128.4, 126.4, 106.0, 105.7, 88.1, 80.1, 43.0, 25.0, 18.9. IR (neat): 2963, 2873, 1460, 1393, 1222, 1074, 1027, 1008 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C13H16O3: C, 70.89; H, 7.32. Found: C, 71.16; H, 7.26. [α]D
28 +29.4 (c 3.67, CHCl3). Compound 2a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.41-7.36 (m, 1 H), 7.26-7.25 (m, 3 H), 5.10 (br s, 1 H), 4.92 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.63 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.00 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1 H), 1.60 (br s, 1 H), 0.96 (s, 12 H), 0.84 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 139.2, 128.8, 127.6, 127.2, 126.5, 125.9, 95.9, 88.7, 70.0, 66.7, 39.4, 37.4, 24.7, 24.4, 19.8. IR (reflection): 3235, 2925, 1473, 1391, 1364, 1169, 963, 709, 598 cm-1. Compound 2e: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 4.26 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.16 (dd, J = 11.3, 7.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.55 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.40 (dd, J = 11.1, 5.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.60 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1 H), 2.09 (br s, 1 H), 1.63 (s, 3 H), 0.99 (s, 3 H), 0.97 (s, 9 H), 0.93 (s, 3 H), 0.19 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 103.0, 95.1, 94.1, 82.8, 72.1, 70.0, 37.3, 26.5, 26.2, 20.0, 19.4, 16.6, -4.39, -4.44. IR (neat): 3418, 2956, 2928, 2857, 1472, 1363, 1251, 1123, 835, 777 cm-1. Compound 6: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.43-7.29 (m, 5 H), 5.89 (br s, 1 H), 5.45 (dd, J = 2.7, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.56 (br s, 2 H), 4.04 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.43 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.74 (br s, 1 H), 1.10 (s, 3 H), 1.01 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 141.0, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 125.5, 125.3, 91.4, 90.8, 74.4, 66.6, 39.6, 23.5, 20.2. IR (neat): 3332, 2958, 2929, 1454, 1134, 1047, 972, 698 cm-1.
5 The diastereomer ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis.
6 The relative stereochemistry of α-1a and 2e was determined by NOE experiment as shown below (Figure
[2]
).
7a
Trost BM.
Edstrom ED.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1990,
29:
520
7b
Tomooka K.
Nakamura Y.
Nakai T.
Synlett
1995,
321
8 Crystallographic data of 4a and 2b have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center as supplementary publication no. CCDC 225890 and 225891, respectively. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK [fax: +44 (1223)336033; e-mail:
deposit @ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
9 The relative stereochemistry of 2c was determined by NOE experiment of its acetal derivative as shown below (Scheme
[9]
).
10 The substrate 2d consisted of a 1:1 mixture of two epimers at the chirality center of s-Bu.
11
General Procedure for the Ring-Contraction Reaction: To a THF (9 mL) solution of 1a (72.4 mg, 0.33 mmol, 62% dr) was added n-BuLi (1.04 mL, 1.27 M in hexane, 1.32 mmol) dropwise at -78 °C. After the addition, the solution was stirred for 15 min at -78 °C, and the temperature was allowed to rise to 0 °C over a period of 1 h. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h, and then sat. NH4Cl aq was added. The mixture was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic phase was dried over Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane/Et2O = 1:1) to give the oxetane 2c (67.8 mg, 74%, >95% dr). In the case of the reaction with MeLi, >10 equiv of MeLi was required to drive the reaction to completion.
12 Acetal 1b was prepared from (-)-pantolactone in three steps as shown below (Scheme
[10]
).
13 We cannot rule out the possibility that the reaction proceeds via not a free carbene but a related carbenoid intermediate.
The alkyl lithium-promoted carbene or a related carbenoid formation in acetal system, followed by its insertion to alkyl lithium has been reported, see:
14a
Shiner CS.
Tsunoda T.
Goodman BA.
Ingham S.
Lee S.
Vorndam PE.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989,
111:
1381
14b
Boche G.
Bosold F.
Lohrenz JCW.
Opel A.
Zulauf P.
Chem. Ber.
1993,
126:
1873
15 The exact origin of the observed stereoselectivity is not clear at present, while it might be considered as the result of i) stereoselective formation of benzylic or propargylic chiral carbanion by the diastereoselective carbene insertion to alkyl lithium (B→C) and/or the efficient epimerization
(at C or D), followed by ii) diastereoselective addition reaction via the chelation intermediate (D).
16 The lactol 5 was prepared from pantolactone(racemic) in two steps: benzylation of the hydroxy group with benzyl bromide, half-reduction with DIBAL.
17 The structure of 6 was determined by 1H NMR analysis and IR analysis of its derivatives as shown below (Scheme 11).It is known that the oxetane-3-one displays a carbonyl absorption in the IR spectrum at about 1820 cm-1, see: Thijis L.
Cillissen PJM.
Zwannenburg B.
Tetrahedron
1992,
48:
9985
