Download PDF
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2004; 6(4): 465-476
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820871
Original Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart KG · New York

Succession in Inland Sand Ecosystems: Which Factors Determine the Occurrence of the Tall Grass Species Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth and Stipa capillata L.?

K. Süß1 , C. Storm1 , A. Zehm1 , A. Schwabe1
  • 1Darmstadt University of Technology, Department Vegetation Ecology, Darmstadt, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 July 2004 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In many successional series, grass species play an important role in mid-successional stages. Using calcareous sand ecosystems in the northern upper Rhine valley (Germany) as a model, we analyzed successional trajectories and the factors that determine their direction. A 5- to 7-year study of 23 permanent plots is presented. Polar ordination revealed that succession starts with pioneer communities (dominated by Corynephorus canescens and cryptogams) and can eventually lead to relatively stable Calamagrostis epigejos or Stipa capillata tall grass stands. At some sites, Cynodon dactylon can play a major role, but we focused on the two previously mentioned species. Gradient analyses of their ecological amplitudes by means of principal components and regression analysis were carried out in order to elucidate the factors determining the successional trajectories. Soil analyses of 71 plots established significantly positive linear relations for C. epigejos with respect to total nitrogen, extractable phosphate and potassium, as well as soil moisture indicator values. C. epigejos is not able to spread if the stress factors nutrient deficiency and dryness are combined. Lower tolerance limits are presented. In contrast, S. capillata shows negative relations to phosphate, declining strongly at P contents > 20 mg kg-1. At a moisture indicator value of around 3.2 (indicating dry sites), S. capillata reaches its optimum. S. capillata is a model for a tall grass species which, even with low nutrient levels and dry soil conditions, can be successful in mid-successional phases; but it is displaced by C. epigejos if soil moisture increases or phosphate/potassium supply is higher. Regarding a general framework, the successional phases are characterized by processes such as replacement of species, facilitation, and inhibition.

Key words

Nitrogen - phosphorus - potassium - moisture indicator values - polar ordination - logistic regression - gradient analysis.

References

  • 1 Aerts R. F. S., Chapin III. F. S.. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns.  Advances in Ecological Research. (2000);  30 1-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aerts R. F. S., Huiszoon A., van Oostrum J. M. A., van de Vijver C. A. M., Willems J. M.. The potential for heathland restoration on formerly arable land at a site in Drenthe, The Netherlands.  Journal of Applied Ecology. (1995);  32 827-835
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ambos R., Kandler O.. Einführung in die Naturlandschaft.  Mainzer Naturwissenschaftliches Archiv. (1987);  25 1-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Barkman J. J., Doing H., Segal S.. Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetationsanalyse.  Acta Botanica Neerlandica. (1964);  13 394-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Beals E. W.. Bray-Curtis Ordination.  Advances in Ecological Research. (1984);  14 1-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Berger-Landefeldt U., Sukopp H.. Zur Synökologie der Sandtrockenrasen, insbesondere der Silbergrasflur.  Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg. (1965);  102 41-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bergmann S.. Zum Nährstoffhaushalt in Sandökosystemen der nördlichen Oberrheinebene: Sukzession, Ruderalisierungsprozesse und Effekte von Schafbeweidung. Thesis. Darmstadt; TU Darmstadt (2004): 1-220
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Bolte A.. Canopy thinning, light climate and distribution of Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth in a Scots pine forest (Pinus sylvestris L.).  Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie. (1999);  29 9-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Boot R. G. A., den Dubbelden K. C.. Effects of nitrogen supply on growth, allocation and gas exchange characteristics of two perennial grasses from inland dunes.  Oecologia. (1990);  85 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bornkamm R.. Zu den Standortsbedingungen einiger Sand-Therophytenrasen in Berlin (West).  Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins der Provinz Brandenburg. (1977);  113 27-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bornkamm R., Meyer G., Markan K.. Über die Wirkung von Kronenschluß und Düngung auf die Entwicklung von Waldbodenarten eines Kiefernforstes in Berlin-Spandau.  Phytocoenologia. (1993);  23 601-610
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Brünn S.. Untersuchungen zum Mineralhaushalt von Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth in stickstoffbelasteten Kiefernwäldern.  Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Reihe A. (1999);  160 1-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Brünn S., Gries D., Schmidt W.. Reaktion von Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth auf Unterschiede im Licht- und Stickstoffangebot.  Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie. (1996);  26 775-780
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chapin III F. S., Matson P. A., Mooney H. A.. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. New York; Springer (2002): 1-436
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Collins B., Wein G.. Soil heterogeneity effects on canopy structure and composition during early succession.  Plant Ecology. (1998);  138 217-230
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Conert  (ed.) H. J.. Spermatophyta: Angiospermae: Monocotyledones 1 (2) Poaceae (Echte Gräser oder Süßgräser). Hegi, G., ed. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 1 (3),. Hamburg; Parey Buchverlag (1998): 1-897
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Connell J. H., Slatyer R. O.. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization.  American Naturalist. (1977);  111 1119-1144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dormann C. F.. Sandrohr (Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth) in Trockenrasen des Biosphärenreservates Schorfheide-Chorin: Bestandesstruktur, ökologische Auswirkungen und Pflegemaßnahmen.  Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz. (1997);  6 207-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Egler F. E.. Vegetation science concepts. I. Initial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development.  Vegetatio. (1954);  4 412-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ellenberg H.. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 5. ed. Stuttgart; Ulmer Verlag (1996): 1-989
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Ellenberg H., Weber H. E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Paulißen D.. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 2. ed. Göttingen; Scripta Geobotanica Vol. 18 (1992): 1-258
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Felinks B.. Primärsukzession von Phytocoenosen in der Niederlausitzer Bergbaufolgelandschaft. Thesis. Cottbus; TU Cottbus (2000): 1-196
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Florineth F.. Wasserhaushalt von Stipa pennata ssp. eriocaulis, Stipa capillata und Festuca vallesiaca im Steppengebiet des oberen Vinschgaus.  Oecologia Plantarum. (1974);  9 295-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gleeson S. K., Tilman D.. Allocation and the transient dynamics of succession on poor soils.  Ecology. (1990);  71 1144-1155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Grüttner A.. Zur Keimung und Juvenilentwicklung von Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth.  Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie. (1996);  26 765-773
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Jentsch A., Beyschlag W.. Vegetation ecology of dry acidic grasslands in the lowland area of central Europe.  Flora. (2003);  198 3-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kent M., Coker P.. Vegetation Description and Analysis. Boca Raton; CRC (1992): 1-363
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Kooijman A. M., van der Meulen F.. Grazing as a control against “grass-encroachment” in dry dune grasslands in the Netherlands.  Landscape and Urban Planning. (1996);  34 323-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kooijman A. M., Dopheide J. C. R., Sevink J., Takken I., Verstraten J. M.. Nutrient limitations and their implications on the effects of atmospheric deposition in coastal dunes; lime-poor and lime-rich sites in the Netherlands.  Journal of Ecology. (1998);  86 511-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Köster W.. Beziehung zwischen dem Phosphorgehalt von Kartoffelkraut und Böden.  Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde. (1974);  137 19-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Krause W.. Bestandsveränderungen auf brachliegenden Wiesen.  Das wirtschaftseigene Futter. (1974);  20 51-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Krolupper N., Schwabe A.. Ökologische Untersuchungen im Darmstadt-Dieburger Sandgebiet (Südhessen): Allgemeines und Ergebnisse zum Diasporen-Reservoir und -Niederschlag.  Botanik und Naturschutz in Hessen. (1998);  10 9-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kullmann A.. Über die Wurzelentwicklung und Bestockung von Stipa capillata und Molinia caerulea. .  Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg. (1957);  6 167-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lammerts E. J., Pegtel D. M., Grootjans A. P., van der Veen A.. Nutrient limitation and vegetation changes in a coastal dune slack.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (1999);  10 111-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Leuschner C., Gerlach A.. Akkumulation von organischer Substanz und Nährstoffen im Boden während langfristiger Primär- und Sekundärsukzessionen in Mitteleuropa.  Geobotanisches Kolloqium. (2000);  15 47-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Leuschner C., Rode M. W.. The role of plant resources in forest succession: changes in radiation, water and nutrient fluxes, and plant productivity over a 300-yr-long chronosequence in NW-Germany.  Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. (1999);  2 103-147
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lichter J.. Colonization constraints during primary succession on coastal Lake Michigan sand dunes.  Journal of Ecology. (2000);  88 825-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Marrs R. H., Gough M. W., Griffiths M.. Soil chemistry and leaching losses of nutrients from semi-natural grassland and arable soils on three contrasting parent materials.  Biological Conservation. (1991);  57 257-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McCune B., Grace J. B.. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon; MjM Software Design (2002): 1-300
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Morecroft M. D., Sellers E., Lee J. A.. An experimental investigation into the effects of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on two semi-natural grasslands.  Journal of Ecology. (1994);  82 475-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Oberdorfer E.. Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete, 8. ed. Stuttgart; Eugen Ulmer (2001): 1-1051
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Olff H., Huisman J., van Tooren B. F.. Species dynamics and nutrient accumulation during early primary succession in coastal sand dunes.  Journal of Ecology. (1993);  81 693-706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ponomarev A. N.. Einige Beobachtungen von Stipa capillata in den Steppen vom Hinterural.  Uč. Zap. Molotov. Inst.. (1946);  4 137-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Prach K., Pyšek P.. How do species dominating in succession differ from others?.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (1999);  10 383-392
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Rebele F.. Konkurrenz und Koexistenz bei ausdauernden Ruderalpflanzen. Hamburg; Dr. Kovac (1996): 1-191
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Rebele F., Lehmann C.. Biological flora of Central Europe: Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth.  Flora. (2001);  196 325-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Rychnovská M., Úlehlová B.. Autökologische Studie der tschechoslowakischen Stipa-Arten. Vegetace CSSR A8. Academia Praha (1975): 1-170
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Schaffers A. P., Sýkora K. V.. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (2000);  11 225-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Scheffer. et al. .Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. Heidelberg, Berlin; Spektrum Akademischer Verlag (2002): 1-593
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Schreiber K. F.. Bracheversuche im Langzeitmonitoring in Baden-Württemberg.  Hohenheimer Umwelttagung. (2002);  33 97-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Schwabe A., Storm C., Zeuch M., Kleine-Weischede H., Krolupper N.. Sandökosysteme in Südhessen: Status quo, jüngste Veränderungen und Folgerungen für Naturschutz-Maßnahmen.  Geobotanisches Kolloquium, Frankfurt. (2000);  15 25-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Storm C., Herget I., Kappes J., Vormwald B.. Nährstoffökologische Untersuchungen im Darmstadt-Dieburger Sandgebiet in (teilweise ruderalisierten) Sandpionierfluren und -rasen.  Botanik und Naturschutz in Hessen. (1998);  10 41-85
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Stroh M., Storm C., Zehm A., Schwabe A.. Restorative grazing as a tool for directed succession with diaspore inoculation: the model of sand ecosystems.  Phytocoenologia. (2002);  32 595-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 ten Harkel M. J., van der Meulen F.. Impact of grazing and atmospheric nitrogen deposition on the vegetation of dry coastal dune grasslands.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (1996);  7 445-452
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Thompson K., Bakker J., Bekker R.. The Soil Seed Banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity. Cambridge; University Press (1997): 1-276
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Tilman D.. Nitrogen-limited growth in plants from different successional stages.  Ecology. (1986);  67 555-563
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Tilman D.. Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients.  Ecological Monographs. (1987);  57 189-214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 van Rheenen J. W., Werger M. J. A., Bobbink R., Daniels F. J. A., Mulders W. H. M.. Short-term accumulation of organic matter and nutrient contents in two dry sand ecosystems.  Vegetatio. (1995);  120 161-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 VDLUFA .Methodenbuch Band 1: Die Untersuchung von Böden, 4. ed. Darmstadt; Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (1991)
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Veer M. A. C.. Nitrogen availability in relation to vegetation changes resulting from grass-encroachment in Dutch dry dunes.  Journal of Coastal Conservation. (1997);  3 41-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Veer M. A. C., Kooijman A. M.. Effects of grass-encroachment on vegetation and soil in Dutch dry dune grasslands.  Plant and Soil. (1997);  192 119-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Verhoeven J. T. A., Koerselman W., Meuleman A. F. M.. Nitrogen- or phosphorus-limited growth in herbaceous, wet vegetation: Relations with atmospheric inputs and management regimes.  Trends in Ecology and Evolution. (1996);  11 494-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Walter H., Lieth H.. Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas. Jena; VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag (1967)
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Wedin D. A., Tilman D.. Species effects on nitrogen cycling. A test with perennial grasses.  Oecologia. (1990);  84 433-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Werner W.. Untersuchungen zum Stickstoffhaushalt einiger Pflanzenbestände.  Göttingen: Scripta Geobotanica. (1983);  16 1-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Willems J. H., van Nieuwstadt M. G. L.. Long-term after effects of fertilization on above ground phytomass and species diversity in calcareous grassland.  Journal of Vegetation Science. (1996);  7 177-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Wurbs A., Glemnitz M.. Nährstoffgehalte alter Ackerbrachen auf Sandböden und ihre Bedeutung für die Vegetationsentwicklung.  Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz. (1997);  6 233-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Zehm A.. Analyse der vertikalen Vegetationsstruktur: Methodenentwicklung und Beziehungen zu Pflanzengesellschaften, Mikroklima, Beweidung und Heuschrecken-Gemeinschaften. Thesis. Darmstadt; TU Darmstadt (2003): 1-312
    Google Scholar

A. Schwabe

Darmstadt University of Technology
Department Vegetation Ecology

Schnittspahnstraße 4

64287 Darmstadt

Germany

Email: schwabe@bio.tu-darmstadt.de

Section Editor: M. Riederer