Abstract
In dioecious plants the fraction of males among flowering plants in the field (the secondary sex ratio) is the result of the fraction of males in the seeds (the primary sex ratio) and the subsequent survival and age at first reproduction of the two genders. It has been assumed that survival and age at first reproduction are the main determinants of biased secondary sex ratio but, especially for long-lived perennials, few data are available. We address this issue for natural populations of four long-lived perennials in a dune area. In Asparagus officinale and Bryonia dioica, the secondary sex ratio was unbiased. In Salix repens the secondary sex ratio was female-biased (0.337). Hippophae rhamnoides populations were male-biased; the average sex ratio of flowering plants was 0.658, while the fraction of males varied between 0.39 near the sea to 0.84 at the inland side of the dunes. The primary sex ratio was estimated by germinating seeds and growing plants under favourable conditions with minimal mortality. In S. repens the primary sex ratio in seeds was variable among mother plants and was, on average, female-biased (0.289). This is close to the secondary sex ratio, suggesting that the female bias already originates in the seed stage. In Hippophae rhamnoides the primary sex ratio was slightly male-biased (0.564). We argue that in this species, apart from the primary sex ratio, higher mortality and a later age at first reproduction for females contribute to the strong male bias among flowering plants in the field.
Key words
Succession - sex allocation - seed sex ratio -
Asparagus officinalis
-
Bryonia dioica
-
Hippophae rhamnoides
-
Salix repens.
References
-
1
Alström-Rapaport C., Lascoux M., Gullberg U..
Sex determination and sex ratio in the dioecious shrub Salix viminalis.
.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
(1997);
94
493-497
-
2
Chattopadhyay D., Sharma A. K..
Sex determination in dioecious species of plants.
Feddes Repertorium.
(1991);
102
29-55
-
3 Correns C.. Die Bestimmung und Vererbung des Geslechtes. Berlin; Borntraeger (1907)
-
4 Correns C.. Bestimmung, Vererbung und Verteilung des Geschlechtes bei den höheren Pflanzen. Berlin; Borntraeger (1928)
-
5 Delph L. F.. Sexual dimorphism in live history. Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E., and Delph, L. F., eds. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Berlin; Springer Verlag (1999): 149-174
-
6
Eppley S. M..
Gender-specific selection during early life history stages in the dioecious grass Distichlis spicata.
.
Ecology.
(2001);
82
2022-2031
-
7
Escarré J., Houssard C..
Changes in sex ratio in experimental populations of Rumex acetosella.
.
Journal of Ecology.
(1991);
79
379-388
-
8 Fisher R. A.. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford; Clarendon Press (1930)
-
9
de Jong T. J., van Batenburg F. H. D., van Dijk J..
Seed sex ratio in dioecious plants depends on relative dispersal of pollen and seeds: an example using a chessboard simulation model.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology.
(2002);
15
1-7
-
10
Kay Q. O. N., Stevens D. P..
The frequency, distribution and reproductive biology of dioecious species in the native flora of Britain and Ireland.
Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
(1986);
92
39-64
-
11
Lloyd D. G., Webb C. J..
Secondary sex characters in plants.
Botanical Review.
(1977);
43
177-216
-
12
Marques A. R., Fernandes G. W., Reis I. A., Assuncao R. M..
Distribution of adult male and female Baccharis concinna (Asteraceae) in the rupestrian fields of Serra Do Cipo, Brazil.
Plant Biology.
(2002);
4
4-103
-
13
Martin F. W..
Sex ratio and sex determination in Dioscorea.
.
Journal of Heredity.
(1966);
57
95-99
-
14
Meagher T. R..
Population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious lily. II. Mechanism governing sex ratios.
Evolution.
(1981);
35
557-567
-
15
Obeso R..
The costs of reproduction in plants.
New Phytologist.
(2002);
155
321-348
-
16
Oremus P. A. I., Otten H..
Factors affecting growth and nodulation of Hippophae rhamnoides L. spp. rhamnoides in soils from two successional stages of dune formation.
Plant and Soil.
(1981);
63
317-331
-
17
Pearson M. C., Rogers J. A..
Hippophae rhamnoides L.
Journal of Ecology.
(1962);
50
501-513
-
18
Persson H. A., Nybom H..
Genetic sex determination and RAPD marker segregation in the dioecious species seas buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides).
.
Hereditas.
(1998);
129
45-51
-
19
Shchapov N. S..
On the karyology of Hippophae rhamnoides L.
Tsitologiya i. Genetika.
(1979);
13
45-47
-
20 Siegel S., Castellan Jr. N. J.. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York; McGraw-Hill (1988)
-
21
Taylor D. R..
Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant.
Evolution.
(1999);
53
55-62
-
22 Weeda E. J., Westra R., Westra C., Westra T.. Nederlands Oecologische Flora. Wilde Planten en Hun Relaties 2. Hilversum; IVN/VARA (1987)
-
23
Zoon F. C., Troelstra S. R., Maas P. W. T..
Ecology of the plant-feeding nematode fauna associated with sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L. ssp. rhamnoides) in different stages of dunes succession.
Fundamental Applied Nematology.
(1993);
16
247-258
-
24 Zoon F. C.. Biotic and abiotic soil factors in the succession of sea buckthorn, Hippophae rhamnoides L., in coastal sand dunes. PhD thesis. Wageningen University (1995)
T. J. de Jong
Institute of Biology
Leiden University
P.O. Box 9516
2300 RA Leiden
The Netherlands
Email: dejong@rulsfb.leidenuniv.nl
Section Editor: W. H. van der Putten
