Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826041
Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Polyps of the Small Intestine in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis or with Peutz-Jeghers’ Syndrome
Publication History
Submitted 14 July 2004
Accepted after Revision 8 August 2004
Publication Date:
01 December 2004 (online)
Background and Study Aims: We have conducted a study to compare the diagnostic yields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and capsule endoscopy for the detection of small-bowel polyps in patients with inherited polyposis syndromes.
Patients and Methods: MRI was performed in 20 patients, with either Peutz-Jeghers’ syndrome (PJS; n = 4) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP; n = 16), and capsule endoscopy was done the next day. The number, size, and location of polyps were analyzed.
Results: Overall, 448 polyps ranging from about 1 mm to 30 mm in size were detected in eight patients by capsule endoscopy, whereas with MRI only 24 polyps all bigger than 5 mm could be seen in the four PJS patients.
Conclusions: Polyps bigger than 15 mm were detected similarly with capsule endoscopy and MRI, whereas smaller polyps were seen much more often with capsule endoscopy. Polyps smaller than 5 mm were exclusively seen with capsule endoscopy. However, location of the detected polyps and determination of their exact sizes was more accurate by MRI.
References
- 1 Umschaden H W, Szolar D, Gasser J. et al . Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000; 215 717-725
- 2 Schmidt T, Reinshagen M, Brambs H J. et al . Comparison of conventional enteroclysis, intestinal ultrasound and MRI-enteroclysis for determining changes in the small intestine and complications in patients with Crohn’s disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2003; 41 641-648
- 3 Costamagna G, Shah S K, Riccioni M E. et al . A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123 999-1010
- 4 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 2002; 34 685-689
- 5 Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A. et al . Wireless capsule video endoscopy (CVE) is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow through and computerised tomography (CT) in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003; 15 363-367
- 6 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000; 405 417
- 7 Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Gut. 2003; 52 Suppl 4 48-50
- 8 Schulmann K, Schmiegel W. Capsule endoscopy for small bowel surveillance in hereditary intestinal polyposis and non-polyposis syndromes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004; 14 149-158
- 9 Giardiello F M, Brensinger J D, Tersmette A C. et al . Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz-Jeghers’ syndrome. Gastroenterology.. 2000; 119 1447-1453
- 10 McGarrity T J, Kulin H E, Zaino R J. Peutz-Jeghers’ syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95 596-604
- 11 Parsi M A, Burke C A. Utility of capsule endoscopy in Peutz-Jeghers’ syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.. 2004; 14 159-167
R. Caspari, M. D.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Sigmund Freud Straße 25 · 53105 Bonn · Germany
Fax: + 49-228-2875849
Email: reiner.caspari@ukb.uni-bonn.de