Zusammenfassung
Die kombinierte PET/CT ist eine nicht-invasive bildgebende Methode zur Darstellung anatomischer und molekularer Zusammenhänge durch eine quasi-simultane Untersuchung. Seit der Einführung des PET/CT-Prototypen im Jahr 1998 hat sich die Technologie dieser Bildgebung rasant entwickelt. Die Einführung schneller PET-Detektormaterialien in die PET/CT-Tomographie sowie die Nutzung des CT zur Schwächungskorrektur erlauben onkologische Ganzkörperuntersuchungen in weniger als 30 min. PET/CT bringt auch einen logistischen Vorteil sowohl für den Partienten als auch für den Kliniker, da beide Untersuchungen - soweit klinisch indiziert - quasi-simultan akquiriert werden können und nur ein einziger, integrierter Befund entsteht. Trotzdem gibt es eine Reihe von möglichen methodischen Fehlerquellen, vorrangig durch die CT-basierte Schwächungskorrektur, die jedoch verstanden sind und durch optimierte Akquisitionsprotokolle adressiert werden können. Mittlerweile ist das PET/CT als Bestandteil der diagnostischen Bildgebung etabliert und führt in vielen Fällen zu einer engen Zusammenarbeit der verschiedenen, aber komplementären diagnostischen und therapeutischen Disziplinen der Medizin.
Abstract
Combined PET/CT imaging is a non-invasive means of reviewing both, the anatomy and the molecular pathways of a patient during a quasi-simultaneous examination. Since the introduction of the prototype PET/CT in 1998 a rapid development of this imaging technology is being witnessed. The incorporation of fast PET detector technology into PET/CT designs and the routine use of the CT transmission images for attenuation correction of the PET allow for anato-metabolic whole-body examinations to be completed in less than 30 min. Thus, PET/CT imaging offers a logistical advantage to both, the patient and the clinicians since the two complementary exams - whenever clinically indicated - can be performed almost at the same time and a single integrated report can be created. Nevertheless, a number of pitfalls, primarily from the use of CT-based attenuation correction, have been identified and are being addressed through optimized acquisiton protocols. It is fair to say, that PET/CT has been integrated in the diagnostic imaging arena, and in many cases has led to a close collaboration between different, yet complementary diagnostic and therapeutic medical disciplines.
Schlüsselwörter
PET/CT - Onkologie - Diagnostik - Protokolle
Key words
PET/CT - oncology - diagnostics - protocols
Literatur
1
Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin J F.
To Enhance or Not to Enhance? 18 F-FDG and CT Contrast Agents in Dual-Modality 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
J Nucl Med.
2004;
45 (Suppl)
56S-65S
2
Antoch G, Freudenberg L S, Egelhof T. et al .
Focal Tracer Uptake: A Potential Artifact in Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Modality PET/CT Scans.
J Nucl Med.
2002;
43
1339-1342
3
Antoch G, Kuehl H, Kanja J. et al .
Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: Introduction and evaluation.
Radiology.
2004;
230
879-885
4
Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H. et al .
Accuracy of whole-body PET/CT for tumor staging in solid tumors: Comparison with CT and PET in 260 patients.
Journal of Clinical Oncology.
2004;
22
4357-4361
5
Baum R M, Hofmann M.
Nuklearmedizinische Diagnostik neuroendokriner Tumoren.
Onkologe.
2004;
6
598-610
6 Bendriem B D, Townsend D N. The theory and practice of 3D-PET. In: Cox PH (ed). Developments in Nuclear Medicine. Vol. 32. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1998
7
Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T. et al .
Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2003;
30
588-596
8 Beyer T, Antoch G, Kuehl H, Mueller S P. Acquisition Schemes for Combined F-18-FDG-PET/CT Imaging - A European perspective. In: Czernin J et al. (eds). Atlas of PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Springer, 2004; 30-45
9
Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S. et al .
Acquisition Protocol Considerations for Combined PET/CT Imaging.
J Nucl Med.
2004;
45 (Suppl 1)
25S-35S
10
Beyer T, Antoch G, Rosenbaum S. et al .
Optimized i. v. contrast administration protocols for diagnostic PET/CT imaging.
European Radiology.
2004;
14 (Suppl 2)
422-423
11
Beyer T, Kinahan P E, Townsend D W.
Optimization of emission and transmission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET.
IEEE Transactions in Nuclear Science.
1997;
44
2400-2407
12
Beyer T, Kuehl H, Stattaus J. et al .
Respiration artifacts in whole-body studies with 2nd and 3rd generation PET/CT systems employing multi-row CT technology.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
427P
13
Beyer T, Lechel U, Mueller S P. et al .
Radiation exposure during combined whole-body FDG-PET/CT imaging.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
P426
14
Beyer T, Tellmann L, Nickel I. et al .
Reduced motion artifacts in the head/neck region of whole-body PET/CT studies through the use of positioning aids.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
P428
15
Beyer T, Townsend D W, Brun T. et al .
A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2000;
41
1369-1379
16
Bockisch A, Beyer T, Antoch G. et al .
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography-imaging protocols, artifacts, and pitfalls.
Molecular Imaging and Biology.
2004;
6
188-199
17
Bradley J D, Perez C A, Dehdashti F, Siegel B A.
Implementing Biologic Target Volumes in Radiation Treatment Planning fot Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45 (Suppl 1)
96S-101S
18 Bruckbauer T, Casey M, Valk P E. et al .Optimizing 3D whole body acquisition for oncologic imaging on the ECAT ACCEL LSO PET system. In EANM, Naples 2001
19
Charron M, Beyer T, Bohnen N N. et al .
Image analysis in patients with cancer studied with a combined PET and CT scanner.
Clinical Nuclear Medicine.
2000;
25
905-910
20
Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall L T, Wahl R L.
PET-CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
2003;
30
721-726
21
Comtat C, Kinahan P E, Fessler J A. et al .
Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels.
Physics in Medicine and Biology.
2002;
47
1-20
22
Dahlbom M, Hoffman E J, Hoh C K. et al .
Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography: Part I. Methods and Performance Characteristics.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
1992;
33
1191-1199
23
Di Filippo F, Brunken R, Neumann D. et al .
Initial clinical experience with 82 Rb cardiac PET imaging on a PET/CT system.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
117
24
Dizendorf E, Hany T F, Buck A, Schulthess G K von, Burger C.
Cause and Magnitude of the Error Induced by Oral CT Contrast Agent in CT-Based Attenuation Correction of PET Emission Studies.
J Nucl Med.
2003;
44
732-738
25
Erdi Y E, Nehmeh S A, Pan T. et al .
The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
1287-1292
26
Goerres G, Schmid D, Eyrich G.
Do hardware artefacts influence the performance of head and neck PET scans in patients with oral cavity squamous cell cancer?.
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology.
2003;
32
365-371
27
Goerres G W, Burger C, Schwitter M R. et al .
PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern.
European Radiology.
2003;
13
734-739
28
Goerres G W, Kamel E, Heidelberg T-N H. et al .
PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2002;
29
351-360
29
Goerres G W, Ziegler S I, Burger C. et al .
Artifacts at PET and PET/CT Caused by Metallic Hip Prosthetic Material.
Radiology.
2003;
226
577-584
30
Halpern B S, Dahlbom M, Quon A. et al .
Impact of patient weight and emission scan time duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
797-801
31
Hany T F, Steinert H C, Goerres G W, Buck A, Schulthess G K von.
PET Diagnostic Accuracy: Improvement with In-Line PET-CT System: Initial Results.
Radiology.
2002;
225
575-581
32
Hapdey S, Buvat I, Carrasquillo J, Beegle C, Bacharach S.
Characterization of noise induced by CT-based attenuation correction in PET/CT images.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
413P
33
Hofmann M, Maecke H, Boerner A R. et al .
Biokinetics and imaging with the Somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68 Ga-DOTATOC: Preliminary data.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2001;
28
1751-1757
34
Holm S, Toft P, Jensen M.
Estimation of the noise contributions from blank, transmission and emission scans in PET.
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Sciences.
1996;
43
2285-2291
35
Hutton B F, Braun M.
Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy.
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.
2003;
XXXIII
180-192
36
Kinahan P, Hasegawa B, Beyer T.
X-ray Based Attenuation Correction for PET/CT Scanners.
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.
2003;
XXXIII
166-179
37
Kinahan P E, Townsend D W, Beyer T, Sashin D.
Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner.
Medical Physics.
1998;
25
2046-2053
38
LaCroix K J, Tsui B MW, Hasegawa B H, Brown J K.
Investigantion of the use of X-ray CT images for attenuation correction in SPECT.
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
1994;
41
2793-2799
39
Lartizien C, Comtat C, Kinahan P E. et al .
Optimization of Injected Dose Based on Noise Equivalent Count Rates for 2- and 3-Dimensional Whole-Body PET.
J Nucl Med.
2002;
43
1268-1278
40
Ling C C, Humm J, Larson S. et al .
Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): Biological imaging and biological conformality.
Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys.
2000;
47
551-560
41
Namdar M, Hany T, Siegrist P. et al .
Improved CAD assessment using a combined PET/CT scanner.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
117P-118P
42
Nehmeh S A, Erdi Y E, Ling C C. et al .
Effect of Respiratory Gating on Quantifying PET Images of Lung Cancer.
J Nucl Med.
2002;
43
876-881
43
Nehmeh S A, Erdi Y E, Rosenzweig K E. et al .
Reduction of Respiratory Motion Artifacts in PET Imaging of Lung Cancer by Respiratory Correlated Dynamic PET: Methodology and Comparison with Respiratory Gated PET.
J Nucl Med.
2003;
44
1644-1648
44
Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Fink G. et al .
An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: Validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
1994;
35
2011-2018
45
Pietrzyk U, Herholz K, Heiss W-D.
Three-dimensional alignment of functional and morphological tomograms.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
1990;
14
51-59
46
Schaller S, Semrbitzki O, Beyer T. et al .
An algorithm for virtual extension of the CT field of measurement for application in combined PET/CT scanners.
Radiology.
2002;
225 (Suppl)
497
47 Schelbert H. PET/CT: Imaging function and structure. In: Czernin J (ed). JNM supplement to The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. Vol. 45. Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2004; 1S-103S
48
Schulthess G K von.
Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system.
European Radiology.
2000;
10 (Suppl 3)
S377-S380
49
Surti S J, Karp J S.
Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2004;
45
1040-1046
50
Tang H R, Brown J K, Silva A JD. et al .
Implementation of a combined X-ray CT scintillation camera imaging system for localizing and measuring radionuclide uptake: Experiments in phantoms and patients.
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
1999;
46
551-557
51
Townsend D W, Beyer T, Jerin J. et al .
The ECAT ART scanner for Positron Emission Tomography: 1. Improvements in performance characteristics.
Clinical Positron Imaging.
1999;
2
5-15
52
Townsend D W, Beyer T, Meltzer C C. et al .
The ECAT ART scanner for Positron Emission Tomography: 2. Research and clinical applications.
Clinical Positron Imaging.
1999;
2
17-30
53
Watson C, Casey M, Bendriem B. et al .
A new method for assessing and optimizing clinical 18 F-FDG whole-body PET data quality.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
2003;
44
110-111
54
Woods R P, Cherry S R, Mazziotta J C.
Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
1992;
16
620-633
55
Woods R P, Mazziotta J C, Cherry S R.
MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
1993;
17
536-546
56
Zasadny K R, Kison P V, Quint L Q, Wahl R L.
Untreated lung cancer: Quantification of systematic distortion of tumor size and shape on non-attenuation-corrected 2-[Fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET scans.
Radiology.
1996;
201
873-876
Thomas BeyerPh. D.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · Universitätsklinikum Essen
Hufelandstr. 55
45122 Essen
Telefon: 02 01/7 23/15 28
Fax: 02 01/7 23/59 64
eMail: thomas.beyer@uni-essen.de