PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2005; 26(1): 3-12
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-863789
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Using a Telehealth Medium for Objective Hearing Testing: Implications for Supporting Rural Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs

Mark Krumm1 , John Ribera1 , Jason Schmiedge2
  • 1Department of Communication Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  • 2Kelowna Hearing Aid & Audiology Clinic, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
09. Februar 2005 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Telepractice is commonly used in other health professions to dispense a large number of services. These services include diagnostics, rehabilitation, and counseling. Telepractice is increasingly available to practitioners serving rural areas and can be modified for many health applications. Yet telepractice is not widely used by audiologists. This is somewhat surprising because audiology seems poised to offer telepractice using both synchronous and asynchronous technology. Furthermore, telepractice may be particularly effective for enhancing a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program in rural areas. Specifically, rural communities often lack the proper personnel and program continuity to serve newborns with hearing loss effectively. Telepractice may be a method that can ameliorate these problems. Presently, Utah State University is evaluating the value of telepractice for UNHS services. Initial data obtained from this project are promising and support the validity of telepractice with infant hearing services. However, research with a much larger group of subjects will be required before telepractice can be used with confidence in a UNHS program.

KEYWORDS

Universal newborn hearing screening - telepractice - telehealth - telemedicine - hearing loss

REFERENCES

  • 1 McConnell E. Nursing.  Nursing. 2002;  7 79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Houtchens B, Allen A, Clemmer T, Lindberg D, Pedersen S. Telehealth protocols and standards: development and implementation.  J Med Syst. 1995;  19 93-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 American Speech Language and Hearing Association .Telepractices and ASHA: Report of the Telepractices Team, 2001. Available at: http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/81D8D0EA-F259-44E7-8848-D173178CB693/0/13210_1.pdf. Accessed October 18, 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bashshur R, Reardon T, Shannon G. Telemedicine: a new health care delivery system.  Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;  21 613-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mun S, Turner J. Telemedicine: emerging e-medicine.  Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;  1 589-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wooten R. Recent advances. Telemedicine.  Br Med J. 2001;  323 557-560
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Standberry B. Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century.  J Intern Med. 2000;  247 615-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nadarajah I. Telemedicine Finds Its Way into the Outback. Healthcare Informatics 1999 1: 29 Available at: http://www.healthcare informatics.com/issues/1999/01_99/intl.htm Accessed October 18, 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Stamm B H. Clinical applications of telehealth in mental health care.  Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1998;  29 536-542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nickelson D. Telehealth and the evolving health care system: strategic opportunities for professional psychology.  Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1998;  29 527-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Perednia D A. Telemedicine technology and clinical applications.  JAMA. 1995;  273 483-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ausseresses A. Telecommunications requirements for telehealth.  J Med Syst. 1995;  19 143-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vaughan B, Torok K, Kelly L, Ewing D, Andrews L. Client/server approach to telehealth. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995: 776-780
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Worth E, Patrick T, Klimczak J, Reid J. Cost-effective clinical uses of wide-area networks: electronic mail as telehealth. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995: 814-818
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Office for the Advancement of Telemedicine .Dramatic Consultations Using Telemedicine: Northern California Telemedicine Network (NCTN) Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH). Santa Rosa, CA; Available at: http://telehealth.hrsa.gov/grants/success.htm#aud. Accessed August 15, 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 16 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association . Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice: position statement.  ASHA. 2005;  xx(suppl 25) , In press
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 National Institutes of Health .Consensus statement: early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Bethesda, MD; National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1993 11: 1-24
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Joint Committee on Infant Hearing . Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.  Am J Audiol. 2000;  9 9-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 American Academy of Pediatrics . Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing.  Pediatrics. 1999;  103 527-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mencher G, Davis A, Devoe S, Beresford D, Bamford J. Universal neonatal screening: past, present and future.  Am J Audiol. 2001;  10 3-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 O'Neal J, Finitzo T, Littman T. Neonatal hearing screening: follow-up and diagnosis. In: Roeser, Valente, Hosford-Dunn Audiology Diagnosis New York; Thieme 2000: 530
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Schmiedge J. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing using telemedicine technology [masters thesis]. Minot State University; 1997: 1-92
    Google Scholar

Mark Krumm

1000 Old Main Hill, Dept. of Communication Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University

Logan, UT 84322-1000

eMail: mkrumm@cc.usu.edu