ABSTRACT
Telepractice is commonly used in other health professions to dispense a large number of services. These services include diagnostics, rehabilitation, and counseling. Telepractice is increasingly available to practitioners serving rural areas and can be modified for many health applications. Yet telepractice is not widely used by audiologists. This is somewhat surprising because audiology seems poised to offer telepractice using both synchronous and asynchronous technology. Furthermore, telepractice may be particularly effective for enhancing a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program in rural areas. Specifically, rural communities often lack the proper personnel and program continuity to serve newborns with hearing loss effectively. Telepractice may be a method that can ameliorate these problems. Presently, Utah State University is evaluating the value of telepractice for UNHS services. Initial data obtained from this project are promising and support the validity of telepractice with infant hearing services. However, research with a much larger group of subjects will be required before telepractice can be used with confidence in a UNHS program.
KEYWORDS
Universal newborn hearing screening - telepractice - telehealth - telemedicine - hearing loss
REFERENCES
-
1
McConnell E.
Nursing.
Nursing.
2002;
7
79
-
2
Houtchens B, Allen A, Clemmer T, Lindberg D, Pedersen S.
Telehealth protocols and standards: development and implementation.
J Med Syst.
1995;
19
93-120
-
3 American Speech Language and Hearing Association .Telepractices and ASHA: Report of the Telepractices Team, 2001. Available at: http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/81D8D0EA-F259-44E7-8848-D173178CB693/0/13210_1.pdf.
Accessed October 18, 2003
-
4
Bashshur R, Reardon T, Shannon G.
Telemedicine: a new health care delivery system.
Annu Rev Public Health.
2000;
21
613-637
-
5
Mun S, Turner J.
Telemedicine: emerging e-medicine.
Annu Rev Biomed Eng.
1999;
1
589-610
-
6
Wooten R.
Recent advances. Telemedicine.
Br Med J.
2001;
323
557-560
-
7
Standberry B.
Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century.
J Intern Med.
2000;
247
615-627
-
8 Nadarajah I. Telemedicine Finds Its Way into the Outback. Healthcare Informatics 1999 1: 29 Available at: http://www.healthcare informatics.com/issues/1999/01_99/intl.htm Accessed October 18, 2003
-
9
Stamm B H.
Clinical applications of telehealth in mental health care.
Prof Psychol Res Pr.
1998;
29
536-542
-
10
Nickelson D.
Telehealth and the evolving health care system: strategic opportunities for professional psychology.
Prof Psychol Res Pr.
1998;
29
527-535
-
11
Perednia D A.
Telemedicine technology and clinical applications.
JAMA.
1995;
273
483-488
-
12
Ausseresses A.
Telecommunications requirements for telehealth.
J Med Syst.
1995;
19
143-152
-
13 Vaughan B, Torok K, Kelly L, Ewing D, Andrews L. Client/server approach to telehealth. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995: 776-780
-
14 Worth E, Patrick T, Klimczak J, Reid J. Cost-effective clinical uses of wide-area networks: electronic mail as telehealth. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care 1995: 814-818
-
15 Office for the Advancement of Telemedicine .Dramatic Consultations Using Telemedicine: Northern California Telemedicine Network (NCTN) Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH). Santa Rosa, CA; Available at: http://telehealth.hrsa.gov/grants/success.htm#aud.
Accessed August 15, 2004
-
16
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .
Audiologists providing clinical services via telepractice: position statement.
ASHA.
2005;
xx(suppl 25)
, In press
-
17 National Institutes of Health .Consensus statement: early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Bethesda, MD; National Institutes of Health Consensus Statement 1993 11: 1-24
-
18
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing .
Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.
Am J Audiol.
2000;
9
9-29
-
19
American Academy of Pediatrics .
Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing.
Pediatrics.
1999;
103
527-530
-
20
Mencher G, Davis A, Devoe S, Beresford D, Bamford J.
Universal neonatal screening: past, present and future.
Am J Audiol.
2001;
10
3-12
-
21 O'Neal J, Finitzo T, Littman T. Neonatal hearing screening: follow-up and diagnosis. In: Roeser, Valente, Hosford-Dunn Audiology Diagnosis New York; Thieme 2000: 530
-
22 Schmiedge J. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions testing using telemedicine technology [masters thesis]. Minot State University; 1997: 1-92
Mark Krumm
1000 Old Main Hill, Dept. of Communication Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University
Logan, UT 84322-1000
Email: mkrumm@cc.usu.edu
