ABSTRACT
Treatment strategy in infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) largely depends on clinical neurological examination and the degree of improvement in the first 3 months. Usually, less severe lesions show early recovery within a few months, and prognosis for spontaneous recovery is good. However, sometimes the time course of improvement may differ and will not allow clinical differentiation from more severe types of lesions with less favorable prognosis. Ancillary preoperative investigations assist in determining the type, level, and extent of the nerve lesion. The role of electrodiagnosis in preoperative assessment of OBPP is depreciated by many, whereas others stress the importance of combining results from electromyography and nerve action potential recording to discriminate between a nerve conduction block and a root avulsion or to predict the severity of axonal injury or degeneration. There is no role for motor-evoked potentials in OBPP yet. For imaging of the brachial plexus in infants, magnetic resonance imaging has surpassed computed tomography-myelography as modality of choice. High-strength magnetic resonance scanners, applying different techniques in a noninvasive way, allow imaging of plexus structures with great detail. Detection of different nerve lesion types is possible, such as root avulsions or nerve ruptures, formation of pseudomeningoceles, neuromas, or scarring as well as deformities of the shoulder joints. Magnetic resonance imaging is becoming a great aid as a preoperative investigation in determining treatment strategy in infants with severe OBPP.
KEYWORDS
Brachial plexus neuropathies - electrodiagnosis - diagnostic imaging
REFERENCES
-
1
Clarke H M, Curtis C G.
An approach to obstetrical brachial plexus injuries.
Hand Clin.
1995;
11
563-580
-
2
Gilbert A, Tassin J L.
Réparation chirurgicale du plexus brachial dans la paralysie obstétricale.
Chirurgie.
1984;
110
70-75
-
3
Laurent J P, Lee R T.
Birth-related upper brachial plexus injuries in infants: operative and non-operative approaches.
Child Neurol.
1994;
9
111-117
-
4 Boome R S. Indications and timing of surgery for obstetric brachial plexus palsies. In: Vastamäki M Current Trends in Hand Surgery: Proceedings of the 6th Congress of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand, Helsinki Finland New York; Elsevier 1995: 275-277
-
5 Gilbert A. Indications and strategy. In: Gilbert A Brachial Plexus Injuries. London; Martin Dunitz 2001: 205-210
-
6 Sunderland S. Nerve Injuries and Their Repair: A Critical Appraisal. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1991
-
7 Birch R, Bonney G, Wynn Parry C B. Birth lesions of the brachial plexus. In: Birch R, Bonney G, Wynn Parry CB Surgical Disorders of the Peripheral Nerves. London; Churchill Livingstone 1998: 209-233
-
8
Weinstein D E.
The role of Schwann cells in neural regeneration.
Neuroscientist.
1999;
5
208-216
-
9
Smith S JM.
The role of neurophysiological investigation in traumatic brachial plexus injuries in adults and children.
J Hand Surg [Br].
1996;
21
145-148
-
10
Grossman J A.
Early operative intervention for birth injuries to the brachial plexus.
Semin Pediatr Neurol.
2000;
7
36-43
-
11
Shenaq S M, Berzin E, Lee R, Laurent J P, Nath R, Nelson M R.
Brachial plexus birth injuries and current management.
Clin Plast Surg.
1998;
25
527-536
-
12
Slooff A CJ.
Obstetrical brachial plexus lesions and their neurosurgical treatment.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
1993;
95(suppl)
S73-S77
-
13
Dijk van J G.
Pondaag W, Malessy JA: Obstetric lesions of the brachial plexus.
Muscle Nerve.
2001;
24
1451-1461
-
14
Vredeveld J W, Richards R, Rozeman C AM, Blaauw G, Slooff A CJ.
The electromyogram in obstetric brachial plexus palsy is too optimistic: fiber size or another explanation?.
Muscle Nerve.
1999;
22
427-428
-
15
Paradiso G, Granana N, Maza E.
Prenatal brachial plexus paralysis.
Neurology.
1997;
49
261-262
-
16
Ouwerkerk van W JR, Sluijs van der J A, Nollet F, Barkhof F, Slooff A CJ.
Management of obstetric brachial plexus lesions: state of the art and future developments.
Childs Nerv Syst.
2000;
16
638-644
-
17 Vredeveld J W. Clinical neurophysiological investigations. In: Gilbert A Brachial Plexus Injuries. London; Martin Dunitz 2001: 39-44
-
18
Hesselmans L FGM, Jennekens F GI, Oord van den C JM, Veldman H, Vincent A.
Development of innervation of skeletal muscle fibers in man: relation to acetylcholine receptors.
Anat Rec.
1993;
236
553-563
-
19
Ijkema-Paassen J, Gramsbergen A.
Polyneural innervation in the psoas muscle of the developing rat.
Muscle Nerve.
1998;
21
1058-1063
-
20 Smith S JM. Electrodiagnosis. In: Birch R, Bonney G, Wynn Parry CB Surgical Disorders of the Peripheral Nerves London; Churchill Livingstone 1998: 467-490
-
21
Turkof E, Millesi H, Turkof R, Pfundner P, Mayr N.
Intraoperative electrodiagnostics (transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials) to evaluate the functional status of anterior spinal roots and spinal nerves during brachial plexus surgery.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
1997;
99
1632-1641
-
22
Carvalho G A, Nikkah G, Matthies C, Penkert G, Samii M.
Diagnosis of root avulsions in traumatic brachial plexus injuries: value of computerized tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging.
J Neurosurg.
1997;
86
69-76
-
23
Oberle J, Antoniadis G, Rath S A et al..
Radiological investigations and intra-operative evoked potentials for the diagnosis of nerve root avulsion: evaluation of both modalities by intradural root inspection.
Acta Neurochir (Wien).
1998;
140
527-531
-
24
Hoeksma A F, ter Steeg A M, Dijkstra P F, Nelissen G GHH, Beelen A, de Jong B A.
Shoulder contracture and osseous deformity in obstetrical brachial plexus injuries.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2003;
85
316-322
-
25 Slooff A CJ, Versteege C WM, Blaauw G, van Ouwerkerk W JR. The brachial plexus: radiological and related investigations. In: Gilbert A Brachial Plexus Injuries London; Martin Dunitz 2001: 31-38
-
26
Miller S F.
Glasier ChM, Griebel ML, Boop FA: Brachial plexopathy in infants after traumatic delivery: evaluation with MR imaging.
Radiology.
1993;
189
481-484
-
27
Francel P C, Koby M, Park T S et al..
Fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for radiological assessment of brachial plexus injury.
J Neurosurg.
1995;
83
461-466
-
28
Walker A T, Chaloupka J C, de Lotbiniere A CJ, Wolfe S W, Goldman R, Kier E L.
Detection of nerve rootlet avulsion on CT myelography in patients with birth palsy and brachial plexus injury after trauma.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1996;
167
1283-1287
-
29
Hashimoto T, Mitomo M, Hirbuki N et al..
Nerve root avulsion of birth palsy: comparison of myelography with CT myelography and somatosensory evoked potentials.
Radiology.
1991;
178
841-845
-
30
Birchansky S.
Altman Nolan: imaging the brachial plexus and peripheral nerves in infants and children.
Semin Pediatr Neurol.
2000;
7
15-25
-
31
Filler A G, Kliot M, Howe F A et al..
Application of magnetic resonance neurography in the evaluation of patients with peripheral nerve pathology.
J Neurosurg.
1996;
85
299-309
-
32
Sluijs van der J A, Ouwerkerk van W JR, Gast de A, Wuisman P IJM, Nollet F, Manoliu R A.
Deformities of the shoulder in infants younger than 12 months with an obstetric lesion of the brachial plexus.
J Bone Joint Surg Br.
2001;
83
551-555
-
33
van der Sluijs J A, van Ouwerkerk W J, de Gast A, Wuisman P, Nollet F, Manoliu R A.
Retroversion of the humeral head in children with an obstetric brachial plexus lesion.
J Bone Joint Surg Br.
2002;
84
583-587
-
34
Gasparotti R, Ferraresi S, Pinelli L et al..
Three-dimensional MR myelography of traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
1997;
18
1733-1742
-
35
Gupta R K, Mehta V S, Banerji A K, Jain R K.
MR evaluation of brachial plexus injuries.
Neuroradiology.
1989;
31
377-381
W.J. R van OuwerkerkM.D.
Department of Neurosurgery, VU University Medical Center
P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
