An Approach to Electrodiagnosis of Peripheral Neuropathies

ABSTRACTS

Peripheral neuropathies are the most common neuromuscular disorder seen by neurologists. Determining full features and characteristics based on history and physical examination alone can be difficult. Electrodiagnostic testing is an extension of the neurological examination and can assist in full characterization and provide unique information on underlying pathological processes. This article presents a practical approach to electrodiagnostic testing in patients with peripheral neuropathies.

Peripheral neuropathies - electrodiagnostic testing - nerve conduction studies - EMG

REFERENCES

• 1 Bromberg M, Smith A. Toward an efficient method to evaluate peripheral neuropathies.  J Clin Neuromusc Dis. 2002;  3 172-182
• 2 Smith A, Bromberg M. A rational diagnostic approach to peripheral neuropathy.  J Clin Neuromusc Dis. 2003;  4 190-198
• 3 Bromberg M, Spiegelberg T. The influence of active electrode placement on CMAP amplitude.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;  105 385-389
• 4 Rosenfalck A. Early recognition of nerve disorders by near-nerve recording of sensory action potentials.  Muscle Nerve. 1978;  1 360-367
• 5 Carleton S, Brown W. Changes in motor unit populations in motor neurone disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979;  42 42-51
• 6 Thiele B, Böhle A. Anzahl der Spike-Komponenten im Motor-Unit Potential.  EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1978;  9 125-130
• 7 Nandedkar S, Sanders D, Stålberg E. EMG of reinnervated motor units: a simulation study.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;  70 177-184
• 8 Stewart C, Nandedkar S, Massey J, Gilchrist J, Barkhaus P, Sanders D. Evaluation of an automatic method of measuring features of motor unit action potentials.  Muscle Nerve. 1989;  12 141-148
• 9 Engstrom J, Olney R. Quantitative motor unit analysis: the effect of sample size.  Muscle Nerve. 1992;  15 277-281
• 10 Holland N, Stocks A, Hauer P, Cornblath D, Griffin J, McArthur J. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density in patients with painful sensory neuropathy.  Neurology. 1997;  48 708-711
• 11 Albers J, Donofrio P, McGonagle T. Sequential electrodiagnostic abnormalities in acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.  Muscle Nerve. 1985;  8 528-539
• 12 Bromberg M. Comparison of electrodiagnostic criteria for primary demyelination in chronic polyneuropathy.  Muscle Nerve. 1991;  14 968-976
• 13 Latov N. Diagnosis of CIDP.  Neurology. 2002;  59(suppl 6) S2-S6
• 14 Pestronk A, Cornblath D, Ilyas A et al.. A treatable multifocal motor neuropathy with antibodies to GM1 ganglioside.  Ann Neurol. 1988;  24 73-78
• 15 Lange D, Trojaborg W, Latov N et al.. Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block: is it a distinct clinical entity?.  Neurology. 1992;  42 497-505
• 16 Kimura J. Principles and pitfalls of nerve conduction studies.  Ann Neurol. 1984;  16 415-429
• 17 Oh S. Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. 3rd ed. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2003
• 18 Donofrio P, Albers J. AAEM minimonograph #34: Polyneuropathy: classification by nerve conduction studies and electromyography.  Muscle Nerve. 1990;  13 889-903
• 19 Wolfe G, Baker N, Amato A et al.. Chronic crytogenic sensory polyneuropathy. Clinical and laboratory characteristics.  Arch Neurol. 1999;  56 540-547
• 20 Smith A, Singleton J. The diagnostic yield of a standardized approach to idiopathic sensory-predominant neuropathy.  Arch Intern Med. 2004;  164 1021-1025
• 21 Herrmann D, Ferguson M, Logigian E. Conduction slowing in diabetic distal polyneuropathy.  Muscle Nerve. 2002;  26 232-237
• 22 Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in Diseases of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia; FA Davis Company 2001