Download PDF
Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2006; 14(1): 51-53
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-921367
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

The Introduction of an Artificial Ligament for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Department's Critical Review of Complications and Problems

C. Gäbler1 , R. Schmidt1 , M. Schurz1 , S. Orthner1 , V. Vécsei1
  • 1Department of Traumatology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 March 2006 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: We reviewed the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). The aim of the study was to analyze the outcome. Methods: From 2000 to 2002 26 patients with an acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament were operated using the LARS ligament and underwent a routine examination at a minimum of one year after surgery. The follow-up sheets of these clinical controls were analyzed. Results: Eleven patients (42.3 %) required a reoperation. Another seven patients (27 %) complained either of massive loss of flexion, extension deficit, persistent pain or persisting anterior knee instability with giving way attacks, however, they declined to undergo a reoperation. Two infections occurred (8 %). This left us with a 69 % rate of postoperative problems and complications. Another four patients (15.4 %) had knee laxity (Lachmann positive), but no subjective instability problems. Conclusion: The main reason for this high rate of complications might be the inhomogeneous group of nine different surgeons with varying levels of experience. The complication rate also represents the learning curve of the unit. However, we do not suggest using this artificial ligament for routine operations of the anterior cruciate ligament due to the high rate of postoperative problems and complications.

Key words

anterior cruciate ligament - reconstruction - synthetic augmentation - knee - arthroscopy

References

  • 1 Dahlstedt L, Dalen N, Jonsson U. Goretex prosthetic ligament vs. Kennedy ligament augmentation device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized 3-year follow-up of 41 cases.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;  61 217-224
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dericks G. Ligament advanced reinforcement system anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Op Tech Sports Med. 1995;  3 187-205
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 DiGiovine N M, Shields C L. Synthetic ligaments in ACL reconstruction: a review.  Am J Knee Surg. 1991;  4 42-48
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Drogset J O, Grontvedt T. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without a ligament augmentation device. Results at 8-year follow-up.  Am J Sports Med. 2002;  30 851-856
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Semert N, Kohler K, Karlsson J. Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up.  Am J Sports Med. 2003;  31 19-25
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Feagin J A. Physical Examination of the Knee. In: Garret WE, Speer KP, Kirkendall DT (eds). Principles and Practice of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2000; 613-622
  • 7 Feller J A, Webster K E. A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Am J Sports Med. 2003;  31 564-573
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Grontvedt T, Engebretsen L, Benum P, Fasting D, Molster A, Strand T. A prospective, randomized study of three operations for acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Five-year-follow-up of one hundred and thirty-one patients.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1996;  78 159-168
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kiefer H, Richter M, Hehl G. Augmentationstechniken: Sind sie out?.  Zentralbl Chir. 1998;  123 1002-1013
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hurley M V. The effects of joint damage on muscle function, proprioception and rehabilitation.  Man Ther. 1997;  2 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Jansson K A, Linko E, Sandelin J, Harilainen A. A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.  Am J Sports Med. 2003;  31 12-18
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J. Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts.  Arthroscopy. 2001;  17 971-980
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Katayama M, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi A, Hatayarna K, Terauchi M, Takagishi K. Proprioception and performance after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.  Int Orthop. 2004;  28 278-281
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kennedy J C, Roth J U, Mendenhall H V, Sanford J B. Intraarticular replacement in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.  Am J Sports Med. 1980;  8 1-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kumar K, Maffuli N. The ligament augmentation device: An historical perspective.  J Arthrosc Rel Surg. 1999;  15 422-432
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Lobenhoffer P, Tscherne H. Die Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Heutiger Behandlungsstand.  Unfallchirurg. 1993;  96 150-168
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 MacDonald P B, Hedden D, Pacin O, Sutherland K. Proprioception in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees.  Am J Sports Med. 1996;  24 774-778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mendenhall H V, McPherson G F, Gibbons D F, Plenk H, Rottmann W, Sanford J B, Grussing D M, Kennedy J C. Evaluation of the ligament augmentation device after two year implantation in goats.  Proc Soc Biomaterials. 1983;  59 6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Muren O, Dahlstedt L, Dalen N. Reconstruction of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a prospective randomised study of 40 patients with 7-year follow-up.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003;  123 144-147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Nau T, Lavoie P, Duval N. A new generation of artificial ligaments in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Two year follow-up of a randomized trial.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 2002;  84 356-360
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Strobel M J. Manual of Arthroscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, New York, Tokio 1998; 367-570
  • 22 Svensson M, Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Lindahl S, Karlsson J. Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third?.  Am J Sports Med. 2004;  32 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Torg J S, Conrad W, Kalen V. Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability of the athlete.  Am J Sports Med. 1976;  4 84-93
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Trieb K, Blahovec H, Brand G, Sabeti M, Dominkus M, Kotz R. In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligaments.  Eur Surg Res. 2004;  36 148-151
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. C. GäblerM. D., PhD 

Department of Traumatology · University of Vienna Medical School

Währinger Gürtel 18-20

1090 Wien

Austria

Email: christian.gaebler@meduniwien.ac.at