PDF herunterladen
Viszeralchirurgie 2007; 42(3): 134-144
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-960735
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Grundlagen und Biologie der Anastomosenheilung

Basic Principles and Biology of Anastomotic Healing in the Gastrointestinal TractG. Meyer1 , R. A. Lang2 , P. M. Prodinger1 , C. Stier1
  • 1Abt. für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik München-Bogenhausen
  • 2Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik - Großhadern, Klinikum der Universität München
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. Juni 2007 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die regelhaft ablaufende Anastomosenheilung am Gastrointestinaltrakt entspricht im Wesentlichen den Mechanismen der Wundheilung. Sie verläuft in drei sich überlappenden Phasen, aber schneller als die allgemeine Wundheilung. Ausgelöst werden diese Vorgänge durch das chirurgische Trauma. Folge jeder Anastomosierung ist eine mehr oder weniger ausgeprägte Entzündungsreaktion, die ihr Maximum in den ersten sieben Tagen erreicht. Das Ausmaß der Entzündung bestimmt entscheidend den Ablauf der Heilung. Dementsprechend können die einzelnen Phasen in Ausprägungsgrad und Dauer variieren. Makrophagen spielen regulativ eine entscheidende Rolle. Die exsudative Phase ist geprägt durch ein Ödem und die Exsudation von Fibrin und Blutbestandteilen mit Einwanderung von Entzündungszellen sowie Fibrinstabilisierung. In der proliferativen Phase findet die Bindegewebseinsprossung mit Gefäß- und Fibroblastenproliferation sowie Kollagenbildung statt. Die reparative Phase ist durch die Stabilisierung des Kollagens mit Reorganisation der Darmwandschichten charakterisiert. Resultat ist immer eine Defektheilung mit Narbenbildung. Im Zusammenhang mit dem Kollagenstoffwechsel kommt es bis zum dritten bis vierten Tag zu einem deutlichen Stabilitätsverlust. Nach 14 Tagen wird schließlich auch ohne unterstützendes Nahtmaterial eine ausreichende Stabilität erreicht.

Abstract

Anastomotic healing of the gastrointestinal tract corresponds basically the mechanisms of wound healing in general. There are as well three overlapping phases, but restitution is faster than regular wound healing. The surgical trauma causes the inition of this process. Anastomotic suture is followed by a more or less severe pronounced inflammatoric reaction, that reaches its maximum within the first seven days. The range of the inflammatoric reaction determines essentially the process of healing. Depending on this, phases can vary in occurrence and duration. Macrophages play the most important role in regulation. The exsudative phase is minted by edema and exsudation of fibrin and other blood components. Additionally there is an invasion of inflammatoric cells. Stabilisation of the fibrin clot takes place. The following proliferative phase showes germination of connective tissue, fibroblastic proliferation and synthesis of collagen as well as neovascularisation. The reparative phase finally is characterized by stabilisation and maturation of collagen and results in reorganisation of the bowel's walls. The outcome is always a defect healing with scar formation. Concerning the collagen-metabolism, there is a notable loss in stability till the third to forth postoperative day. After fourteen days stability is sufficient without the need of supporting suture material.

Schlüsselwörter

Anastomose - Anastomosenheilung - Gastrointestinaltrakt - Phasen der Wundheilung - Anastomoseninsuffizienz

Key words

anastomosis - anastomotic healing - gastrointestinal-tract - phases of wound healing - anastomotic leak

Literatur

  • 1 Ellison G W. Wound healing in the gastrointestinal tract.  Semin Vet Med Surg. 1989;  4 287-293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Brasken P, Lehto M, Renwall S. Fibronectin, laminin, and collagen types I, III, IV and V in the healing rat colon anastomosis.  Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1990;  79 65-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Leder L D. Wundheilung und Fremdkörperreaktion. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmaterialen und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 226-228
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Meyer G, Lang R A, Schildberg F W. Anastomosenheilung.  Viszeralchirurgie. 2000;  35 153-165
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ravitch M M, Canalis F, Weinshelbaum A, McCormick J. Studies in intestinal healing: III. Observations on everting intestinal anastomoses.  Ann Surg. 1967;  166 670-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zoedler T H, Becker H, Röher H D. Die fortlaufende einreihige Anastomose als Standardverfahren im Gastrointestinaltrakt.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 50-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zederfeldt B, Jiborn H, Blomquist P. Effects of different suture techniques on healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 110-121
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Langer S, Kupczyk D. Entstehung der Nahtinsuffizienz.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1982;  358 253-258 ,  (Kongressbericht)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Beickert R, Imhoff C von. Nahtinsuffizienz am Dickdarm: Ist der Operateur ein Risikofaktor?.  Chirurg. 1984;  55 645-649
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Curley S A, Allison D C, Smith D E, Doberneck R C. Analysis of techniques and results in 347 consecutive colon anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1988;  155 597-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Golub R, Golub R W, Cantu R, Stein H D. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomosis.  Am Coll Surg. 1997;  184 364-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sorensen L T, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby L T, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P. Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg. 1999;  86 927-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stumpf M, Klinge U, Mertens P R. Anastomosenheilung - Prognostische Faktoren.  Chirurg. 2004;  75 1056-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stumpf M, Klinge U, Wilms A. et al . Changes of the extracellular matrix as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after large bowel surgery.  Surgery. 2005;  137 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Meyer G, Lang R A, Schildberg F W. Einflussfaktoren auf die Anastomosenheilung.  Viszeralchirurgie. 2001;  36 49-68
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jacobs G, Ulrich B. Klammernahtgeräte am Magen und Dünndarm.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1981;  355 465-469
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Onodera H, Ikeuchi D, Nagayama S, Imamura M. Weakness of anastomotic site in diabetic rats is caused by changes in the integrity of newly formed collagen.  Dig Surg. 2004;  21 146-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Halsted W S. Circular suture of the intestine - an experimental study.  Am J Med Sci. 1887;  94 436-461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Junginger T H, Pichlmaier H. Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Kolonchirurgie. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 288-295
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Kerscher P, Wünsch H P, Lehmann L, Eich J. Ist die alleinige Naht der Submukosa eine Alternative zu den bisherigen Nahttechniken?. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 135-144
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Epstein E H, Munderloch N H. Isolation and characterization of CNBr peptides of human collagen and tissue distribution of collagens.  J Biol Chem. 1975;  250 9304-9312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Spjut H J. Microangiographic study of gastrointestinal lesions.  Am J Roentgenol. 1974;  92 1173-1187
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Abramowitz H B, McAlister W H. A comparative study of small-bowel anastomoses by angiography and microangiography.  Surgery. 1969;  66 564-569
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stelzner F. Vorbeugung der intraperitonealen Nahtinsuffizienz (Dünn- und Dickdarm).  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1982;  358 259-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Martens M FWC, Hendriks T. Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel.  Gut. 1991;  32 1482-1487
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wise L, McAlister W, Stein T, Schuck P. Studies on the healing of anastomoses of small and large intestines.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;  141 190-194
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nahai F, Lamb J M, Havican R G, Stone H H. Factors involved in disruption of intestinal anastomoses.  Am Surg. 1977;  43 45-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Martens M FWC, Hendriks T. Collagen synthesis in explants from rat intestine.  Biochem Biophys Acta. 1989;  993 252-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cohn I, Nance F C. Physiology. In: Sabiston DC (ed). Textbook of Surgery. 12th Ed. Saunders, Philadelphia 1981; 1069-1070
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Cronin K, Jackson D S, Dunphy J E. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;  126 747-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Hofstädter F. Pathologie der Wundheilung.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 174-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1978;  136 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hastings J C, van Winkle W, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and the colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;  140 701-707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Thompson S K, Chang E Y, Jobe B A. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I.  Microsurgery. 2006;  26 131-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chlumsky V. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die verschiedenen Methoden der Darmvereinigung.  Bruns Beitr Klin Chir. 1899;  25 539-600
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Diegelmann R F, Cohen I K, Kaplan A H. The role of macrophages in wound repair: A review.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;  68 107-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Assoian R K, Fleurdelys B E, Stevenson H C. et al . Expression and secretion of type-β transforming growth factor by activated human macrophages.  Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1987;  84 6020-6024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Austgulen R, Hammerstom J, Nissen-Meyer J. In vitro cultured human monocytes release fibroblast proliferation factor(s) different from interleukin 1.  J Leukoc Biol. 1987;  42 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bittermann B P, Rennard S I, Hunninghake G W, Crystal R G. Human alveolar macrophage growth factor for fibroblasts: Regulation an partial characterization.  J Clin Invest. 1982;  70 806-822
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Calderon J, Williams R T, Unanue E R. An inhibitor of cell proliferation released by cultures of macrophages.  Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1974;  71 4273-4277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Jordana M, Newhouse M T, Gauldie J. Alveolar macrophage / peripheral blood monocyte-derived factors modulate proliferation of primary lines of human lung fibroblasts.  J Leukoc Biol. 1987;  42 51-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Leibovich S J, Ross R. A macrophage-dependent factor that stimulates the proliferation of fibroblasts in vitro.  Am J Pathol. 1976;  84 501-513
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Martin B M, Gimbrone Jr  M A, Unanue E R, Cotran R S. Stimulation of nonlymphoid mesenchymal cell proliferation by a macrophage derived growth factor.  J Immunol. 1981;  126 1510-1515
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Metzger Z, Hoffeld J T, Oppenheim J J. Suppression of fibroblast proliferation by activated macrophages: Involvement of H2O2 an a non-prostaglandin E product of the cyclooxygenase pathway.  Cell Immunol. 1986;  100 501-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Phan S M, McGarry B M, Loeffler K M, Kunkel S L. Regulation of macrophages-derived fibroblast growth factor release by arachidonate metabolites.  J Leukoc Biol. 1987;  42 106-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sugarman B J, Lewis G D, Eessalu T E, Aggarwal B B, Shepard H M. Effects of growth factors on the antiproliferative activity of tumor necrosis factors.  Cancer Res. 1987;  47 780-786
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Wharton W, Gillespie G Y, Russel S W, Pledger W J. Mitogenic activity elaborated by macrophage-like cell lines acts as competence factor(s) for BALB / c 3 T 3 cells.  J Cell Physiol. 1982;  110 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Hernandez-Richter H J, Struck H. (Hrsg) .Die Wundheilung. Theoretische und praktische Grundlagen. Thieme, Stuttgart 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Lindner J. Morphologie und Biochemie der Wundheilung (Kongressbericht 1982).  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1982;  358 153-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Nockemann P F. (Hrsg) .Die chirurgische Naht. 3. Auflage. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York 1980
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Kozol R A, Mulligan M, Downes R J, Forouhar F A, Kreutzer D L. Early colonic anastomotic edema. Evaluation of stapled vs hand-sewn anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;  31 503-506
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Leder L D. Wundheilung und Fremdkörperreaktion. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmateralien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 226-228
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Hesp W LEM, Hendriks T, Schillings P HM, Lubbers E JC, De Boer H HM. Histological features of wound repair: a comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses.  Br J Exp Path. 1985;  66 511-518
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Irvin T T. Wound healing. Principle and Practice. Chapman and Hall, London 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Peacock E E, van Winkle W. (eds) .Wound repair. 2nd Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Barbul A, Caldwell M, Hunt T K. (eds) .Growth factors and other aspects of wound healing: Biological and clinical implications. Progr in Clin and Biol Research. Vol 266. Alan Liss, New York 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Brasken P, Renvall S, Sandberg M. Expression of epidermal growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor genes in healing colonic anastomoses in rats.  Eur J Surg. 1991;  157 607-611
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Enestvedt C K, Thompson S K, Chang E Y, Jobe B A. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part II.  Microsurgery. 2006;  26 137-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Gartner M H, Benson J D, Caldwell M D. Insulin-like growth factors I and II expression in the healing wound.  J Surg Res. 1992;  52 389-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Jimenez S A, McArthur W, Rosenbloom J. Inhibition of collagen synthesis by mononuclear cell supernates.  J Exp Med. 1979;  150 1421-1431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Kingsnorth A N, Vowles R, Nash J RG. Epidermal growth factor increases tensile strength in intestinal wounds in pigs.  Br J Surg. 1990;  77 409-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Laato M, Kähäri V M, Niinikoski J, Vuorio E. Epidermal growth factor increases not by activation of procollagen genes.  Biochem J. 1987;  247 385-388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Mateo R B, Reichner J S, Albina J E. Interleukin-6 activity in wounds.  Am J Physiol. 1994;  35 R 1840-R 1844
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Rappolee D A, Mark D, Bandha M J, Werb Z. Wound macrophages express TGF-a and other growth factors in vivo. Analysis by mRNA phenotyping.  Science. 1988;  241 708-712
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Bary S von. Klinische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Wundheilung des Dickdarmes unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der gewebeständigen Fibrinolyse und Kollagenolyse. Habilitationsschrift, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München 1979
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Brown L F, Dvorak A M, Dvorak H F. Leaky vessels, fibrin deposition, and fibriosis: A sequence of events common to solid tumors and to many other types of disease.  Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;  140 1104-1107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Ciano P S, Colvin R B, Dvorak A M, McDonagh J, Dvorak H F. Macrophage migration in fibrin gel matrices.  Lab Invest. 1986;  54 62-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Le Veen H H, Wapnick S, Falk G. et al . Effects of prophylactic antibiotics on colonic healing.  Am J Surg. 1976;  131 47-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Hawley P R, Faulk W P, Hunt T K, Dunphy J E. Collagenase activity in the gastro-intestinal tract.  Br J Surg. 1970;  57 896-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Albini A, Adelmann-Grill B C. Collagenolytic cleavage products of collagen type I as chemoattractants for human dermal fibroblasts.  Eur J Cell Biol. 1985;  36 104-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Dayer J M, Zavadil-Grob C, Ucla C, Mach B. Induction of human interleukin 1 mRNA measured by collagenase - and prostaglandin E 2-stimulating activity in rheumatoid synovial cells.  Eur J Immunol. 1984;  14 898-901
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Hawley P R. Causes and prevention of colonic anastomotic breakdown.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1973;  16 272-277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Beneficial effect of proteinase inhibitors on early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 529-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Högström H, Haglund U. Neutropenia prevents decrease in strength of rat intestinal anastomosis: Partial effect of oxygen free radical scavengers and allopurinol.  Surgery. 1986;  99 716-720
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Irvin T T, Hunt T K. Reappraisal of the healing process of anastomosis of the colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;  138 741-746
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Jonsson T H, Högström H. Neutrophil-dependent decrease in early wound margin strength.  Arch Surg. 1991;  126 1423-1426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippmann H. Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Clinical and experimental aspects.  Am J Surg. 1972;  123 104-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Ohlsson K. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte collagenase. In: Woolley D, Evanson J (eds). Collagenase in normal and pathological connective tissue. Wiley, Chichester 1980; 209-222
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Seller A, Murphy G. Collagenolytic enzymes and their naturally occurring inhibitors.  Int Rev Connect Tissue Res. 1981;  9 151-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Starkey P H. Elastase and cathepsin G. In: Barrett AJ (ed). The serine proteinases of human neutrophil leucocytes and spleen. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1977; 57-89
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Virca G D, Metz G, Schnebli H P. Similarities between human and rat leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G.  Eur J Biochem. 1984;  144 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Young H L, Wheeler M H. Results of a prospective randomized doubleblind trial of aprotinin in colonic surgery.  Wold J Surg. 1984;  8 367-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Bary S von, Kortmann H, Köpcke W. Berstungsdrucke des enterotomierten Rattencolons unter Proteinaseinhibition.  Res Exp Med. 1976;  168 123-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Högström H, Haglund U. Postoperative decrease in suture holding capacity in laparotomy wounds and anastomoses.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 533-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Högström H, Haglund U. Early decrease in suture line breaking strength. The effect of proposed collagenase inhibition.  Res Exp Med. 1985;  185 451-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Murphy G, Sellers A. The extracellular regulation of collagenase activity. In: Barrett AJ (ed). Proteinases in mammalian cells and tissues. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1977; 1-9
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Sommerville R P, Oblander S A, Apte S S. Matrix metalloproteinases: old dogs with new tricks.  Genome Biol. 2003;  4 216-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Syk I, Agren M S, Adawi D, Jeppsson B. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases enhances breaking strength of colonic anastomoses in an experimental model.  Br J Surg. 2001;  88 228-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Murphy G, Reynolds J J. Current views of collagen degradation. Progress towards understanding the resorption of connective tissues.  Bio Essays. 1985;  2 55-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Ryan G B, Majno G. Acute inflammation.  Am J Pathol. 1977;  86 183-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Chowcat N L, Savage F J, Hembry R M, Boulos P B. Role of collagenase in colonic anastomoses: a reappraisal.  Br J Surg. 1988;  75 330-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. III. Collagen metabolism in the colon after left colon resection.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 398-405
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Högström H, Hagelund U, Zederfeldt B. Suture technique and early breaking strength of intestinal anastomoses and laparotomy wounds.  Acta Chir Scand. 1985;  151 441-443
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Jonsson T H, Högström H. Diathermy-induced inflammation does not affect suture holding capacity of intestinal anastomoses.  Eur Surg Res. 1991;  23 235-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. IV. Effect of suture technique on collagen metabolism in the colonic wall.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Stromberg B V, Klein L. Collagen formation during the healing of colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;  25 301-304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Adamson R, Enquist I F. The relative importance of sutures to the strength of healing wounds under normal and abnormal conditions.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;  117 396-401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Golden T, Levy A H, O'Conner W T. Primary healing of skin wounds and incisions with a threadless suture.  Am J Surg. 1962;  104 603-609
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Howes E L, Sooy J W, Harvey S C. The healing of wounds as determined by their tensile strength.  JAMA. 1929;  92 42-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Mechanische Belastbarkeit von Dünndarmanastomosen mit und ohne Fäden. In: Thiede A, Hamelmann H (Hrsg). Moderne Nahtmaterialien und Nahttechniken in der Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982; 145-150
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Breaking strength of small intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1983;  145 800-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Scheele J. Grundlagen der Anastomosenheilung. In: Scheele J (Hrsg). Fibrinklebung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo 1984; 115-119
    Google Scholar
  • 103 Zederfeldt B. Anastomotic Healing. In: Eigler FW, Gross E, Vogt E (Hrsg). Die Anastomose am Gastrointestinaltrakt. TM, Hameln, 1990; 13-16
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Healey Jr J E, Mc Bride C M, Gallager H S. Is serosa-to-serosa approximation necessary in intestinal anastomosis.  Surg Forum. 1964;  15 297-299
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Kerscher P, Wünsch H, Steidl H. Naht der Submucosa bei der Dickdarmanastomose.  Chirurg. 1979;  50 770-774
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Lord M G, Broughton A C, Williams H TG. A morphologic study on the effect of suturing the submucosa of the large intestine.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;  146 211-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Changes in collagen content of the small intestinal wall after anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1985;  150 315-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Jönsson T H, Högström H. Neutrophil-dependent decrease in early wound margin strength.  Arch Surg. 1991;  126 1423-1426
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Fellows N M, Burge J, Hatch G S, Prince P B. Suture strength and healing strength of end to end intestinal anastomoses.  Surg Forum. 1951;  3 111-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Vance J FA, Williams H TG. Mechanical support of healing small intestinal anastomoses by adhesions.  Can J Surg. 1972;  15 101-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Ascherl R, Scherer M, Stemberger A, Weichenmeier I, Blümel G. Zusätzliche Nahtsicherung am Kolon mit verschiedenen Techniken der Fibrinklebung - experimentelle Untersuchungen an der Ratte. In: Scheele J (Hrsg). Fibrinklebung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo 1984; 120-126
    Google Scholar
  • 112 Gilmore O JA, Rosin R D, Exarchakos G, Ellis H. Colonic anastomoses healing. The effect of tropical povidone-iodine.  Eur Surg Res. 1978;  10 94-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Hastings J C, van Winkle W, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and the colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;  140 701-707
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Adamson R J, Musco F, Enquist I F. The chemical dimensions of a healing incision.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966;  123 515-521
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Cronin K, Jackson D S, Dunphy J E. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968;  126 747-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Jönsson K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Collagen metabolism in small intestinal anastomoses.  Am J Surg. 1987;  154 288-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Thies H A, Richter U. Erworbener F XIII-Mangel und klinische Chirurgie.  Med Welt. 1981;  32 250-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Martens M FWC, Hendriks T. Collagen synthesis in explants from rat intestine.  Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989;  993 252-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Hesp F LEM, Hendriks T, Lubbers E JC, De Boer H HM. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. A comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 99-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Prockop D J, Kivirikko K I, Tuderman L, Guzman N A. The biosynthesis of collagen and its disorders.  New Engl J Med. 1979;  301 13-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Delaney P, Lalor D. Enzyme inhibition in colorectal surgery.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 23-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Högström H, Haglund U, Zederfeldt B. Beneficial effect on intestinal anastomoses of S-2441, a synthetic kallikrein-kinin antagonist. Experimental studies in the rat.  Am J Surg. 1985;  150 312-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Young H L, Wheeler M H. Collagenase inhibition in the healing colon.  J R Soc Med. 1983;  76 32-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Leibovich S J, Ross R. The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum.  Am J Pathol. 1975;  78 71-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Sugarmann B J, Lewis G D, Eessalu T E, Aggarwal B B, Shepard H M. Effects of growth factors on the antiproliferative activity of tumor necrosis factors.  Cancer Res. 1987;  47 780-786
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Booth C C, Mc Intyre I, Mollin D L. Nutritional problems associated with extensive lesions of the distal small intestine in man.  Quart J Med. 1964;  33 401-420
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Ehrlich H P. Regulation der Wundheilung aus der Sicht des Bindegewebes.  Chirurg. 1995;  66 165-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Fietzek P, Kühn K. The primary structure of collagen. In: Hall AH, Jackson DS (eds). International Review of Connective Tissue Research, Vol. 7. Academic Press, New York, San Francisco, London 1976; 1-60
    Google Scholar
  • 129 Peterkofsky B. Ascorbate requirement for hydroxylation and secretion of procollagen: relationship to inhibition of collagen synthesis in scurvy.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;  54 1135 S-1140 S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Brasen P, Letho M, Renvall S. Changes in the connective tissue composition of the submucosal layer of colonic anastomosis.  Acta Chir Scand. 1989;  155 413-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Hubens G, Pauwels M, Hubens A, Vermeulen P, van Marck E, Eyskens E. The influence of a pneumoperitoneum on the peritoneal implantation of free intraperitoneal colon cancer cells.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10 809-812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Hudemann H. Chirurgisches Nahtmaterial. Fischer, Jena 1959
    Google Scholar
  • 133 Bailey A J, Sims T J, Le Louis M, Bazin S. Collagen polymorphism in experimental granulation tissue.  Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1975;  66 1160-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Lünstedt B. Moderne Nahtmaterialien in der Kolonchirurgie. Zuckschwerdt, München, Bern, Wien, New York 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 135 Blomquist R, Ahonen J, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Collagen synthesis and content in the colonic wall after left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat.  Acta Chir Scand. 1984;  150 677-681
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Irvin T T, Edwards J P. Comparison of single-layer inverting, two-layer inverting, and everting anastomoses in the rabbit colon.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 453-457
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Khoury G A, Waxman B P. Large bowel anastomoses. I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses. A review.  Br J Surg. 1983;  70 61-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Panton O NM, Smith J A, Bell G A, Forward A D, Murphy J, Doyle P W. The incidence of wound infection after stapled or sutured bowel anastomosis and stapled or sutured skin closure in humans and guinea pigs.  Surgery. 1985;  98 20-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Brasken P. Healing of experimental colon anastomosis.  Eur J Surg. 1991;  157 (Suppl 566) 1-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 140 Brasken P, Renvall S, Sandberg M. Fibronectin and collagen gene expression in healing experimental colonic anastomoses.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1048-1052
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. IV. Effect of suture technique on collagen metabolism in the colonic wall.  Am J Surg. 1980;  139 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Gay S, Martin G R, Muller P K, Timpl R, Kuhn K. Simultaneous synthesis of types I and III collagen by fibroblasts in culture.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1976;  73 4037-4040
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Winkel op den R. Primäre Dickdarmanastomosen bei Peritonitis. Eine Kontraindikation?. Hefte Unfallheilkunde Bd. 188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 144 Herzog B. Die Darmnaht. Eine tierexperimentelle Studie und Erfahrungen mit einer eigenen Nahttechnik. Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie, Bd 20. Huber, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Houdart R, Lavergne A, Valleur P, Villet R, Hautefeuille P. Vascular evolution of single-layer end-on colonic anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 475-480
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Jansen A, Becker A E, Brummelkamp W H, Keeman J N, Klopper P J. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 51-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Schäfer K, Göller M, Stanka P, Ernst R, Zumtobel V. Revaskularisation von Kolonanastomosen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;  376 163-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: the effect of suture technic on collagen concentration in the colonic wall.  Am J Surg. 1978;  135 333-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Myllärniemi H. Healing and adhesion formation of peritoneal wounds. An angio-, histoangiographic and ultrastructural study.  Acta Chir Scand. 1973;  139 258-263
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Hansen H, Sommer H J, Eichelkraut W. Die Durchblutung handgenähter und geklammerter Colonanastomosen.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1987;  370 141-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 151 Nakanishi H. Experimental gut anastomosis and their revascularization.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1975;  45 309-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 152 Shikata J, Shida T. Experimental studies by the resin-casting method on the vascular structure of the colon following stapler anastomosis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 341-346
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 153 Myllarniemi H, Karppinen V. Vascular pattern of peritoneal adhesions.  Br J Surg. 1968;  55 605-608
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 154 Hernandez-Richter H J, Struck H. Wundheilung und ihre Störungen, Chrirurgische Infektionen. In: Lindenschmidt TO (Hrsg). Pathophysiologische Grundlagen der Chirurgie, 2. Auflage. Thieme, Stuttgart 1975; 124-135
    Google Scholar
  • 155 Langer S, Pesendorfer H, Breining H, Cen M. Klinische und tierexperimentelle Studien zur Anastomosentechnik in der Darmchirurgie.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1974;  335 309-320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 156 Waninger J, Kauffmann G, Schmidt J, Gorenflo M. Mikroangiographische Befunde experimenteller Darmanastomosen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1987;  147 87-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 157 Braucher R E, Kirsner J B. Regeneration of colon mucosa: A morphologic and histochemical study.  Gastroenterology. 1962;  42 706-717
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 158 Ellison G W, Jokinen M P, Park R D. End-to-end approximating intestinal anastomoses in the dog: a comparative fluorescein dye, angiographic and histopathologic evaluation.  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1982;  18 729-736
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 159 Houdart R, Lavergne A, Galian A, Hautefeuille P. Evolution anatomopathologique des anastomoses digestives bord à bord en un plan. Etude de 210 anastomoses coliques chez le rat du 2e au 180e jour.  Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1983;  7 465-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 160 Nusrat A, Parkos C A, Bacarra A E. et al . Hepatocyte growth factor / scatter factor effects on epithelia. Regulation of intracellular junctions in transformed and nontransformed cell lines, basolateral polarization of c-met receptor in transformed and natural intestinal epithelia, and induction of rapid wound repair in a transformed model epithelium.  J Clin Invest. 1994;  93 2056-2065
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 161 Garner A, Hargreaves A W, Keddie N C. Colonic anastomoses: A histopathological study in the rabbit.  Br J Surg. 1969;  56 673-676
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 162 Abercrombie M, Flint M H, James D W. Wound contraction in relation to collagen formation in scorbutic guinea-pigs.  J Embryol Exp Morph. 1956;  4 167-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 163 Winkle van Jr  W. Wound contraction.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967;  125 131-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 164 Müller G, Kieninger G, Breucha G, Bustamente I, Neugebauer W. Vergleichende Untersuchungen ein- und zweireihiger Anastomosen am Schweinedünndarm.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1978;  346 37-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 165 Kurkinen M, Vaheri A, Roberts P J, Stenman S. Sequential appearance of fibronectin and collagen in experimental granulation tissue.  Lab Invest. 1980;  43 47-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 166 Herrmann J B, Woodward S C, Pulaski E J. Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;  119 269-275
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 167 Lamesch A, Dociu N. Die mikrochirurgische Darmnaht: Untersuchungen am Rattendarm.  Z Kinderchir. 1977;  21 263-274
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 168 Schäfer K, Loeweneck H, Stanka H, Ernst R, Zumtobel V. Mikrozirkulationsstörungen bei Colonanastomosen und ihre Bedeutung für die Pathogenese der Nahtinsuffizienz.  Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1990;  375 24-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 169 Polglase A L, Hughes E SR, McDermott F T, Burke F R. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;  152 792-796
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 170 Ravitch M M. Observations on the healing of wounds of the intestines.  Surgery. 1975;  77 665-673
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 171 John S, Fleischer F, Häring R. The enteroanastomosis: a micro-angiographic study of anastomotic healing.  Chir Gastroent. 1976;  10 165-173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 172 Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis.  Am J Surg. 1978;  136 587-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 173 Hendriks T, Mastboom W JB. Healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses: parameters für repair.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 891-901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 174 Miller E J, Gay S. Collagen structure and function. In: Cohen IK, Diegelman RF, Lindblad WJ (eds). Wound healing: Biochemical and clinical aspects. Saunders, Philadelphia 1992; 130-151
    Google Scholar
  • 175 Mast B A. Healing in other tissues.  Surg Clin North Am. 1997;  77 529-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Priv. Doz. Dr. med. G. Meyer

Chefarzt der Abteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie · Chirurgische Klinik München-Bogenhausen

Denninger Str. 44

81679 München

Telefon: 0 89/92 79 45 00

Fax: 0 89/92 79 45 02

eMail: dr.meyer@chkmb.de