Endoscopy 2007; 39(12): 1053-1058
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-967014
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnosis and treatment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding using combined capsule endoscopy and double balloon endoscopy: 1-year follow-up study

S.  Fujimori1 , T.  Seo1 , K.  Gudis1 , S.  Tanaka1 , K.  Mitsui1 , T.  Kobayashi1 , A.  Ehara1 , M.  Yonezawa1 , A.  Tatsuguchi1 , C.  Sakamoto1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 27 January 2007

accepted after revision 27 September 2007

Publikationsdatum:
10. Dezember 2007 (online)

Background and study aims: Several studies have shown the value of capsule endoscopy and double balloon endoscopy (DBE) in small-intestinal bleeding. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of capsule endoscopy results on subsequent DBE examination, and the 1-year clinical outcome of this combined approach in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).

Patients and methods: A total of 45 consecutive patients with OGIB underwent capsule endoscopy. Patients with positive capsule endoscopy results underwent DBE for biopsy or therapy, and those with negative results underwent further assessment for possible diagnostic misses on capsule endoscopy. Tumors, ulcerations, and vascular lesions were considered as sources of bleeding. Diagnoses of OGIB lesions and clinical outcome were assessed 1 year after these examinations.

Results: Responsible lesions were found in 22 patients (49 %): 19 lesions in 18/45 patients (40 %) undergoing capsule endoscopy, and 18/36 patients (50 %) undergoing subsequent DBE. In all, 10 tumors, nine vascular lesions, and four ulcerations were found. In two patients, vascular lesions were only later diagnosed by conventional methods (4 %). Capsule endoscopy results guided our choice of the proper DBE model for successful therapeutic intervention in five patients. Re-bleeding rates were low during 1-year follow-up of the entire group (mean follow-up, 18.8 months): 5 % in cases with positive diagnoses on capsule endoscopy and/or DBE, and 12 % in negative cases.

Conclusions: A combined approach using capsule endoscopy followed by DBE proves valuable in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with OGIB, leaves a low rate of undiagnosed bleeding sources, and has a good long-term outcome.

References

  • 1 Zuckerman G R, Prakash C, Askin M P, Lewis B S. AGA technical review on the evaluation and management of occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastroenterology. 2000;  118 201-221
  • 2 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653
  • 3 Swain P, Adler D, Enns R. Capsule endoscopy in obscure intestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 655-659
  • 4 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 685-689
  • 5 Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gut. 2003;  52 1122-1126
  • 6 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Gaudin J L. et al . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 576-584
  • 7 Mata A, Bordas J M, Feu F. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparative study with push enteroscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;  20 189-194
  • 8 Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Moriyama T. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 827-832
  • 9 Neu B, Ell C, May A. et al . Capsule endoscopy versus standard test in influencing management of obscure digestive bleeding: results from a German multicenter trial.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 1736-1742
  • 10 Hadithi M, Heine G D, Jacobs M A. et al . A prospective study comparing video capsule endoscopy with double-ballon enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastoenterol. 2006;  101 52-57
  • 11 Yamamoto H, Kita H. Enteroscopy.  J Gastroenterol. 2005;  40 555-562
  • 12 Nakamura M, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N. et al . Preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 59-66
  • 13 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Vahedi K. et al . Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 318-323
  • 14 Viazis N, Papaxoinis K, Theodoropoulos I. et al . Impact of capsule endoscopy in obscure small-bowel bleeding: defining strict diagnostic criteria for a favorable outcome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 717-722
  • 15 Bresci G, Parisi G, Bertoni M. et al . The role of video capsule endoscopy for evaluating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: usefulness of early use.  J Gastroenterol. 2005;  40 256-259
  • 16 Hartmann D, Schmidt H, Bolz G. et al . A prospective two-center study comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with intraoperative enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 826-832
  • 17 Nakamura T. When is the optimal timing for performing video capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?.  J Gastroenterol. 2005;  40 322-323
  • 18 Gay G, Delvaux M, Fassler I. Outcome of capsule endoscopy in determining indication and route for push-and-pull enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 49-58

S. Fujimori, MD

Department of Internal Medicine

Division of Gastroenterology

Nippon Medical School

1-1-5 Sendagi

Bunkyo-ku

Tokyo 113-8603

Japan

Fax: +81-3-5685-1793

eMail: s-fujimori@nms.ac.jp