Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2007; 21(3): 159-166
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-991184
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Laser Treatment of Pediatric Vascular Lesions

Patrick D. Cole1 , Michael L. Sonabend2 , Moise L. Levy3
  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 2Department of Dermatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 3Dermatology Services and Birthmark Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 November 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Since its introduction in 1967, laser therapy has benefited patients and physicians alike. After the first clinical application by Goldman (Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Science 1983;220:524-527), laser therapy has become indispensable in the management of vascular birthmarks. In selecting a proper balance of wavelength, pulse duration, and energy density (fluence), the physician can mold laser energy to effectively manage lesions once considered untreatable. Now, the vast array of lesions amenable to laser therapy continues to expand. By advancing our understanding of both laser technology and vascular lesion biology, the goal of providing optimal clearance with minimal morbidity moves ever closer.

KEYWORDS

Laser therapy - vascular lesions - fluence - pulse duration - wavelength - energy density

REFERENCES

  • 1 Anderson R R, Parrish J A. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation.  Science. 1983;  220 524-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Arndt K A. Argon laser therapy of small cutaneous vascular lesions.  Arch Dermatol. 1982;  118 220-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dixon J A, Huether S, Rotering R H. Hypertrophic scarring in argon laser treatment of portwine stains.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  73 771-780
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chang C J, Nelson J S. Cryogen spray cooling and higher fluence pulsed dye laser treatment improve port-wine stain clearance while minimizing epidermal damage.  Dermatol Surg. 1999;  25 767-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Apfelberg D B, Maser M R, Lash H, Rivers J. The argon laser for cutaneous lesions.  JAMA. 1981;  245 2073-2075
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Geronemus R G. Argon laser for the treatment of cutaneous lesions.  Clin Dermatol. 1995;  13 55-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 No D, Dierick C, McClaren M et al.. Pulsed alexandrite treatment of bulky vascular malformations.  Lasers Surg Med. 2003;  15 26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Apfelberg D B. Argon-pumped tunable dye laser.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 394-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rohrer T E, Chatrath V, Iyengar V. Does pulse stacking improve results with variable-pulse pulsed dye lasers?.  Dermatol Surg. 2004;  30 163-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Anderson R R, Ross E V. Laser-tissue interactions. In: Fitzpatrick MP, Goldman MP Cosmetic Laser Surgery. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 2000: 109-115
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Levine V J, Geronemus R G. Adverse effects associated with the 577- and 585-nanometer pulsed dye laser in the treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions: a study of 500 patients.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;  32 613-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Garden J M, Polla L L, Tan O T. The treatment of port-wine stains by the pulsed dye laser. Analysis of pulse duration and long-term therapy.  Arch Dermatol. 1998;  124 889-896
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tan O T, Sherwood K, Gilchrest B A. Treatment of children with portwine stains using the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  320 416-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fitzpatrick R E, Lowe N J, Goldman M P et al.. Flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;  20 743-748
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sommer S, Sheehan-Dave R A. Pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stains in pigmented skin.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;  42 667-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Waldorf H A, Alster T S, McMillan K et al.. Effect of dynamic cooling on 585-nm pulsed dye laser treatment of port-wine stain birthmarks.  Dermatol Surg. 1997;  23 657-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Renfro L, Geronemus R G. Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser.  Arch Dermatol. 1993;  129 182-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lou W W, Geronemus R G. Treatment of port-wine stains by variable pulsed width pulsed dye laser with cryogen spray: a preliminary study.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 963-965
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dierickx C C, Casparian J M, Vengopalan V, Farinelli W A, Anderson R R. Thermal relaxation of port-wine stain vessels probed in vivo: the need for 1-10 millisecond laser pulse treatment.  J Invest Dermatol. 1995;  105 709-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Uebelhoer N S, Bogle M A, Dover J S, Rohrer T E, Arndt K A. Comparison of KTP (532nm Gemini) with pulsed dye laser (595nm, V-Beam) in the treatment of facial telangiectasia and redness. Unpublished data
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Butler E G, McClellan S D, Ross E V. Split face treatment of photodamaged skin with a 10 mm spot KTP laser vs IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison.  Lasers Surg Med. 2006;  38 124-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yang M U, Yaroslavsky A N, Farinelli W A et al.. Long pulsed Nd:YAG treatment for port wine stains.  Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;  52 480-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Parlette E C, Groff W F, Kinshella M J, Domankevitz Y, Ross E V. Optimal pulse durations for the treatment of leg telangiectasias with a neodymium YAG laser.  Lasers Surg Med. 2006;  17 342-347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Iyer S, Fitzpatrick R E. Long-pulsed dye laser treatment for facial telangiectasias and erythema: evaluation of a single purpuric pass versus multiple subpurpuric passes.  Dermatol Surg. 2005;  31 898-902
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lupton J R, Alster T S, Romero P. Clinical comparison of sclerotherapy versus long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment for lower extremity telangiectases.  Dermatol Surg. 2002;  28 694-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Goldberg D J, Meine J G. A comparison of four frequency-doubled Nd:YAG (532 nm) laser systems for treatment of facial telangiectasias.  Dermatol Surg. 1999;  25 463-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Negishi K, Kushikata N, Tezuka Y et al.. Study of the incidence and nature of very subtle epidermal melasmaQ in relation to intense pulsed light treatment.  Dermatol Surg. 2004;  30 881-886
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Negishi K, Tezuka Y, Kushikata N, Wakamatsu S. Photorejuvenation for Asian skin by intense pulsed light.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 627-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dover J S, Bhatia A C, Stewart B, Arndt K A. Adjunctive use of topical aminolevulinic acid with intense pulsed light in the treatment of photoaging.  Arch Dermatol. 2005;  141 1247-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Burton B K, Schulz C J, Angle B, Burd L I. An increased incidence of hemangiomas in infants born following chorionic villus sampling (CVS).  Prenat Diagn. 1995;  15 209-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 David L R, Malek M M, Argenta L C. Efficacy of pulse dye laser therapy for the treatment of ulcerated hemangiomas: a review of 78 patients.  Br J Plast Surg. 2003;  56 317-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sadick N S. A dual wavelength approach for laser/intense pulsed light source treatment of lower extremity veins.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;  46 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kaudewitz P, Klovekorn W, Rother W. Effective treatment of leg vein telangiectasia with a new 940 nm diode laser.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Dover J S, Sadick N S, Goldman M P. The role of lasers and light sources in the treatment of leg veins.  Dermatol Surg. 1999;  25 328-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kauvar A NB. The role of lasers in the treatment of leg veins.  Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2000;  19 245-252
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Sadick N S. Long-term results with a multiple synchronized-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of leg venulectasias and reticular veins.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 365-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Goldman M P. Laser and sclerotherapy treatment of leg veins: my perspective on treatment outcomes.  Dermatol Surg. 2002;  28 969-970
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Massey R A, Katz B E. Successful treatment of spider leg veins with a high-energy, long-pulse, frequency-doubled neodymium:YAG laser (HELP-G).  Dermatol Surg. 1999;  25 677-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Passeron T, Olivier V, Duteil L et al.. The new 940-nanometer diode laser: an effective treatment for leg venulectasia.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;  48 768-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bernstein E F. Clinical characteristics of 500 consecutive patients presenting for laser removal of lower extremity spider veins.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 31-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lai C H, Hanson S G, Mallory S B. Lymphangioma circumscriptum treated with pulsed dye laser.  Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;  18 509-510
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Weingold D H, White P F, Burton C S. Treatment of lymphangioma circumscriptum with tunable dye laser.  Cutis. 1990;  45 365-366
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bekhor P. Lasers in Dermatology.  Aust Fam Physician. 1992;  21 577-580
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Telenkov S A, Dave D P, Sethuraman S, Akkin T, Milner T E. Differential phase optical coherence probe for depth-resolved detection of photothermal response in tissue.  Phys Med Biol. 2004;  49 111-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Choi B, Majaron B, Nelson J S. Computational model to evaluate port wine stain depth profiling using pulsed photothermal radiometry.  J Biomed Opt. 2004;  9 299-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Sivarajan V, Mackay I R. Noninvasive in vivo assessment of vessel characteristics in capillary vascular malformations exposed to five pulsed dye laser treatments.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  115 1245-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Zhang R, Verkruysse W, Choi B et al.. Determination of human skin optical properties from spectrophotometric measurements based on optimization by genetic algorithms.  J Biomed Opt. 2005;  10 024030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Eubanks L E, McBurney E I. Videomicroscopy of port-wine stains: correlation of location and depth of lesion.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;  44 948-951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Cuccia D J, Bevilacqua F, Durkin A J, Tromberg B J. Modulated imaging: quantitative analysis and tomography of turbid media in the spatial-frequency domain.  Opt Lett. 2005;  30 1354-1356
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Jung B, Choi B, Durkin A J, Kelly K M, Nelson J S. Characterization of port wine stain skin erythema and melanin content using cross-polarized diffuse reflectance imaging.  Lasers Surg Med. 2004;  34 174-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Choi B, Ramirez-San-Juan J C, Lotfi J, Stuart Nelson J. Linear response range characterization and in vivo application of laser speckle imaging of blood flow dynamics.  J Biomed Opt. 2006;  11 041129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Patrick D ColeM.D. 

Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

1709 Dryden, Suite 1600, BCM Mail Stop: 340, Houston, TX 77030

      >