RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027727
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Is Contrast-Enhanced US Alternative to Spiral CT in the Assessment of Treatment Outcome of Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
Kontrastmittelsonografie als Alternative zum Spiral-CT bei der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolg nach Radiofrequenzablation des hepatozellulären Karzinoms?Publikationsverlauf
received: 1.8.2007
accepted: 8.7.2008
Publikationsdatum:
11. März 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Die vorliegende Studie diente dem Ziel, die Wertigkeit der Kontrastmittelsonografie mit niedrigem mechanischem Index bei der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs der perkutanen Radiofrequenzablation des hepatozellulären Karzinoms im Vergleich mit dem 4-zeiligen Spiral-CT zu ermitteln. Material und Methoden: 100 aufeinanderfolgend vorgestellte Patienten (65 Männer und 35 Frauen, Alter: 62 – 76 Jahre) mit hepatozellulärem Karzinom (mittlere Tumorgröße 3,7 ± 1,1 cm SD) wurden mit gekühlter Radiofrequenzablation behandelt. Das Behandlungsergebnis wurde einen Monat nach dem Eingriff mit kontrastmittelgestütztem Dreiphasen-Spiral-CT sowie der Kontrastmittelsonografie mit niedrigem mechanischem Index nach Injektion eines Bolus von 2,4 ml SonoVue (Bracco, Mailand) untersucht. 60 von 100 Patienten wurden 3 Monate später nachuntersucht. Die kontrastgestützten Sonografieaufnahmen wurden von zwei verblindeten Radiologen zusammen begutachtet. Sensitivität, Spezifität, NPV und PPV der Kontrastmittelsonografie wurden ermittelt. Ergebnisse: Nach der Behandlung stellte die Kontrastmittelsonografie eine persistierende Signalverstärkung bei 24 Patienten dar (24 %), wohingegen bei den übrigen 76 Patienten (76 %) keine Anreicherung innerhalb des Tumors festgestellt werden konnte. Im Vergleich mit dem CT als Goldstandard lagen Sensitivität, Spezifität, NPV, and PPV der Kontrastmittelsonografie bei 92,3 % (95 % CI = 75,9 – 97,9 %), 100 % (95 % CI = 95,2 – 100 %), 97,4 % (95 % CI = 91,1 – 99,3 %) und 100 % (95 % CI = 86,2 – 100 %). Schlussfolgerung: Die Kontrastmittelsonografie mit niedrigem mechanischem Index und der Anwendung von SonoVue stellt ein brauchbares Instrument für die Bewertung des Therapieerfolgs der Radiofrequenzablation beim hepatozellulären Karzinom dar mit einer Genauigkeit, die der des 4-zeiligen Spiral-CT vergleichbar ist.
Abstract
Purpose: The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with low mechanical index in evaluating the response of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by comparing it with 4-row spiral computed tomography. Materials and Methods: 100 consecutive patients (65 men and 35 women; age range: 62 – 76 years) with solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (mean lesion diameter: 3.7 cm ± 1.1 cm SD) underwent internally cooled radiofrequency ablation. Therapeutic response was evaluated at one month after the treatment with triple-phasic contrast-enhanced spiral CT and low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasound following bolus injection of 2.4 ml of Sonovue (Bracco, Milan). 60 out of 100 patients were followed up for another 3 months. Contrast-enhanced sonographic studies were reviewed by two blinded radiologists in consensus. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination were determined. Results: After treatment, contrast-enhanced ultrasound identified persistent signal enhancement in 24 patients (24 %), whereas no intratumoral enhancement was detected in the remaining 76 patients (76 %). Using CT imaging as gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of contrast enhanced ultrasound were 92.3 % (95 % CI = 75.9 – 97.9 %), 100 % (95 % CI = 95.2 – 100 %), 97.4 % (95 % CI = 91.1 – 99.3 %), and 100 % (95 % CI = 86.2 – 100 %). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with low mechanical index using Sonovue is a feasible tool in evaluating the response of hepatocellular carcinoma to radiofrequency ablation. Accuracy is comparable to 4-row spiral CT.
Key words
neoplasms - abdomen - CT - ultrasound - radiofrequency
References
- 1
Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet J M. et al .
Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma: conclusions of the Barcelona-2000
EASL Conference.
Journal of Hepatology.
2001;
35
421-430
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Inoue K.
No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic
patients. Is there a way? A prospective analysis of our approach.
Arch Surg.
1999;
134
984-992
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Livraghi T, Goldberg S N, Lazzaroni S. et al .
Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol
injection.
Radiology.
1999;
210
655-661
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Shibata T, Iimuro Y, Yamamoto Y. et al .
Small hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of radio-frequency ablation and percutaneous
microwave coagulation therapy.
Radiology.
2002;
223
331-337
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Heisterkamp J, Hillegersberg van R, Ijzermans J N.
Interstitial laser coagulation for hepatic tumours.
Br J Surg.
1999;
86
293-304
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Bilchik A J, Wood T F, Allegra D. et al .
Cryosurgical ablation and radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatic malignant
neoplasms: a proposed algorithm.
Arch Surg.
2000;
135
657-664
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Solbiati L, Goldberg S N, Ierace T. et al .
Hepatic metastases: percutaneous radio-frequency ablation with cooled-tip electrodes.
Radiology.
1997;
205
367-373
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M. et al .
Guidance and monitoring of radiofrequency liver tumor ablation with contrast-enhanced
ultrasound.
Eur Journal Radiol.
2004;
51
19-23
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Vilana R, Bianchi L, Varela M. et al .
Is microbuble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous
treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma?.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
2454-2462
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Goldberg S N, Gazelle G S, Compton C C. et al .
Treatment of intrahepatic malignancy with radiofrequency ablation: radiologic-pathologic
correlation.
Cancer.
2000;
88
2452-2463
MissingFormLabel
- 11 Bartolozzi C, Cioni D, Donati F. et al .Imaging evaluation of tumor response. Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R Liver malignancies. Diagnostic and interventional radiology Berlin; Springer-Verlag 1999 1st ed: 467-487
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Meloni F M, Goldberg S N, Livraghi T. et al .
Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency ablation : comparison of pulse
inversion contrast-enhanced harmonic sonography, contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography,
and helical CT.
AJR.
2001;
177
375-380
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Yamasaki S, Hasegawa S, Makuuchi M. et al .
Choice of treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma: hepatectomy, embolization
or ethanol injection.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
1991;
6
408-413
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Ryu M, Shimamura Y, Kawano N. et al .
The present condition of the treatment for HCC.
Gastroenterol Surg.
1995;
18
415-419
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Reinhold C, Hammers L, Taylor C R. et al .
Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with duplex sonography: finding in 198 patients.
Am J Roentgenol.
1995;
164
1131-1135
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Rubin J M, Bude R O, Carson P L. et al .
Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean-frequency-based color Doppler
US.
Radiology.
1994;
190
853-856
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Sumi S, Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K. et al .
Power Doppler sonography assessment of tumor recurrence after chemoembolization therapy
for hepatocellular carcinoma.
AJR.
1999;
172
67-71
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Hosten N, Puls R, Bechstein W O. et al .
Focal liver lesions: Doppler ultrasound.
Eur Radiology.
1999;
9
428-435
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Kim A Y, Choi B I, Kim T K. et al .
Hepatocellular carcinoma: power Doppler US with a contrast agent: preliminary results.
Radiology.
1998;
209
135-140
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Ricci P. et al .
Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with percutaneous ethanol injection: evaluation
with contrast-enhanced color-Doppler US.
Radiology.
1998;
209
387-393
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H. et al .
Evaluation of post-treatment response for hepatocellular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced
coded phase-inversion harmonic US: comparison with dynamic CT.
Radiology.
2001;
221
721-730
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Imai Y, Okamoto N, Tateiwa N. et al .
Assessment of treatment efficacy in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma:
comparison between multiplanar reconstruction by multi-detector CT an contrast-enhanced
ultrasonography by Truagent detection mode.
Hepatology research.
2006;
35
69-75
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Kisaka Y, Hirooka M, Uehara T. et al .
Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with abdominal virtual ultrasonography
in assessing therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with radiofrequency
ablation.
Liver International.
2006;
26
1241-1247
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Choi D, Lim H K, Lee W J. et al .
Radiofrequency ablation of liver cancer: early evaluation of therapeutic response
with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Korean J Radiol.
2004;
5
185-196
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Wen Y L, Kudo M, Zheng R Q. et al .
Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: therapeutic response using contrast-enhanced
coded phase inversion harmonic sonography.
AJR.
2003;
181
57-63
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Kim H J, Kim T K, Kim P N. et al .
Assessment of the therapeutic response of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter
arterial chemoembolization: comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and 3-phase
computed tomography.
J Ultrasound Med.
2006;
25
477-86
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Gazelle G S, Goldberg S N, Solbiati L. et al .
Tumor ablation with radiofrequency energy.
Radiology.
2000;
217
633-646
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Kubale R, Clevert D, Krämer W. et al .
Possibilities and limitations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU) in an outpatient
centre.
Ultraschall in Med.
DOI: 10. 1055 /s2007-989 005
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Herbay von A, Haeussinger D, Gregor M. et al .
Characterization and detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): comparison of the
ultrasound contrast agents SonoVue (BR 1) and Levovist (SH U 508A) Comparison of SonoVue
and Levovist in HCC Charakterisierung und Detektion des Hepatozellulären Karzinoms
(HCC): Vergleich der Ultraschallkontrastmittel SonoVue (BR 1) und Levovist (SH U 508A).
Ultraschall in Med.
2007;
28
168-175
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Stang A, Keles H, Seydewitz von D. et al .
Percutanous and Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic
Tumours Perkutane und intraoperative ultraschallgeführte Radiofrequenzablation hepatischer
Tumoren.
Ultraschall in Med.
2007;
28
181-188
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Ichikawa T, Erturk S M, Araki T.
Multiphasic contrast-enhanced multidetector-row Ct of liver: contrast-enhancement
theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration
and patients’ body-weight-tailored dose of contrast material.
Eur J Radiol.
2006;
58
165-176
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Colagrande S, La Villa G, Vartolucci M. et al .
Spiral computed tomography versus ultrasound in the follow-up of cirrhotic patients
previously treated for the hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study.
J hepatol.
2003;
39
93-98
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Lim H K, Choi D, Lee W J. et al .
Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: evaluation
with follow-up multiphase spiral CT.
Radiology.
2001;
221
447-454
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Sironi S, Livraghi T, Meloni F. et al .
Small hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous RF ablation: MR imaging follow-up.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
1225-1229
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Goldberg S N, Gazelle G S, Mueller P R.
Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles,
and diagnostic imaging guidance.
Am J Roentgenol.
2000;
174
323-331
MissingFormLabel
Ugo D’Ambrosio
Department of Radiology, University “La Sapienza”
Viale del Policlinico
00176 ROME
Italy
Telefon: ++ 39/3 38/8 74 48 67 n nn
Fax: ++ 39/06/60 50 72 44 n nn
eMail: compax@gmail.com