PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(04): 470-475
DOI: 10.1160/ME9051
 
Schattauer GmbH

Local, Regional and National Interoperability in Hospital-level Systems Architecture

J. Mykkänen
1   University of Kuopio, HIS R&D Unit, Kuopio, Finland
,
M. Korpela
1   University of Kuopio, HIS R&D Unit, Kuopio, Finland
,
S. Ripatti
2   Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Information Management, Helsinki, Finland
,
J. Rannanheimo
3   Kuopio University Hospital, Information Technology, Kuopio, Finland
,
J. Sorri
4   Medici Data Oy, Oulu, Finland
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
20. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: Interoperability of applications in health care is faced with various needs by patients, health professionals, organizations and policy makers. A combination of existing and new applications is a necessity. Hospitals are in a position to drive many integration solutions, but need approaches which combine local, regional and national requirements and initiatives with open standards to support flexible processes and applications on a local hospital level.

Methods: We discuss systems architecture of hospitals in relation to various processes and applications, and highlight current challenges and prospects using a service-oriented architecture approach. We also illustrate these aspects with examples from Finnish hospitals.

Results: A set of main services and elements of service-oriented architectures for health care facilities are identified, with medium-term focus which acknowledges existing systems as a core part of service-oriented solutions. The services and elements are grouped according to functional and interoperability cohesion.

Conclusions: Atransition towards service-oriented architecture in health care must acknowledge existing health information systems and promote the specification of central processes and software services locally and across organizations. Software industry best practices such as SOA must be combined with health care knowledge to respond to central challenges such as continuous change in health care. A service-oriented approach cannot entirely rely on common standards and frameworks but it must be locally adapted and complemented.

Keywords

Health information systems - interoperability - service-oriented architecture
 

  • References

  • 1 Haux R, Knaup P, Bauer A, Herzog W, Reinhardt E, Überla K, van Eimeren W, Wahlster W. Information Processing in Healthcare at the Start of the third Millenium: Potential and Limitations. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40: 156-162.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 CEN/ISSS. Current and future standardization issues in the e-Health domain: Achieving interoperability. Executive Summary, Final Version 2005-03-01, report from the CEN/ISSS e-Health Standardization Focus Group. CEN; 2005.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mikola T, Wanne O, Itälä T, Virtanen A. Implementing regional information system for social and health care in Finland, Satakunta. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002; 90: 723-728.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Papazoglou MP, van den Heuvel W-J. Service-Oriented Design and Development Methodology. Int J of Web Engineering and Technology (IJWET) 2006; 04: 412-442.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Perepletchikov M, Ryan C, Tari Z. The Impact of Software Development Strategies on Project and Structural Software Attributes in SOA. Proc. of the 2nd INTEROP NoE Dissemination Workshop. OTM Workshops; 2005: 442-451.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Arsanjani A. Service-oriented modeling and architecture. IBM Developer works; Nov 9 2004.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Beale T. Health information standards Manifesto. Revision 2.5 2001 http://www.deepthought.com.au/health/HIS_manifesto/Output/his_manifesto.html. Accessed Sep 30,2006.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 HSSP. Healthcare Services Specification Project. http://hssp.wikispaces.com/. Accessed Sep 30, 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV, Shabo A. HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 30-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lenz R, Beyer M, Kuhn K. Semantic integration in healthcare networks. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 385-390.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eichelberg M, Aden T, Riesmeier J, Dogac A, Laleci G. A survey and analysis of electronic healthcare record standards. ACM Computing Surveys 2005; 37 (04) 277-315.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Dickinson G, Fischetti L, Heard S. HL7 EHR System Functional Model – Draft Standard for Trial Use. Health Level Seven, Inc.; July 2004.
  • 13 Vegoda P. Introducing the IHE (Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise) concept. JHIM 2002; 16: 22-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Špidlen J, Hanzlíček P, Řiha A, Zvárová J. Flexible information storage in MUDRII EHR. Int J Med Inf 2006; 75: 201-208.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tsiknakis M, Katehakis D, Orphanoudakis S. An open, component-based information infrastructure for integrated health information systems. Int JMed Inf 2002; 68: 3-26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Turner M, Zhu F, Kotsiopoulos I, Russel M, Budgen D, Bennet K, Brereton P, Keane J, Layzell P, Rigby M. Using web service technologies to create an information broker: an experience report. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ‘04). IEEE; 2004: 552-561.
    Google Scholar