Thromb Haemost 2006; 96(06): 700-710
DOI: 10.1160/TH06-06-0319
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Prevention of distal embolization in patients undergoing mechanical revascularization for acute myocardial infarction

A review of current status
Giuseppe De Luca
1   Division of Cardiology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
,
Harry Suryapranata
2   Isala Klinieken, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, The Netherlands
,
Massimo Chiariello
1   Division of Cardiology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 12 June 2006

Accepted after resubmission 13 October 2006

Publication Date:
29 November 2017 (online)

Zoom Image

Summary

Distal embolization is a relatively common complication in primary angioplasty and is associated with poor perfusion and higher mortality. The aim of this article is to critically review literature on pharmacological and mechanical therapies to prevent distal embolization in patients undergoing primary angioplasty. The literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Pubmed) from January 1990 to March 2006 and scientific session abstracts (from January 1990 to March 2006) and oral presentation and/or expert slide presentations (from January 2002 to March 2006) (on TCT, AHA, ESC, ACC and EuroPCR websites). No language restrictions were enforced. Several pharmacological and mechanical therapies have been investigated to prevent distal embolization.Abciximab has been shown to reduce mortality,and its early admin-istration may provide additional benefits in outcome due to improvement in preprocedural reperfusion.The results of randomized trials on adjunctive mechanical devices remain controversial. Even though they reduce distal embolization and improve myocardial perfusion, no benefits have been observed in terms of 30-day survival. Adjunctive abciximab has improved survival, and its early administration is to be recommended, particularly when transportation to a primary PCI center is needed. Pending the results of large randomized trials with long-term follow-up data, the routine use of adjunctive mechanical devices to prevent distal embolization cannot be recommended, though selective use of these devices might be considered when large thrombotic burden is present.