Will a once-weekly anticoagulant for the treatment and secondary prevention of thromboembolism improve adherence?

Summary

Oral anticoagulation, most commonly with warfarin once daily, has long been the main form of long-term treatment and secondary prevention of thromboembolism. The efficacy of warfarin has been established in clinical trials, but problems with unstable anticoagulation with international normalized ratios (INRs) outside the recommended range due to incorrect dosing, drug and food interactions, and with adherence and persistence have been reported in practice. Poor adherence and persistence are serious problems because they result in out-of-range INRs. Many new thromboembolic events, such as strokes, occur when INRs are out-of-range or after warfarin discontinuation. Among the new anticoagulants currently being investigated, some offer the possibility of more stable anticoagulation and weekly administration. Less frequent dosing schedules generally improve adherence. In many cases, such as bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis, and the long-term treatment of depressive disorders or multiple sclerosis, adherence to, and persistence with, weekly dosing is improved compared with daily dosing, and most patients prefer weekly dosing. The advent of novel anticoagulants such as idraparinux with its long half-life offers hope for improved adherence with anticoagulation, and ultimately improved outcomes.

Keywords

Idraparinux - anticoagulant - thromboembolism - dose frequency - adherence

• References

• 1 Ansell J. et al. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (Suppl. 03) 204S-233S.
• 2 Jones M. et al. Evaluation of the pattern of treatment, level of anticoagulation control, and outcome of treatment with warfarin in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation: a record linkage study in a large British population. Heart 2005; 91: 472-477.
• 3 De Schryver EL. et al Dutch TIA trial and SPIRIT study groups.. Non-adherence to aspirin or oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 2005; 252: 1316-1321.
• 4 Budnitz DS. et al. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. J Am Med Assoc 2006; 296: 1858-1866.
• 5 U.S. Food and Drug Administration.. 2006 Safety alerts for drugs, biologics, medical devices, and dietary supplements. October 6, 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2006/safety06.htm#Coumadin. Accessed February 12, 2008.
• 6 Wahl C. et al. Concordance, compliance and adherence in healthcare: closing gaps and improving outcomes. Healthc Q 2005; 8: 65-70.
• 7 Jackevicius CA. et al. Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 462-467.
• 8 Dunbar-Jacob J. et al. Adherence in chronic disease. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2000; 18: 48-90.
• 9 Arnsten JH. et al. Determinants of compliance with anticoagulation: A case-control study. Am J Med 1997; 103: 11-17.
• 10 Ingelgård A. et al. What are the barriers to warfarin use in atrial fibrillation?: Development of a questionnaire. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006; 21: 257-265.
• 11 Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 487-497.
• 12 Palareti G. et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet 1996; 348: 423-428.
• 13 de Vicente Cámara MP. et al. Major thromboembolic complications during oral anticoagulant therapy. Importance of level of anticoagulation. Sangre (Barc) 1999; 44: 469-472.
• 14 Wittkowsky AK, Devine EB. Frequency and causes of overanticoagulation and underanticoagulation in patients treated with warfarin. Pharmacotherapy 2004; 24: 1311-1316.
• 15 Geerts WH. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (Suppl. 03) 338S-400S.
• 16 Thom T. et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee.. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006; 113: e85-151.
• 17 Mackay J, Mensah GA. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. World Health Organization; 2004. Available at: http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/ Accessed February 12, 2008.
• 18 Hansson PO. et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism after deep vein thrombosis: incidence and risk factors. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 769-774.
• 19 Kumar S. et al. Effect of warfarin on plasma concentrations of vitamin K dependent coagulation factors in patients with stable control and monitored compliance. Br J Haematol 1990; 74: 82-85.
• 20 Van Gelder IC. et al Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group.. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1834-1840.
• 21 Wyse DG. et al. Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators.. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1825-1833.
• 22 Waterman AD. et al. Effect of warfarin nonadherence on control of the International Normalized Ratio. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004; 61: 1258-1264.
• 23 Brigden ML. et al. Audit of the frequency and clinical response to excessive oral anticoagulation in an outpatient population. Am J Hematol 1998; 59: 22-27.
• 24 Kumar S. et al. Poor compliance is a major factor in unstable outpatient control of anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 1989; 62: 729-732.
• 25 Hixson-Wallace JA. et al. Effect of regimen complexity on patient satisfaction and compliance with warfarin therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2001; 7: 33-37.
• 26 Parker CS. et al. Adherence to warfarin assessed by electronic pill caps, clinician assessment, and patient reports: results from the IN-RANGE study. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1254-1259.
• 27 Nichol MB. et al. Quality of anticoagulation monitoring in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: comparison of anticoagulation clinic versus usual care. Ann Pharmacother 2008; 42: 62-70.
• 28 Holbrook AM. et al. Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1095-1106.
• 29 Fischer RG. Compliance-oriented prescribing: simplifying drug regimens. J Fam Pract 1980; 10: 427-435.
• 30 Bloom BS. Daily regimen and compliance with treatment. Br Med J 2001; 323: 647.
• 31 Cramer JA. et al. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. J Am Med Assoc 1989; 261: 3273-3277.
• 32 Greenberg RN. Overview of patient compliance with medication dosing: a literature review. Clin Ther 1984; 6: 592-599.
• 33 Claxton AJ. et al. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1296-1310.
• 34 Richter A. et al. The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2307-2335.
• 35 Pettinger MB. et al. Compliance to multiple interventions in a high risk population. Ann Epidemiol 1999; 9: 408-418.
• 36 Orensky IA, Holdford DA. Predictors of noncompliance with warfarin therapy in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25: 1801-1808.
• 37 Wells PS. et al. Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1809-1812.
• 38 Cramer JA. et al. Compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate dosing regimens among women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 1453-1460.
• 39 Van Staa TP. et al. Persistence to bisphosphonate treatment in actual clinical practice. Bone 2005; 36: 610.
• 40 Recker RR. et al. Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 856-861.
• 41 Weiss M. et al. Treatment preference and tolerability with alendronate once weekly over a 3-month period: an Israeli multi-center study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2005; 17: 143-149.
• 42 Claxton A. et al. Patient compliance to a new enteric-coated weekly formulation of fluoxetine during continuation treatment of major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 928-932.
• 43 Devonshire V. et al. on behalf of the GAP Study Group.. The Global Adherence Project—A multicentre observational study on adherence to disease-modifying therapies in patients suffering from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Presentation at the 22nd Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis, September 27–30, 2006; Madrid, Spain.
• 44 Jahng KH. et al. Preferences for medical collaboration: patient-physician congruence and patient outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 308-314.
• 45 Gage BF. et al. Cost-effectiveness of preference-based antithrombotic therapy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke 1998; 29: 1083-1091.
• 46 Herbert JM. et al. Biochemical and pharmacological properties of SANORG 34006, a potent and long-acting synthetic pentasaccharide. Blood 1998; 91: 4197-4205.
• 47 PERSIST investigators. A novel long-acting synthetic factor Xa inhibitor (SanOrg34006) to replace warfarin for secondary prevention in deep vein thrombosis. A Phase II evaluation. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 47-53.
• 48 van Gogh Investigators. et al. Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1094-1104.
• 49 van Gogh Investigators. et al. Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with idraparinux. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1105-1112.