Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1160/TH15-02-0149
Onset of optimal P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade after ticagrelor and prasugrel intake in Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Financial support: The present work was supported by the Assistance Publique – Hopitaux de Marseille.Publication History
Received:
17 February 2015
Accepted after major revision:
17 May 2015
Publication Date:
29 November 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035024/201504/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1160-th15-02-0149-1.jpg)
Summary
Pretreatment with a loading dose (LD) of clopidogrel or ticagrelor before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is supported by the guidelines, but debated following a recent meta-analysis on clopidogrel pretreatment and the ACCOAST trial. In this trial prasugrel pretreatment failed to reduce ischaemic events. The timing of optimal platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition of ticagrelor and prasugrel in non ST-elevation ACS (NSTE ACS) is yet undetermined. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the delay required to reach optimal PR inhibition in NSTE ACS following a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI for NSTE ACS were randomised in this monocentre study. The Vasodilatorphosphoprotein index (VASP) was used to measure PR before the LD and then at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4 and 24 hours (h) post-LD. Optimal PR inhibition was defined as a VASP< 50 %. We randomised 24 patients to ticagrelor or prasugrel LD. One hour after the LD, 29 % of patients had a VASP > 50 % (ticagrelor and prasugrel: 25 vs 33 %; p=0.7). Optimal PR inhibition was obtained 2 h after the LD in both groups (12/12 with ticagrelor and 11/12 with prasugrel). At that time, the mean VASP index was 19 ± 16 % (95 %CI: 12–25). Maximal PR inhibition was reached after 4 h: 11 ± 10 % (95 %CI: 6–15). In NSTE ACS undergoing PCI a LD of ticagrelor or prasugrel given during the procedure provides optimal P2Y12-ADP receptor blockade in 2 h and maximal inhibition within 4 h.
-
References
- 1 Schömig A, Neumann FJ, Kastrati A. et al. A randomized comparison of anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary-artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1084-109.
- 2 Mehta SR, Yusuf S. Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) Study Investigators. The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial programme; rationale, design and baseline characteristics including a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in vascular disease. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 2033-2041.
- 3 Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D. et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2005; 111: 2560-2564.
- 4 Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D. et al. Working Group on On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity.. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate associated with ischaemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 2261-2273.
- 5 Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann 3rd JT. et al. CREDO Investigators. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 2411-2420.
- 6 Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F. et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541-2619.
- 7 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
- 8 Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
- 9 Bellemain-Appaix A, O’Connor SA, Silvain J. et al. ACTION Group.. Association of clopidogrel pretreatment with mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2012; 308: 2507-2516.
- 10 Montalescot G, Bolognese L, Dudek D. et al. ACCOAST Investigators. Pre-treatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 999-1010.
- 11 ATLANTIC Investigators.. Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1016-1027.
- 12 Parodi G, Valenti R, Bellandi B. et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1601-1606.
- 13 Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Gkizas V. et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 797-804.
- 14 Barragan P, Paganelli F, Camoin-Jau L. et al. Validation of a novel ELISA-based VASP whole blood assay to measure P2Y12-ADP receptor activity. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 410-411.
- 15 Abtan J, Silvain J, Kerneis M. et al. Identification of poor response to P2Y12 inhibitors in ACS patients with a new ELISA-based vasodilator-associated stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation assay. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 1055-1064.
- 16 PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44 Investigators.. Prasugrel compared with high loading- and maintenance-dose clopidogrel in patients with planned percutaneous coronary intervention: the Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 trial. Circulation 2007; 116: 2923-2932.
- 17 Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Butler K. et al. Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study. Circulation 2009; 120: 2577-2585.
- 18 Bonello L, Berbis J, Laine M. et al. Biological efficacy of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 101-106.
- 19 Frelinger 3rd AL, Michelson AD, Wiviott SD. et al. Intrinsic platelet reactivity before P2Y12 blockade contributes to residual platelet reactivity despite high-level P2Y12 blockade by prasugrel or high-dose clopidogrel. Results from PRINCIPLE-TIMI 44. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 219-226.
- 20 Alexopoulos D. P2Y12 inhibitors adjunctive to primary PCI therapy in STEMI: fighting against the activated platelets. Int J Cardiol 2013; 163: 249-255.
- 21 Lakkis N, Dokainish H, Abuzahra M. et al. Reticulated platelets in acute coronary syndrome: a marker of platelet activity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 4: 2091-2093.
- 22 Parodi G, Bellandi B, Xanthopoulou I. et al. Morphine Is Associated With a Delayed Activity of Oral Antiplatelet Agents in Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Epub ahead of print.
- 23 Lemesle G, Schurtz G, Bauters C. et al. High on-treatment platelet reactivity with Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Epub ahead of print.