Quantitative Score for the Evaluation of Kinematic Recordings in Neuropediatric Diagnostics

Summary

Objective: Evaluation of spontaneous infant movements is an important tool for the detection of neurological impairments. One important aspect of this evaluation is the observation of movements which exhibit certain complex properties. This article presents a method to automatically extract segments which contain such complex patterns in order to quantitatively assess them.

Methods: Expert knowledge is represented in a principal component model which captures the term complexity as the multivariate interactions in the kinematic chains of the upper and the lower limb. A complexity score is introduced which is used to quantify the similarity of new movements to this model. It was applied to the recordings of 53 infants which were diagnosed by physicians as normal or pathologic.

Results: Time segments marked as complex (from five infants) by physicians could be detected with a mean accuracy of 0.77 by the automated approach. The median of the best complexityscoresofthepathologicgroup(n = 21) is significantly lower (p = 0.001) than the median of the normal group (n = 27).

Conclusion: Using the complexity score we were able to quantify movement complexity in regard of the understanding of physicians. This could be useful for clinical applications.

Keywords

Principal component analysis - quantitative movement analysis - infant movements - pediatric neurology

• References

• 1 Prechtl HF. et al. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. The Lancet 1997; 349: 1361-1363.
• 2 Prechtl HF. Qualitative changes of spontaneous movements in fetus and preterm infant are a marker of neurological dysfunction. Early Human Development 1990; 23 (03) 151-158.
• 3 Hadders-Algra M. Evaluation of Motor Function in Young Infants by Means of the Assessment of General Movements: A Review. Pediatric Physical Therapy 2001; 13: 27-36.
• 4 Karch D. et al. Quantification of the segmental kinematics of spontaneous infant movements. Journal of Biomechanics 2008; 41 (13) 2860-2867.
• 5 Kaiser H. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 141-151.
• 6 Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP, Zee B, Costigan PA, Serbie C. Principal component models of knee kinematics and kinetics: Normal vs pathological gait patterns. Human Movement Science 1997; 16 2–3 201-217.
• 7 Fetters L, Chen Y, Jonsdottir J, Tronick EZ. Kicking coordination captures differences between full-term and premature infants with white matter disorder. Human Movement Science 2004; 22 (06) 729-748.
• 8 Ohgi S, Morita S, Khee Loo K, Mizuike C. Time Series Analysis of Spontaneous Upper-Extremity Movements of Premature Infants with Brain Injuries. Physical Therapy 2008; 88 (09) 1022-1033.