“Why the Hell Do We Need Electronic Health Records?”

Summary

Background: Progress in the medical sciences, together with related technologies, in the past has led to higher specialization and has created a strong need to exchange health information across institutional borders. The concept of electronic health records (EHR) was introduced to fulfill these needs. Remarkably, many EHR introduction projects ran into trouble, not least because they lacked the acceptance of EHR among physicians. Negative emotions, such as anxiety and fear due to a lack of information, may cause change barriers and hamper physicians’ acceptance of such projects.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to gain deeper insight into the negative emotions related to the intended implementation of a mandatory national electronic health record system (called ELGA) in Austria among physicians in private practice.

Methods: Qualitative, problem-centered interviews were conducted with eight physicians in private practice in the capital region of Tyrol. The methods of qualitative content analysis were used to analyze the data.

Results: Three hundred and twenty-eight pas sages in the interviews were selected, annotated, and paraphrased. These passages were assigned to 139 different primary categories. Finally, 18 main categories in the form of statements were derived. They were correlated and a theoretical model was formed to explain the genesis of the detected fears and anxiety related to the ELGA project. The results show that the physicians feel uninformed and snubbed. They fear unknown changes, increased costs, as well as workload and surveillance without obtaining any advantages from using electronic health records in their daily practice.

Conclusion: Impartial information campaigns that are tailored to the physicians’ needs and questions as along with a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis could benefit the physicians’ opinion of EHRs.

Keywords

Electronic health record (EHR) - organizational innovation - risk management - attitude - qualitative research

• References

• 1 Kurzweil R. The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. New York: Viking; 2005
• 2 U. S. National Library of Medicine.. Detailed Indexing Statistics: 1965-2008 – Number of Citations in Medline. Rockville Pike 2010 (updated 15.06.2009; cited 2010 15.02.2010). Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/index_stats_comp.html
• 3 Berner ES, Moss J. Informatics challenges for the impending patient information explosion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (06) 614-617.
• 4 Winter A, Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Hell-rung N, Jahn F. Health Information Systems – Architectures and Strategies. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2010
• 5 Bisbal J, Berry D. An Analysis Framework for Electronic Health Record Systems. Methods Inf Med (in print). Prepublished 20.11. 2009.doi: 10.3414/ME09-01-0002
• 6 Waegemann P. Status Report 2002: Electronic Health Records. Boston: Medical Records Institute; 2002. (cited 2010 12.02.2010). Available from: www.mriint.com/uploadedFiles/MRILibrary/StatusReport.pdf
• 7 ISO – TC 215.. ISO/TR 20514 Health informatics – Electronic health record – Definition, scope, and context. Geneva: 2005
• 8 Sozialversicherungs-Chipkarten Betriebs- und Errichtungsgesellschaft.. The Austrian e-card System. (Webpage). Vienna 2010 (cited 2010 01.02.2010). Available from: http://www.chipkarte.at/portal27/portal/ecardportal/channel_content/cmsWindow?p_tabid=5&p_menuid=52069&action=2
• 9 Gesundheitsreformgesetz 2005, 693 d. B. (XXII. GP); 2005
• 10 IBM.. Machbarkeitsstudie betreffend Einführung der elektronischen Gesundheitsakte (ELGA) im österreichischen Gesundheitswesen (Feasability study for implementing the electronic health record (ELGA) in the Austrian health system) (Report. Wien:: ARGE ELGA; 2006. (cited 2010 10.02.2010). Available from: http://www.arge-elga.at/fileadmin/user_upload/uploads/download_Papers/Arge_Papers/Machbarkeitsstudie_ELGA_Endbericht_ 21112006.pdf , English summary at http://www.arge-elga.at/fileadmin/user_upload/uploads/download_Papers/Arge_Papers/Endbericht_Folgeauftrag_en.pdf
• 11 IBM Österreich Gmb H. Ergebnisbericht ELGA Systemkomponenten und Masterplan (Report). Wien:: ARGE ELGA; 2007 (cited 2010 10.02.2010). Available from: http://www.arge-elga.at/fileadmin/user_upload/uploads/download_Papers/Arge_Papers/Endbericht_Folgeauftrag.pdf
• 12 Medical Tribune.. Verwaltung der e-Gesundheitsdaten: Ärzte sollen Daten verwalten Medical Tribune (serial on the Internet). 2006: 47. Available from: http://www.medical-tribune.at/dynasite.cfm?dsmid=58936
• 13 Medical Tribune.. Wechsel im Gesundheitsministerium. Kaum im Amt, schon attackiert. Medical Tribune (serial on the Internet) 2007; (4). Available from: http://www.medical-tribune.at/dynasite.cfm?dssid=4170&dsmid=77523&dspaid=603767
• 14 Kraßnitzer M. E-Health: Private Systeme statt teurer ELGA?. ärztemagazin (serial on the Internet) 2007; (19). Available from: http://www.medical-tribune.at/dynasite.cfm?dssid=4169&dsmid=80467&dspaid=626659
• 15 Hofmarcher M. Electronic Health Record: developments and debates. Health Policy Monitor (serial on the Internet) 2008 (cited 2010 06.02.2010). Available from: http://www.hpm.org/en/SurveysIHS_-_Austria/12/Electronic_Health_Record__developments_and_debates.html
• 16 Zimbardo PG. Psychologie. 5th ed. Hoppe-Graff SAK, Barbara, editor. Heidelberg: Springer; 1992
• 17 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing change: an overview. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (02) 116-124.
• 18 Williams LS. Microchips versus stethoscopes: Calgary hospital, MDs face off over controversial computer system. CMAJ 1992; 147 (10) 1534-1540 43-44, 47.
• 19 Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (02) 125-137.
• 20 Ärztekammer für Wien.. E-Health: Weniger Staat – Mehr Privat. (Press release). Wien: Ärztekammer Wien; 2007 (cited 2008 01.06). Pressekonferenz. Available from: http://www.aekwien.at/conf_p.py?Page=1&id_press=648&id_press_type=2
• 21 Hoerbst A, Kohl CD, Knaup P, Ammenwerth E. Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79 (02) 81-89.
• 22 Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publ; 2008
• 23 Witzel A. The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (serial on the Internet) 2000; (1 (1)). Available from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn : nbn:de:0114-fqs0001228
• 24 Bortz J, Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006
• 25 Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research (serial on the Internet) 2000; 1 (2). Available from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn : de:0114-fqs0002204
• 26 ATLAS. ti Gmb H. Atlas.ti – the knowledge workbench. 5.2 ed: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH; 2008
• 27 Lewin K. Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, Method and Reality in Social Science, Social Equilibria and Social Change. Human Relations 1947; 1 (01) 5-41.
• 28 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT, Blyth AJ, Southon G, Dixon BJ. Antecedents of the people and organizational aspects of medical informatics: review of the literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4 (02) 79-93.
• 29 EFMI Workgroup Assessment of Health Information Systems.. Bad Health Informatics Can Kill. Hall in Tirol 2010(cited 2010 01.03.2010). Available from: http://iig.umit.at/efmi/badinformatics.htm
• 30 Simon SR, Kaushal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Poon EG. et al. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (01) 110-117.
• 31 Stream GR. Trends in adoption of electronic health records by family physicians in Washington State. Inform Prim Care 2009; 17 (03) 145-152.
• 32 Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (02) 121-126.
• 33 Lorenzi NM, Kouroubali A, Detmer DE, Bloom-rosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009; 9: 15.
• 34 Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12 (05) 505-516.
• 35 Leonard KJ. Critical Success Factors Relating to Healthcare’s Adoption of New Technology: A Guide to Increasing the Likelihood of Successful Implementation. ElectronicHealthcare 2004; 2 (04) 72-81.