PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(06): 508-524
DOI: 10.3414/ME11-06-0003
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Biomedical Informatics – A Confluence of Disciplines?

A. Hasman
1   Department of Medical Informatics, AMC-University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
E. Ammenwerth
2   UMIT – University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol. Austria
,
H. Dickhaus
3   Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
P. Knaup
3   Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
,
C. Lovis
4   Division of Medical information sciences, University hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
J. Mantas
5   Health Informatics Laboratory, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
,
V. Maojo
6   Biomedical Informatics Group, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain
,
F. J. Martin-Sanchez
7   Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia
,
M. Musen
8   Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
,
V. L. Patel
9   Center for Cognitive Studies in Medicine and Public Health, New York Academy of Medicine, New York, USA
,
G. Surjan
10   National Institute for Strategic Health Research, Budapest, Hungary
,
J. L. Talmon
11   Center for Research, Innovation, Support and Policy, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
I. N. Sarkar
12   Center for Clinical and Translational Science; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Background: Biomedical informatics is a broad discipline that borrows many methods and techniques from other disciplines.

Objective: To reflect a) on the character of biomedical informatics and to determine whether it is multi-disciplinary or inter-disciplinary; b) on the question whether biomedical informatics is more than the sum of its supporting disciplines and c) on the position of biomedical informatics with respect to related disciplines.

Method: Inviting an international group of experts in biomedical informatics and related disciplines on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Methods of Information in Medicine to present their viewpoints.

Results and Conclusions: This paper contains the reflections of a number of the invited experts on the character of biomedical informatics. Most of the authors agree that biomedical informatics is an interdisciplinary field of study where researchers with different scientific backgrounds alone or in combination carry out research. Biomedical informatics is a very broad scientific field and still expanding, yet comprised of a constructive aspect (designing and building systems). One author expressed that the essence of biomedical informatics, as opposed to related disciplines, lies in the modelling of the biomedical content. Interdisciplinarity also has consequences for education. Maintaining rigid disciplinary structures does not allow for sufficient adaptability to capitalize on important trends nor to leverage the influences these trends may have on biomedical informatics. It is therefore important for students to become aware of research findings in related disciplines. In this respect, it was also noted that the fact that many scientific fields use different languages and that the research findings are stored in separate bibliographic databases makes it possible that potentially connected findings will never be linked, despite the fact that these findings were published. Bridges between the sciences are needed for the success of biomedical informatics.

Keywords

Biomedical informatics - bioinformatics - health informatics - multidisciplinarity - interdisciplinarity - education
 

  • References

  • 1 Chen H, Fuller S, Friedman C, Hersh W. (eds). Knowledge management and data mining in biomedicine. Springer; 2005
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Coiera E. Guide to health information. 2nd ed. London: Arnold; 2003
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 von Bertalanffy L. General System Theory : foundations, development, applications. London: The Pinguin Press; 1971
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fitzsimmons WE. Multiple drug interactions. Hospital Therapy 1989; 14 (Suppl. 02) 51-60.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Barabási AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12 (Suppl. 01) 56-68.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Barabási AL. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What it Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. New York, London: Pinguin Group; 2002
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Schrödinger E. What is life?. McMillan; 1946. Available at Cambridge University Press, 1992, ISBN 978-0521427081.
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Arndt M, Juffmann T, Vedral V. Quantum physics meets biology. HFSP J 2009; 3 (Suppl. 06) 386-400.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Collini E, Wong CY, Wilk KE, Curmi PM, Brumer P, Scholes GD. Coherently wired light-harvesting in photosynthetic marine algae at ambient temperature. Nature 2010; 463 7281 644-647.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Nagel ZD, Klinman JP. A 21st century revisionist’s view at a turning point in enzymology. Nat Chem Biol 2009; 5 (Suppl. 08) 543-550.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Meyer MP, Klinman JP. Investigating Inner-Sphere Reorganization via Secondary Kinetic Isotope Effects in the C-H Cleavage Reaction Catalyzed by Soybean Lipoxygenase: Tunneling in the Substrate Backbone as Well as the Transferred Hydrogen. J Am Chem Soc 2010 (Epub ahead of print.)
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 2002; 287 (Suppl. 21) 2847-2850.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Wang H, Ding Y, Tang J, Dong X, He B, Qiu J, Wild DJ. Finding Complex Biological Relationships in Recent PubMed Articles Using Bio-LDA. PLoS One 2011; 6 (Suppl. 03) e17243.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bernstam EV, Smith JW, Johnson TR. What is biomedical informatics?. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43: 104-110.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Haux R. Medical informatics: Past, present, and future. Int J Med Inform 2010; 21: 599-610.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mantas E, Ammenwerth E, Demeris A. et al. Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics. First Revision. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49: 105-120.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 http://www.amia.org/biomedical-informatics-core-competencies (accessed August 2, 2011)
    PubMed
  • 18 Musen MA. Medical informatics: Searching for underlying components. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 12-19.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rubin DL, Shah NH, Noy NF. Biomedical ontologies: a functional perspective. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2007; 9 (Suppl. 01) 75-90.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Shah NH, Musen MA. Ontologies for formal representation of biological systems. In: Studer S, Staab S. (eds). Handbook on Ontologies. New York: Springer-Verlag: 2009. pp 445-462
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Chandrasekaran B, Johnson TR, Smith JW. Task structure analysis for knowledge modeling. Communications of the ACM 1992; 33 (Suppl. 09) 124-136.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 O’Connor MJ, Nyulas C, Tu SW, Buckeridge DL, Okhmatovskaia A, Musen MA. Software-engineering challenges of building and deploying reusable problem solvers. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing 2009; 23: 339-356.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Mellor SJ. MDA Distilled: Principles of Model-Driven Architecture. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2004
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Crubézy M, Motta E, Lu W, Musen MA. Configuring online problem-solving resources with the Internet Reasoning Service. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2003; 2 (Suppl. 02) 34-42.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Martin-Sanchez et al. (2008) A primer in knowl edge management for Nanoinformatics in Medicine”. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems KES2008. IOS-Press; 2008
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Altman RB, Balling R, Brinkley JF, Coiera E, Consorti F, Dhansay MA, Geissbuhler A, Hersh W, Kwankam SY, Lorenzi NM, Martin-Sanchez F, Mihalas GI, Shahar Y, Takabayashi K, Wiederhold G. Commentaries on Informatics and medicine: from molecules to populations. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (Suppl. 04) 296-317.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Seipel M. Interdisciplinarity: An Introduction. Kirksville, Missouri: Truman State University; 2009
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rafols I, Porter AL, Leydesdorff L. Science overlay maps: a new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 2010; 61 (Suppl. 09) 1871-1887.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Harris J. The Case for Cross-Disciplinary Approaches in International Development. World Development 2002; 30.3: 487-496.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Henry S. Disciplinary hegemony meets interdisciplinary ascendancy: Can interdisciplinary/integrative studies survive, and if so how?. Issues in Integrative Studies 2005; 23: 1-37.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Shannon CE, Weaver W. Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press; 1963
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Blois M. Information and Medicine: The Nature of Medical Descriptions. Berkeley CA: Univ of California Press; 1984
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Maojo V, Kulikowski C. Medical informatics and bioinformatics: integration or evolution through scientific crises?. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 05) 474-482.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kulikowski CA. The micro-macro spectrum of medical informatics challenges: from molecular medicine to transforming health care in a globalizing society. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (Suppl. 01) 20-24.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Kohane IS. Bioinformatics and clinical informatics: the imperative to collaborate. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; 7 (Suppl. 05) 512-516.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Martin-Sanchez F, Iakovidis I, Nørager S, Maojo V, de Groen P, Van der Lei J, Jones T, Abraham-Fuchs K, Apweiler R, Babic A, Baud R, Breton V, Cinquin P, Doupi P, Dugas M, Eils R, Engelbrecht R, Ghazal P, Jehenson P, Kulikowski C, Lampe K, De Moor G, Orphanoudakis S, Rossing N, Sarachan B, Sousa A, Spekowius G, Thireos G, Zahlmann G, Zvárová J, Hermosilla I, Vicente FJ. Synergy between medical informatics and bioinformatics: facilitating genomic medicine for future health care. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37 (Suppl. 01) 30-42.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Maojo V, Kulikowski CA. Bioinformatics and medical informatics: collaborations on the road to genomic medicine?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (Suppl. 06) 515-522.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kim BY, Rutka JT, Chan WC. Nanomedicine. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (Suppl. 25) 2434-2443.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Jain K. The handbook of Nanomedicine. NJ: Humana Press; 2008. pp 161-192.
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F, Kulikowski C. et al. Nanoinformatics and DNA-based computing: catalyzing nanomedicine. Pediatr Res 2010; 67 (Suppl. 05) 481-489.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 National Science Foundation.. Nanoinformatics 2010: A Collaborative Roadmaping Workshop. November 3-5, 2010. Arlington, Virginia (USA): Available from http://nanotechinformatics.org Last access: February 2011
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Maojo V, García Remesal M, de la Iglesia D, Crespo J, Pérez-Rey D, Chiesa S, Fritts M, Kulikowski CA. Nanoinformatics: developing advanced informatics applications for nanomedicine. In: Prokov A, (ed). Intracellular Delivery: Fundamentals and Applications (Fundamental Biomedical Technologies). NY: Springer; 2011
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Maojo V, De la Iglesia D, García-Remesal M, Martín-Sánchez F. et al. Nanoinformatics in Europe: The ACTION-Grid White Paper. Proceedings of Nanoinformatics 2010. Arlington (Virginia, EEUU).: November 3-5 2010
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Maojo V, Martín-Sánchez F. et al. The ACTION-Grid White Paper: Linking Biomedical Informatics, Grid Computing and Nanomedicine (2010). Available from: http://www.action-grid.eu/index.php?url=whitepaper Last access: June 2011
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 De la Iglesia D, Maojo V, Chiesa S. et al. International efforts in nanoinformatics research applied to nanomedicine. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 01) 84-95.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Kay L. Who Wrote the Book of Life: A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford Univ Press; 2000
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Friedman CP. A “fundamental theorem” of biomedical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (Suppl. 02) 169-170.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C. et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25 (Suppl. 11) 1251-1255.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Smith B, Ceusters W. Ontological realism: A methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Appl Ontol 2010; 5 3–4 139-188.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Maojo V, Crespo J, García-Remesal M. et al. Biomedical Ontologies: Toward Scientific Debate. Methods Inf Med 2011 50. 03
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Brochhausen M, Burgun A, Ceusters W, Hasman A, Leong TY, Musen M, Oliveira JL, Peleg M, Rector A, Schulz S. Discussion of “biomedical ontologies: toward scientific debate”. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 03) 217-236.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH. Biomedical informatics: an emerging academic discipline and institutional priority. JAMA 1990; 263: 1114-1120.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Hasman A, Safran C. A new name, a new scope. Int J Med Inform 1997 44. 01
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Ledley RS, Lusted LB. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science 1959; 130: 9-21.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Patel VL, Kaufman DR. Biomedical informatics and the Science of Cognition. J Am Biomed Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 493-502.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Patel VL, Kaufman DR. Science and Practice: A Case for Biomedical informatics as a Local Science of Design. J Am Biomed Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 489-492.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. In: Clark HH. (ed). Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp 127-149.
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Horsky J, Kuperman GJ, Patel VL. Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE: A case report. JAMIA 2005; 12: 377-382.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J Am Biomed Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (Suppl. 01) 82-90.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Cimino JJ, Clayton PD, Hripcsak G, Johnson SB. Knowledge-based approaches to the maintenance of a large controlled medical terminology. JAMIA 1994; 1 (Suppl. 01) 35-50.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Carroll JM. Human–computer interaction: psychology as a science of design. Annu Rev Psychol 1997; 48: 61-83.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Patel VL, Yoskowitz NA, Arocha JF, Shortliffe EH. Cognitive and Learning Sciences in Biomedical and Health Instructional Design: A Review with Lessons for Biobiomedical informatics Education. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (Suppl. 01) 176-197.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 van Bemmel JH. Medical informatics, art or science?. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35 (Suppl. 03) 157-172. discussion 73-201.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RS, Watson RS, Nguyen TC. et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005; 116 (Suppl. 06) 1506-1512.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Ammenwerth E, Shaw N. Bad health informatics can kill – is evaluation the answer?. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 1-3.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykänen P, Prokosch H-U, Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems – reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 (Suppl. 06) 479-491.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 EC.. Council Directive 93/42/EEC and 2007/47/EC concerning medical devices. http://eur-lex.europa eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG: 1993L0042:20071011:en:PDF. 2007
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 68 Friedman CF, Haug P. Report on conference track 5: evaluation metrics and outcome. Int J Med Inform 2003; 69 2–3 307-309.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 69 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. A viewpoint on evidence-based health informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (Suppl. 03) 368-371.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 70 Rigby M, Ammenwerth E, Talmon J, Nykänen P, Brender J, De Keizer N. Increasingly dispersed innovative technologies require even greater trust: Promoting evidence-based Health Informatics. IMIA Yearbook 2011
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 71 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care: Trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 44-56.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 72 Del Beccaro MA, Jeffries HE, Eisenberg MA, Harry ED. Computerized provider order entry implementation: no association with increased mortality rates in an intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (Suppl. 01) 290-295.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 73 Ammenwerth E, Talmon J, Ash JS, Bates DW, Beuscart-Zephir MC, Duhamel A. et al. Impact of CPOE on mortality rates--contradictory findings, important messages. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 06) 586-593.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 74 Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand‘s community health centers: applying the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (Suppl. 06) 404-416.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 75 Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (Suppl. 04) 219-229.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 76 Koppel R, Metlay J, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio A, SE K. et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005; 293 (Suppl. 10) 1197-2003.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 77 Beuscart-Zéphir M, Elkin P, Pelayo S, Beuscart R. The human factors engineering approach to biomedical informatics projects: state of the art, results, benefits and challenges. Yearb Med Inform 2007 pp 109-127.
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 78 Various authors.. Medical informatics: Art of science?. Methods Inf Med 1996; 35: 155-201.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 79 Nagm F, Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Kennan MA. Is project evaluation methodology – Science or Art?. In: Newell S, Whitley E, Pouloudi N, Wareham J, Mathiassen L editors. Information Systems in a globalising world: Challenges, Ethics and Practice ECIS 2009, 17th European Conference on Information Systems Verona: June 8-10 2009
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 80 Ammenwerth E, Schreier G, Hayn D. Health informatics meets eHealth. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (Suppl. 03) 269-270.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 81 Blobel B, Zvarova J. eHealth: combining health telematics, telemedicine, biomedical engineering and bioinformatics to the edge. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (Suppl. 02) 121-122.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 82 Kouematchoua Tchuitcheu G, Rienhoff O. Options for diabetes management in sub-Saharan Africa with an electronic medical record system. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 01) 11-22.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 83 Bisbal J, Berry D. An analysis framework for electronic health record systems. Interoperation and collaboration in shared healthcare. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 180-189.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 84 Kimura M, Nakayasu K, Ohshima Y, Fujita N, Nakashima N, Jozaki H. et al. SS-MIX: A Ministry Project to Promote Standardized Healthcare Information Exchange. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 131-139.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 85 Dogac A, Yuksel M, Avci A, Ceyhan B, Hulur U, Eryilmaz Z. et al. Electronic health record interoper-ability as realized in the Turkish health information system. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 140-149.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 86 Alsos OA, Dabelow B, Faxvaag A. Doctors’ Concerns of PDAs in the Ward Round Situation. Lessons from a Formative Simulation Study. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 190-200.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 87 Bachlin M, Plotnik M, Roggen D, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM, Troster G. A wearable system to assist walking of Parkinson s disease patients. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (Suppl. 01) 88-95.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 88 Song B, Wolf KH, Gietzelt M, Al Scharaa O, Tegtbur U, Haux R. et al. Decision support for teletraining of COPD patients. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (Suppl. 01) 96-102.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 89 Thew SL, Sutcliffe A, de Bruijn O, McNaught J, Procter R, Jarvis P. et al. Supporting Creativity and Appreciation of Uncertainty in Exploring Geo-coded Public Health Data. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 158-165.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 90 Best W. Use of a digital electronic computer for evaluation of serial clinical observations in patients with acute leukemia. Methods Inf Med 1962; 1 (Suppl. 02) 56-62.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 91 Yoder RD, Swearingen DR, Schenthal JE, Sweeney JW, Nettleton WJ. An automated clinical information system. Methods Inf Med 1964; 3 (Suppl. 02) 45-50.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 92 Prokosch HU, Ganslandt T. Perspectives for Medical Informatics: Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research. Methods Inf Med 2009 48. 01
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 93 Chuang LY, Yang CS, Wu KC, Yang CH. Correlation-based gene selection and classification using Taguchi-BPSO. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (Suppl. 03) 254-268.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 94 Rector AL. Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard?. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38: 239-252.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 95 Cimino JJ. High-quality, Standard, Controlled Healthcare Terminologies Come of Age. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50 (Suppl. 02) 101-104.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 96 Davies FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perception, and behavioural impact. Int J Man-Machine Studies 1993 factors for failure or success 38: 475-487
    PubMed
  • 97 Bronzino J. Biomedical Engineering: A historical perspective. In: Enderle J, Blanchard S, Bronzino J editors. Introduction to Biomedical Engineering. Burlington MA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 98 Lindberg DAB. The computer and medical care. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas; 1968
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 99 Handels H, Ehrhardt J. Medical image computing for computer-supported diagnostics and therapy. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 11-17.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 100 Matthews PM, Honey GD, Bullmore ET. Applications of fMRI in translational medicine and clinical practice. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2006; 7: 732-744.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 101 Cai W, Chen X. Multimodality Molecular Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 113-128.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 102 Zilberman M. Active Implants and Scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Berlin: Springer; 2011
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 103 Hakim N. Artificial Organs. London: Springer; 2009. 104. Musen MA, Shahar Y, Shortliffe EH Clinical decision-support systems. In: Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ editors. Biomedical Informatics. New York: Springer; 2006
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 105 Hulot JS. Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine: lost in translation?. Genome Medicine 2010; 2: 13-16.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 106 Kohn DB, Candotti F. Gene therapy fulfilling its promise. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 518-521.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 107 Kulikowski CA, Kulikowski CW. Biomedical and health informatics in translational medicine. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 4-10.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 108 Kedar U, Phutane P, Shidhaye S, Kadam V. Advances in polymeric micelles for drug delivery and tumor targeting. Nanomedicine 2010; 6 (Suppl. 06) 714-729.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 109 van Bemmel JH. Medical Informatics is interdisciplinary avant la lettre. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 318-321.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 110 de Boer BA, Soufan AT, Hagoort J, Mohun TJ, van den Hoff MJ, Hasman A, Voorbraak FP, Moorman AF, Ruijter JM. The interactive presentation of 3D information obtained from reconstructed datasets and 3D placement of single histological sections with the 3D portable document format. Development 2011; 138 (Suppl. 01) 159-164.
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 111 Musen MA. Medical informatics: searching for underlying components. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (Suppl. 01) 12-19.
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar