PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2013; 52(03): 239-249
DOI: 10.3414/ME12-01-0096
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Prototyping Sensor Network System for Automatic Vital Signs Collection

Evaluation of a Location Based Automated Assignment of Measured Vital Signs to Patients
T. Kuroda
1   Kyoto University Hospital, Division of Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto, Japan
,
H. Noma
2   Ritsumeikan University, Department of Media Technology, Kusatsu, Japan
,
C. Naito
3   Kyoto University Hospital, Integrated Clinical Education Center, Kyoto, Japan
,
M. Tada
4   Kinki University, Department of Informatics, Higashi-Osaka, Japan
,
H. Yamanaka
5   Kyoto University Hospital, Department of Nursing, Kyoto, Japan
,
T. Takemura
6   University of Hyogo, Graduate School of Applied Informatics, Kobe, Japan
,
K. Nin
7   Kyoto University, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Kyoto, Japan
,
H. Yoshihara
8   Kyoto University, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto, Japan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 14. Oktober 2012

accepted: 04. April 2012

Publikationsdatum:
20. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objective: Development of a clinical sensor network system that automatically collects vital sign and its supplemental data, and evaluation the effect of automatic vital sensor value assignment to patients based on locations of sensors.

Methods: The sensor network estimates the data-source, a target patient, from the position of a vital sign sensor obtained from a newly developed proximity sensing system. The proximity sensing system estimates the positions of the devices using a Bluetooth inquiry process. Using Bluetooth access points and the positioning system newly developed in this project, the sensor network collects vital sign and its 4W (who, where, what, and when) supplemental data from any Blue-tooth ready vital sign sensors such as Continua-ready devices. The prototype was evaluated in a pseudo clinical setting at Kyoto University Hospital using a cyclic paired comparison and statistical analysis.

Results: The result of the cyclic paired analysis shows the subjects evaluated the proposed system is more effective and safer than POCS as well as paper-based operation. It halves the times for vital signs input and eliminates input errors. On the other hand, the prototype failed in its position estimation for 12.6% of all attempts, and the nurses overlooked half of the errors. A detailed investigation clears that an advanced interface to show the system’s “confidence”, i.e. the probability of estimation error, must be effective to reduce the oversights.

Conclusions: This paper proposed a clinical sensor network system that relieves nurses from vital signs input tasks. The result clearly shows that the proposed system increases the efficiency and safety of the nursing process both subjectively and objectively. It is a step toward new generation of point of nursing care systems where sensors take over the tasks of data input from the nurses.

Keywords

Ubiquitous computing - context awareness - point of care system - sensor network - Continua
 

  • References

  • 1 Takemura T, Kuroda K, Kume N, Okamoto K, Hori K, Oboshi N, Ashida N, Alasalmi A, Martikainen O, Yoshihara H. System Value Analysis of Multipoint Distribution of Realtime Locating System (RTLS) in Hospital. J eHealth Tech App 2008; 6 (02) 124-127.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Choi C, Chun J, Lee K, Lee S, Shin D, Hyun S, Kim D, Kim D. MobileNurse: hand-held information system for point of nursing care. Comp Meth Prog Biomed 2004; 74 (03) 245-254.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yu H. Lessons learned from the practical mobile health application development. Proc Annu Int Comput Soft App Conf. 2004: 28-30.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Murphy AL, Fleming M, Martin-Misener R, Sketris IS, MacCare M, Gass D. Drug information resources used by nurse practitioners and collaborating physicians at the point of care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a survey and review of the literature. BMC Nurs 2006; 5: 5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Happ BA. The effect of point of care technology on the quality of patient care. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993: 183-187.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Clements-Croome D. Creating the productive workplace. London: Taylor Francis; 1999.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kompier M, Cooper CL. Preventing stress, improving productivity: European case studies in the workplace. London: Routledge; 1999.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Krinsky LW. Stress and productivity. New York: Human Sciences Press; 1984.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Ali S, Zayad T, Hegab M. Modeling the effect of subjective factors on productivity of trenchless technology application to buried infrastructure systems. J Cons Eng Manage 2007; 133 (10) 743-748.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989; 13 (03) 319-339.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Mach Stud 1993; 38 (03) 475-487.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Holden RJ. The technology acceptance model: its pas and its future in health care. J Biomed Info 2010; 43 (01) 159-172.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dzik WH. New technology for transfusion safety. Brit J Hematology 2007; 136 (02) 181-190.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wright AA. Bar coding for patient safety. N Eng J Med 2005; 353: 329-331.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Anderson S. Using bar-code point-of-care technology for patient safety. J Healthcare Quality 2004; 26 (06) 5-11.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Perrin RA, Simpson N. RFID and bar codes - critical importance in enhancing safe patient care. J Healthc Inf Manag 2004; 18 (04) 33-39.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pantelopoulos A, Bourbakis NG. A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 2010; 40 (01) 1-12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rashid RA, Alias MA, Fisal N. Real time medical data acquisition over wireless ad-hoc network. Proc Asia-Pac Conf App Electr December. 2005: 20-21.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Fariborzi H, Moghavvemi M. Architecture of a wireless sensor network for vital signs transmission in hospital setting. Proc Int Conf Convergence Info Tech November. 2007: 745-749.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Damiwal N, Ramdasi D, Shriram R, Wakankar A. Wireless transfusion supervision and analysis using embedded system. Proc Int Conf Bioinfo Biomed Tech. 2010: 17-18.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Loh PKK, Allan L. Medical informatics system with wireless sensor network-enabled for hospitals. Proc Int Conf Intel Sens Sen Net Info Proc. 2005: 265-280.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Frehill P, Chambers D, Rotariu C. Using zigbee to integrate medical devices. Proc Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc. 2007: 6717-6720.
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Thongpithoonrat P, McKneely PK, Gumudavelli S, Gurkan D, Chapman FM. Networking and plug-and-play of bedside medical instruments. Proc Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Bio Soc. 2008: 1514-1517.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Triantafyllidis A, Koutkias V, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. An open and reconfigurable wireless sensor network for pervasive health monitoring. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 229-234.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ekahau. http://www.ekahau.com/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 AeroScout. http://www.aeroscout.com/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Christe B, Rogers R, Cooney E. Analysis of inpact of radio frequency identification asset management system in the healthcare setting. J Clin Eng 2010; 35 (01) 49-55.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Elnahrawy E, Martin RP. Studying the utility of tracking systems in improving healthcare workflow. Proc IEEE Int Conf Pervasive Comp Comm Workshop. 2010: 310-315.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Kuroda T, Alasalmi A, Martikainen O, Tadkemura T, Kume N, Kuroda Y, Oshiro O. Medical equipment logistics improvement based on location data. Proc Int Symp Med Info Comm Tech. 2007. CD-ROM
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Alasalmi A, Maritikainen O, Kuroda T, Kume N, Takemura T, Yoshihara H, Nagashima T, Oboshi N. Core nursing process improvement enabled by wireless services. Proc IFIP Wireless Days Conf. 2008: 1-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Ikonen J. Improving staff and patient security and optimizing the usage of medical equipment with ELAN positioning. Wireless Cities. 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Ho CY. WLAN Positioning for improving processes, patient care and service quality. Wireless Cities. 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Kuroda T, Takemura T, Noma H, Okamoto K, Kume N, Yoshihara H. Impact of Position Tracking on the Outpatient Navigation System. Proc IEEE Int Conf Eng Med Bio Soc. 2012: 6104-6106.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Bardram JE. Applications of context aware computing in hospital work-examples and design principles. Proc ACM Symp App Comp. 2004: 1574-1579.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Liu H, Banerjee P, Liu J. Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cibern C 2007; 37 (06) 1067-1080.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Coyle L, Neely S, Nixon P, Quigley A. Sensor aggregation and integration in healthcare location based services. Pervasive Health Conf Workshops. 2006: 1-4.
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 121-126.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Adida B, Sanyal A, Zabal S, Kohane IS, Mandl KD. Indivo x: developing a full substitutable personally controlled health record platform. Proc Am Med Inform Assoc Annu Symp. 2010: 6-10.
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Continua Health Alliance. http://www.continuaalliance.org/.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Caroll R, Cnossen R, Schnell M, Simons D. Continua: An interoperable personal healthcare ecosystem. Proc IEEE Pervasive Comp 2007; 6 (04) 90-94.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Wartena F, Schmitt L. Continua: the impact of a personal telehealth ecosystem. Proc Int Conf eHealth Telemed Soc Med. 2009: 13-18.
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Naya F, Noma H, Ohmura R, Kogure K. Bluetooth-based indoor proximity sensing for nursing context awareness. Proc IEEE Int Symp Wearable Comp. 2005: 212-231.
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Ohmura R, Naya F, Noma H, Kogure K. B-pack: a Bluetooth-based wearable sensing device for nursing activity recognition. Proc Int Symp Wireless Pervasive Comp. 2006: 16-18.
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Nagasawa S. Proposal of the cyclic paired comparisons. Knsei Eng Int 2003; 3 (04) 37-42.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nagasawa S. Present state of Kansei engineering in Japan. Proc IEEE Int Conf Sys Man Cybern 2004; 1: 333-338.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 1927; 34: 278-286.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Scheffe H. An analysis of variance for paired comparisons. J Am Statistical Assn 1952; 47 (259) 381-400.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Annual report of Kyoto University Hospital. http://www.kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~annual/. (Japanese)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. The medical service fees grading table. 2010. Japanese:
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Report of wage structure survey of 2008. 2009. Japanese:
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Kuroda T, Sasaki H, Suenaga T, Masuda Y, Yasumuro Y, Hori K, Ohboshi N, Takemura T, Chihara K, Yoshihara H. Embedded Ubiquitous Services on Hospital Information Systems. IEEE Trans Inform Tech Biomed 2012; 16 (06) 1216-1223.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Ohsaka A, Kobayashi M, Abe K. Cause of failure of a barcode-based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital. Transfus Med 2008; 18 (04) 216-222.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Snyder ML, Carter A, Jenkins K, Fantz CR. Patient misidentifications caused by errors in standard bar code technology. Clin Chem 2010; 56 (10) 1554-1560.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Howarth IC. The relationship between objective risk, subjective risk and behavior. Ergon 1988; 4: 527-535.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bardram JE. Pervasive Healthcare as a Scientific Discipline. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 178-185.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar