Development of an Open Metadata Schema for Prospective Clinical Research (openPCR) in China^[*]

Summary

Objectives: In China, deployment of electronic data capture (EDC) and clinical data management system (CDMS) for clinical research (CR) is in its very early stage, and about 90% of clinical studies collected and submitted clinical data manually. This work aims to build an open metadata schema for Prospective Clinical Research (openPCR) in China based on openEHR archetypes, in order to help Chinese researchers easily create specific data entry templates for registration, study design and clinical data collection.

Methods: Singapore Framework for Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAP) is used to develop openPCR and four steps such as defining the core functional requirements and deducing the core metadata items, developing archetype models, defining metadata terms and creating archetype records, and finally developing implementation syntax are followed.

Results: The core functional requirements are divided into three categories: requirements for research registration, requirements for trial design, and requirements for case report form (CRF). 74 metadata items are identified and their Chinese authority names are created. The minimum metadata set of openPCR includes 3 documents, 6 sections, 26 top level data groups, 32 lower data groups and 74 data elements. The top level container in openPCR is composed of public document, internal document and clinical document archetypes. A hierarchical structure of openPCR is established according to Data Structure of Electronic Health Record Architecture and Data Stand -ard of China (Chinese EHR Standard). Meta-data attributes are grouped into six parts: identification, definition, representation, relation, usage guides, and administration.

Discussions and Conclusion: OpenPCR is an open metadata schema based on research registration standards, standards of the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) and Chinese healthcare related stand -ards, and is to be publicly available throughout China. It considers future integration of EHR and CR by adopting data structure and data terms in Chinese EHR Standard. Archetypes in openPCR are modularity models and can be separated, recombined, and reused. The authors recommend that the method to develop openPCR can be referenced by other countries when designing metadata schema of clinical research. In the next steps, openPCR should be used in a number of CR projects to test its applicability and to continuously improve its coverage. Besides, metadata schema for research protocol can be developed to structurize and standardize protocol, and syntactical interoperability of openPCR with other related standards can be considered.

Keywords

Metadata - archetype - electronic health record (EHR) - clinical research (CR) - Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DC Metadata Element Set)

^* Supplementary material published on our website www.methods-online.com

• References

• 1 Kohl CD, Garde S, Knaup P. Facilitating secondary use of medical data by using openEHR archetypes. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160 Pt [phone].
• 2 Xu Wei, Li Tiejun, Wu Cheng. Current situation on the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in 5 leading Chinese medical journals Original Research Article. Journal of Medical Colleges of PLA 2009; 24 (02) 105-111.
• 3 Babre D. Electronic data capture - Narrowing the gap between clinical and data management. Perspect Clin Res 2011; 2 (01) 1-3.
• 4 The eClinical Forum and PhRMAEDC Task Group. The Future Vsion of Electronic Health Records as eSource for Clinical Research. (Homepage on the Internet) ©2006. (Updated May 3, 2006 cited Sept 20, 2009). Available from http://www.esi-bethesda.com/ncrrworkshops/clinicalresearch/pdf/catherineceligrantpaper.pdf
• 5 EHR/CR Functional Profile Working Group. EHR/CR Functional Profile. Informative Level Ballot Release 1. ©2007. (Updated Aug 2007 cited Sept 20, 2009). Available from http://www.ehrcr.org/Docs/EHR-CR_Functional_Profile.pdf
• 6 Ohmann C, Kuchinke W. Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 45-54.
• 7 Knaup P, Garde S, Merzweiler A. et al Towards shared patient records: an architecture for using routine data for nationwide research. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 (03) [phone].
• 8 Chen R, Enberg G, Klein GO. Julius - a template based supplementary electronic health record system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007; 7: 10
• 9 Matsumura Y, Kuwata S, Yamamoto Y. et al Template-based data entry for general description in medical records and data transfer to data warehouse for analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007; 129 Pt [phone].
• 10 Li Jianming. Brief analysis the difference on the good clinical practice in ICH and China. Chin J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 26 (09) 707-710.
• 11 Drug Clinical Trial and the Quality Control Standard of China. (Cited Nov 20, 2012). Avail-able from http://www.sfda.gov.cn/WS01/CL0053/24473.html
• 12 Evans T, Gülmezoglu M, Pang T. Registering clinical trials: an essential role for WHO. Lancet 2004; 363 09419 1413-1414.
• 13 Liu X, Li Y, Wu T, Liu G, Li J. A Survey of the Status of Funding of Registered Chinese Clinical Trials Survey of registration of funded clinical trial in China. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2008; 8 (05) 305-311.
• 14 Notification of using the web based electronic Clinical Research Manager. (April 12, 2013). Available from http://f1.clinicaltrialecrf.org/doc/2012/9/4/16450816900265829955.pdf
• 15 Kirklin JW, Vicinanza SS. Metadata and computer-based patient records. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68 (Suppl. 03) (Suppl) S23-24.
• 16 Brandt CA, Morse R, Matthews K. et al Metadata-driven creation of data marts from an EAV-modeled clinical research database. Int J Med Inform 2002; 65 (03) 225-241.
• 17 ISO 23081-1 Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records - Part 1: Principles. [S] Geneva: ISO copyright office 2006
• 18 Beale T, Heard S. openEHR Architecture: Architecture Overview. ©2008. (Updated Nov 13, 2008 cited Sept 20, 2009). Available from http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/overview.pdf
• 19 Beale T. Archetypes: Constraint-based Domain Models for Future-proof Information Systems. ©2002. (Updated 2002 cited May 5, 2011.) Available from http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_oopsla_2002.pdf
• 20 Garde S, Knaup P, Schuler T, Hovenga E. Can openEHR Archetypes Empower Multi-Centre Clinical Research?. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 971-976.
• 21 Karen Coyle, Thomas Baker. Guidelines for Dublin Core Application Profiles. © 1995-2011. (Updated May 18, 2009; cited Sept. 20, 2009.) Available from http://dublincore.org/documents/2009/05/18/profile-guidelines/
• 22 Ottawa Statement on Trial Registration. ©2005-2013. (April 12, 2013.) Available from http://ottawagroup.ohri.ca/index.html
• 23 ISO 23081-2: Information and documentation-Managing metadata for records - Part 2: Conceptual and implementation issues. [S] Geneva: ISO copyright office. 2006
• 24 Beale T, Heard S, Kalra D, Lloyd D. The openEHR Reference Model: Support Information Model. ©2007. (Updated April 8 2007 cited Aug 9, 2012.) Available from http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/support_im.pdf
• 25 Tu SW, Carini S, Rector A. et al. OCRe: An Ontology of Clinical Research. (Cited July 9, 2013.) Available from http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2009/abstracts/S8P2Tu.pdf
• 26 Hassanzadeh O, Kementsietsidis A, Lim L, Miller RJ, Wang M. LinkedCT: A Linked Data Space for Clinical Trials. (Cited July 9, 2013.) Available from ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/reports/csri/596/ LinkedCT.pdf
• 27 http://www.openehr.org/ckm/
• 28 Hillmann Diane. Using Dublin Core. ©2005. (Updated Nov 7, 2005 cited Aug 9, 2012.) Avail-able from http://www.dublincore.org/documents/usageguide/
• 29 Darmoni SJ, Thirion BJ, Leroy P. et al. The use of Dublin Core metadata in a structured health resource guide on the Internet Bull Med Libr Assoc 2001 89 (03) 297-301.
• 30 Robertson WD, Leadem EM, Dube J. et al Design and implementation of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Dublin Core Metadata Schema. ©2005. (Updated Oct 2001 cited Aug 9, 2012.) Available from http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/658/654
• 31 NISO: A Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections. (Cited April 12, 2013). Available from http://framework.niso.org/node/5