Exploring Possibilities for Transforming Established Subscription-based Scientific Journals into Open Access Journals

Summary

Background: Based on today‘s information and communication technologies the open access paradigm has become an important approach for adequately communicating new scientific knowledge.

Objectives: Summarizing the present situa -tion for journal transformation. Presenting criteria for adequate transformation as well as a specific approach for it. Describing our exemplary implementation of such a journal transformation.

Methods: Studying the respective literature as well as discussing this topic in various discussion groups and meetings (primarily of editors and publishers, but also of authors and readers), with long term experience as editors and /or publishers of scientific publications as prerequisite.

Results: There is a clear will, particularly of political and funding organizations, towards open access publishing. In spite of this, there is still a large amount of scientific knowl edge, being communicated through subscription-based journals. For successfully transforming such journals into open access, sixteen criteria for a goal-oriented, stepwise, sustainable, and fair transformation are suggested. The Tandem Model as transformation approach is introduced. Our exemplary implementation is done in the Trans-O-MIM project. It is exploring strategies, models and evaluation metrics for journal transforma tion. As instance the journal Methods of Information in Medicine will apply the Tandem Model from 2017 onwards.

Conclusions: Within Trans-O-MIM we will reach at least nine of the sixteen criteria for adequate transformation. It was positive to implement Trans-O-MIM as international research project. After first steps for transforming Methods have successfully been made, challenges will remain, among others, in identifying appropriate incentives for open access publishing in order to support its transformation.

Keywords

Scientific journals - open access - subscription - journal transformation - journal conversion - journal flipping - journal transition

• References

• 1 Björk BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012; 10: 73.
• 2 Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Open access: changing global science publishing. Croat Med J 2013; 54: 403-406.
• 3 Suber P. Open access. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012
• 4 Wolpert AJ. For the sake of inquiry and knowledge – the inevitability of open access. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 785-787.
• 5 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. [cited 2016 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.dfg.de
• 6 International Medical Informatics Association. [cited 2016 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.imia.org
• 7 European Federation for Medical Informatics Association. [cited 2016 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.efmi.org
• 8 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie. [cited 2016 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.gmds.de
• 9 Haux R. On determining factors for good research in biomedical and health informatics. Yearb Med Inform 2014; 9: 255-264.
• 10 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.. Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientic Practice. Bonn: DFG; 1998
• 11 Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. 2003 [cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from: https://openaccess.mpg.de/67605/berlin_declaration_engl.pdf
• 12 PubMed – US National Library of Medicine. [cited 2016 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
• 13 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.. Taking Digital Transformation to the Next Level. The Contribution of the DFG to an Innovative Information Infrastructure for Research. Bonn: DFG; 2012. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/lis/strategy_paper_digital_transformation.pdf
• 14 Open Access in Deutschland – Die Strategie des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. [Open Access in Germany – The Strategy of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research]. Berlin: BMBF; 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.bmbf.de/pub/Open_Access_in_Deutschland.pdf
• 15 European Commission.. Towards better access to scientific information: Boosting the benefits of public investments in research. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/era-communication-towards-better-access-to-scientific-information_en.pdf
• 16 European Commission: European Open Science Policy Platform. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-policy-platform
• 17 Knowledge Exchange. Open Access [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.knowledge-exchange.info
• 18 OA2020.. New initiative to boost Open Access. Research organizations declare support for an OA transformation of scholarly journals. Munich: Max Planck; 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.mpg.de/openaccess/oa2020
• 19 Science Europe Roadmap December 2013. Brussels: Science Europe; 2013. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.scienceeurope.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/05/ScienceEurope_Road-map.pdf
• 20 Swan A. Policy Guidelines for the Development and Promotion of Open Access. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); 2012. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215863e.pdf
• 21 Eglen S. Open access: sharing your data is easier than you think. Nature 2014; 510 7505 340.
• 22 Frisch NK, Nathan R, Ahmed YK, Shidham VB. Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals – A five year (2007–2011) experience. Cytojournal 2014; 11: 10.
• 23 Van Noorden R. Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature 2013; 495 7442 426-429. Errata in 496(7444): 151 and 499(7456): 19.
• 24 Frank M. Open but not free – publishing in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 787-789.
• 25 Carroll MW. Creative Commons and the openness of open access. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 789-791.
• 26 Haug C. The downside of open-access publishing. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 791-793.
• 27 Goodhill GJ. Open access: Practical costs of data sharing. Nature 2014; 509 7498 33.
• 28 Butler D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature 2013; 495 7442 433-435.
• 29 Pierce GN. Is open-access publishing the wave of the future in science?. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2014; 92 (Suppl. 05) iii.
• 30 Shen C, Björk BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med 2015; 13: 230.
• 31 Archambault E, Amyot D, Deschamps P, Nicol A, Rebout L, Roberge G. Proportion of Open Access peer-reviewed papers at the European and world levels – 2004–2011. Quebec: Science-Metrix; 2013. [cited 2016 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Availability_2004–2011.pdf
• 32 Björk BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med 2012; 10: 73.
• 33 Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk BC, Hedlund T. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One 2011; 6: e20961.
• 34 Kurata K, Morioka T, Yokoi K, Matsubayashi M. Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One 2013; 8: e60925.
• 35 Solomon DJ, Laakso M, Björk BC. (authors). Peter Suber (editor). Converting Scholarly Journals to Open Access: A Review of Approaches and Experiences. Boston: Harvard Library; 2016. [cited 2016 Oct 17]. Available from: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/27803834/DASH%20Version-Journal-flipping-final-Aug4–2016-print-2.pdf?sequence=3
• 36 Trans-O-MIM at PLRI. [cited 2016 Oct 22]. Available from: https://plri.de/en/forschung/projekte/trans-o-mim-tom
• 37 Trans-O-MIM at DFG. [cited 2016 Oct 22]. Available from: http://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/2749/74695?language=en
• 38 McCray AT, Gefeller O, Aronsky D, Leong TY, Sarkar IN, Bergemann D. et al. The birth and evolution of a discipline devoted to information in biomedicine and health care. As reflected in its longest running journal. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 491-507.
• 39 Haux R, Aronsky D, Leong TY, McCray AT. Methods in year 50: preserving the past and preparing for the future. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 1-6.
• 40 Winter A, Haux R, Bickeböller H. “Tradition is not preserving the ashes, it is passing on the fire”. On strengthening ties with GMDS. Methods Inf Med 2013; 52: 1-2.
• 41 Methods of Information in Medicine. [cited 2016 Oct 22]. Available from: http://www.methods-online.com
• 42 Koch S, Haux R, Gefeller O, Sarkar N, Bergemann D. Methods Open – A New Journal Track is Starting in 2017. Methods Inf Med 2016; 55: 478-480.