Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2018; 57(03): 129-134
DOI: 10.3414/ME17-02-0002
Focus Theme – Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Quantification of the Central Cardiovascular Network Applying the Normalized Short-time Partial Directed Coherence Approach in Healthy Subjects

Steffen Schulz
1   Institute of Innovative Health Technologies IGHT, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Germany
,
Mathias Bolz
2   Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
,
Karl-Jürgen Bär
3   Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Pain and Autonomics-Integrative Research, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
,
Andreas Voss
1   Institute of Innovative Health Technologies IGHT, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Germany
› Author AffiliationsThis work has been partly supported by grants from the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (KF 2447308KJ4 and KF 2447309KJ4).
Further Information

Publication History

received: 27 June 2017

accepted: 26 February 2018

Publication Date:
02 May 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: The central control of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the complex interplay of its components can be described by a functional integrated mode – the central autonomic network (CAN). CAN represents the integrated functioning and interaction between the central nervous system (CNS) and ANS (parasympathetic and sympathetic activity).

Objective: This study investigates the central cardiovascular network (CCVN) as a part of the CAN, during which heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SYS) and frontal EEG activity in 21 healthy subjects (CON) will be analysed. The objective of this study is to determine how these couplings (central-cardiovascular) are composed by the different regulatory aspects of the CNS-ANS interaction.

Methods: To quantify the short-term instantaneous causal couplings within the CCVN, the normalized short time partial directed coherence (NSTPDC) approach was applied. It is based on an m-dimensional MAR process to determine Granger causality in the frequency domain.

Results: We found that CCVN were of bidirectional character, and that the causal influences of central activity towards HR were stronger than those towards systolic blood pressure. This suggests that the central-cardiac closed-loop regulation process in CON focuses mainly on adapting the heart rate via the sinoatrial node rather than focusing on SYS. The CNS-ANS coupling directions with respect to central spectral power bands were characterized as mostly bidirectional, where HR and SYS acted as drivers in nearly every frequency band (unidirectional for α, α1 and α2).

Conclusion: This study provides a more indepth understanding of the interplay of neuronal and autonomic cardiovascular regulatory processes in healthy subjects, as well as a greater insight into the complex CAN.

Keywords

Autonomous nervous system - causal coupling analysis - central cardiovascular network - central autonomic network - partial directed coherence

 

  • References

  • 1 Heatherton TF, Wagner DD. Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15 (03) 132-139.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Thayer JF, Ahs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers 3rd JJ, Wager TD. A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012; 36 (02) 747-756.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Thayer JF, Lane RD. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. J Affect Disord 2000; 61 (03) 201-216.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Dampney RA. Functional organization of central pathways regulating the cardiovascular system. Physiol Rev 1994; 74 (02) 323-364.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Beissner F, Meissner K, Bar KJ, Napadow V. The autonomic brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis for central processing of autonomic function. J Neurosci 2013; 33 (25) 10503-10511.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Thayer JF. What the Heart Says to the Brain (and vice versa) and Why We Should Listen. Psychological Topics 2007; 16 (02) 241-250.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 He B, Liu Z. Multimodal functional neuroimaging: integrating functional MRI and EEG/MEG. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2008; 01: 23-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Portnova GV, Tetereva A, Balaev V, Atanov M, Skiteva L, Ushakov V. et al. Correlation of BOLD Signal with Linear and Nonlinear Patterns of EEG in Resting State EEG-Informed fMRI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2018; 11: 654.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Murta T, Leite M, Carmichael DW, Figueiredo P, Lemieux L. Electrophysiological correlates of the BOLD signal for EEG-informed fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36 (01) 391-414.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Laufs H, Krakow K, Sterzer P, Eger E, Beyerle A, Salek-Haddadi A. et al. Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100 (19) 11053-11058.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schulz S, Bolz M, Bär KJ, Voss A. Central-and Autonomic Nervous System Coupling in Schizophrenia. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2016; 374: 2067.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schulz S, Bär KJ, Voss A. Analyses of Heart Rate, Respiration and Cardiorespiratory Coupling in Patients with Schizophrenia. Entropy 2015; 17 (02) 483-501.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Adochiei F, Schulz S, Edu I, Costin H, Voss A. A New Normalised Short Time PDC for Dynamic Coupling Analyses. Biomed Tech (Berl). Sep. 7 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Basar E, Guntekin B. A review of brain oscillations in cognitive disorders and the role of neurotransmitters. Brain Res 2008; 1235: 172-193.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar