Informatics and Medicine

Summary

Objectives: To clarify challenges and research topics for informatics in health and to describe new approaches for interdisciplinary collaboration and education. Methods: Research challenges and possible solutions were elaborated by scientists of two universities using an interdisciplinary approach, in a series of meetings over several months. Results and Conclusion: In order to translate scientific results from bench to bedside and further into an evidence-based and efficient health system, intensive collaboration is needed between experts from medicine, biology, informatics, engineering, public health, as well as social and economic sciences. Research challenges can be attributed to four areas: bioinformatics and systems biology, biomedical engineering and informatics, health informatics and individual healthcare, and public health informatics. In order to bridge existing gaps between different disciplines and cultures, we suggest focusing on interdisciplinary education, taking an integrative approach and starting interdisciplinary practice at early stages of education.

* See more detailed authors´ affiliations at the end of the article.

Keywords

Informatics - bioinformatics - health informatics - biomedical engineering - biomedical informatics - public health

• References

• 1 Steinbuch K. Informatik: Automatische Informationsverarbeitung. SEG-Nachrichten 1957: 4.
• 2 Dreyfus P. L’informatique. Paris: Gestion; 1962 pp 240-241.
• 3 Mikhailov AI, Chernyl AI, Gilyarevskii RS. Informatika – novoe nazvanie teorii nauãnoj informacii. Nauãno tehniãeskaja informacija 1966; 12: 35-39.
• 4 Shortliffe EH, (ed), Cimino JJ. (assoc ed). Biomedical Informatics (3rd ed). New York: 2006
• 5 Boston Consulting 2006.. Internationales Benchmarking der Innovationsleistung für Pharma, Medizintechnik und Healthcare-IT. Berlin: Boston Consulting Group; March 2006. www.amcham.de/fileadmin/templates/main/pdf/bcgbenchmark-study.pdf Accessed 2008-05-14.
• 6 ESPICOM 2005.. ESPICOM World Medical Market Report. 2005
• 7 Maojo V, Garcia-Remesal M, Billhardt H, Alonso-Calvo R, Perez-Rey D, Martin-Sanchez F. Designing New Methodologies for Integrating Biomedical Information in Clinical Trias. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 180-185.
• 8 Maojo V, Martin-Sanchez F. Bioinformatics: Towards New Directions for Public Health. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 208-214.
• 9 Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Lopez-Campos G. Integrating Genomics into Health Information Systems. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 25-30.
• 10 Oliveira IC, Oliveira JL, Sanchez JP, López-Alonso V, Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Sousa Pereira A. Grid Requirements for the Integration of Biomedical Information Resources for Health Applications. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (Suppl. 02) 161-167.
• 11 Anderson NR, Lee ES, Brockenbrough JS, Minie ME, Fuller S, Brinkley J, Tarczy-Hornoch P. Issues in Biomedical Research Data Management and Analysis: Needs and Barriers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (Suppl. 04) 478-488.
• 12 Martin-Sanchez F, Iakovidis I, Norager S, Maojo V, de Groen P, Van der Lei J, Jones T, Abraham-Fuchs K, Apweiler R, Babic A, Baud R, Breton V, Cinquin P, Doupi P, Dugas M, Eils R, Engelbrecht R, Ghazal P, Jehenson P, Kulikowski C, Lampe K, De Moor G, Orphanoudakis S, Rossing N, Sarachan B, Sousa A, Spekowius G, Thireos G, Zahlmann G, Zvarova J, Hermosilla I, Vicente FJ. Synergy Between Medical Informatics and Bioinformatics: Facilitating Genomic Medicine for Future Health Care. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37 (Suppl. 01) 30-42.
• 13 Haux R. Aims and Tasks of Medical Informatics. Int J Med Inform 1997; 44: 9-87.
• 14 Greenes RA, Lorenzi NM. Audacious Goals for Health and Biomedical Informatics in the New Millennium. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 395-400.
• 15 Musen MA, van Bemmel JH. (eds). Challenges for Medical Informatics as an Academic Discipline. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 1-3.
• 16 http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/clinical_research_resources/clinical_and_translational_science_awards/. Accessed 2008-05-14.
• 17 Kulikowski CA. The Micro-Macro Spectrum of Medical Informatics Challenges: From Molecular Medicine to Transforming Health Care in a Globalizing Society. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41: 20-24.
• 18 Hersh W, Williamson J. Educating 10,000 informaticians by 2010: the AMIA 10 × 10 program. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76: 377-382.
• 19 Hersh WR. Who are the informaticians? What we know and should know. JAMIA 2006; 13: 166-170.
• 20 Ash JS, Anderson NR, Tarczy-Hornoch P. People and Organizational Issues in Research Systems Implementation. JAMIA PrePrint: Accepted article. Published February 28, 2008 as doi:10.1197/jamia.M2582.
• 21 Imperial College London, Department of Bioengineering.. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/pls/ portallive/docs/1/51182.PDF Accessed 2008-05-14.
• 22 Bronzino J. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. CRC Press; 2000
• 23 Bronzino J. Medical Devices and Systems. Taylor and Francis; 2006
• 24 Rosse C, Mejino Jr JL. A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. J Biomed Inform 2003; 36 (Suppl. 06) 478-500.
• 25 Rosse C. Anatomy atlases. Clin Anat 1999; 12 (Suppl. 04) 293-299. Review.
• 26 MacKenzie-Graham A, Boline J, Toga AW. Brain atlases and neuroanatomic imaging. Methods Mol Biol 2007; 401: 183-194.
• 27 Gering DT, Nabavi A, Kikinis R, Hata N, O’Donnell LJ, Grimson WE, Jolesz FA, Black PM, Wells 3rd. WM. An Integrated Visualization System for Surgical Planning and Guidance Using Image Fusion and an Open MR. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13 (Suppl. 06) 967-975.
• 28 Deserno TM, Antani S, Long R. Ontology of Gaps in Content-Based Image Retrieval. J Digit Imaging 2008 (Epub ahead of print).
• 29 WHO 2004.. eHealth for Health Care Delivery Draft Strategy. Geneva, World Health Organization, Department of Essential Health Technologies; 2004
• 30 Iakovidis I. EMBEC ’05, Prague November 23, 2005. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/docs/events/embec05/iakovidisembec05-0.pdf. Accessed 2008-05-14.
• 31 WHO 2000.. The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000
• 32 Mitchell J. From Telehealth to e-Health: the Unstoppable Rise of e-Health. Canberra: National Office for the Information Economy, Dept of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts 1999
• 33 Chaudry B, Wang J, Shinyi W, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 742-752.
• 34 Cleland JGF, Louis A, Rigby AS, Janssens U, Balk AHMM. on behalf of the TEN-HMS Investigators.. Noninvasive Home Telemonitoring for Patients with Heart Failure at High Risk of Recurrent Admission and Death. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1654-1664.
• 35 Blumenthal D, Glaser JP. Information Technology Comes to Medicine. N Engl J Med 2007; 356 (24) 2527-2534.
• 36 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From Hospital Information Systems to Health Information Systems. Problems, Challenges, Perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (Suppl. 04) 275-287.
• 37 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Lapão L, Wurst SH. Expanding the Scope of Health Information Systems – From Hospitals to Regional Networks, to National Infrastructures, and Beyond. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (Suppl. 04) 500-502.
• 38 Lehmann CU, Altuwaijri MM, Li YC, Ball MJ, Haux R. Editorial: Translational Research in Medical Informatics or from Theory to Practice. A Call for an Applied Informatics Journal. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (Suppl. 01) 1-3.
• 39 Lenz R, Beyer M, Kuhn KA. Semantic Integration in Healthcare Networks. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 2-3 201-207.
• 40 Ball MJ, Silva JS, Bierstock S, Douglas JV, Norcio AF, Chakraborty J, Srini J. Failure to Provide Clinicians Useful IT Systems: Opportunities to Leapfrog Current Technologies. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (Suppl. 01) 4-7.
• 41 Leidl R, Stratmann D. Economic Evaluation Is Essential in Health Care for the Elderly: A Viewpoint. Drugs and Aging 1998; 13 (Suppl. 05) 255-262.
• 42 von der Schulenburg JM, Greiner W, Jost F, Klusen N, Kubin M, Leidl R, Mittendorf T, Rebscher H, Schoeffski O, Vauth C, Volmer T, Wahler S, Wasem J, Weber C. and the Hanover Consensus Group.. German recommendations on health economic evaluation – Third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus. Value in Health 2008, online January 11th, doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00301.x