Early kinematic outcome after treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture by tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in the dog

M. de Medeiros; M. Sánchez Bustinduy; H. Radke; S. Langley-Hobbs; N. Jeffery

doi:10.3415/VCOT-10-02-0028

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24(03): 178-184
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-10-02-0028

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Early kinematic outcome after treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture by tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in the dog

Autoren

M. de Medeiros

¹University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
M. Sánchez Bustinduy

¹University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
H. Radke

¹University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
S. Langley-Hobbs

²University of Cambridge, Veterinary School Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
N. Jeffery

¹University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

als PDF herunterladen

Summary

Objectives: To establish the effect of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) on two selected pelvic limb kinematic variables in dogs treated for clinical cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR).

Methods: Thirteen dogs that had incurred CCLR and were treated by TPLO walked on a treadmill whilst kinematic data on pelvic limb paw motion were acquired using motion capture equipment. Data were subject to secondary processing using matrix analysis software and statistical analysis.

Results: Pelvic limb stance duration significantly increased during the 12 week study period, recovering to near-normal values. Range of pelvic limb paw velocity also significantly increased but did not reach normal values by 12 weeks postoperatively.

Clinical significance: The improvement in stance duration to near normality may aid in explaining the widely-held subjective impression that TPLO frequently provides an excellent outcome in the early stages after repair of the cruciate deficient canine stifle joint. Both stance length and range of paw velocity provide useful objective measures to compare outcome following surgery for CCLR.

Keywords

Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy - stifle - lameness

PDF (394 kb)

Referenzen

References
1 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
2 De Rooster H, De Bruin T, Van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 769-780.
3 Brandt KD, Myers SL, Burr D. et al. Osteoarthritic changes in canine articular cartilage, subchondral bone, and synovium fifty-four months after transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 1560-1570.
4 Doverspike M, Vasseur PB, Harb MF. et al. Contra-lateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture: incidence in 114 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 167-170.
5 DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 157: 79-84.
6 Smith GK, Torg JS. Fibular head transposition for repair of cruciate deficient stifle in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 375-383.
7 Arnoczky SP, Tarvn GB, Marshall JL. The “over the top” procedure: a technique for anterior cruciate ligament substitution in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979; 15: 283-290.
8 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
9 Kim SE, Pozzi A, Kowalesky MP. et al. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 111-125.
10 Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in dog. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 93-98.
11 Linko E, Harilainen A, Malmivaara A. et al. Surgical versus conservative interventions for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in adults. Coch Data Syst Rev 2005; 2: CD001356.
12 Chauvet AE, Johnson AL, Pijanowski GJ. et al. Evaluation of fibular head transposition, lateral fabellar suture, and conservative treatment for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in large dogs: a retrospective study. J Am Hosp Assoc 1996; 32: 462-463.
13 Moore KW, Read RA. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog: a retrospective study comparing surgical techniques. Aust Vet J 1995; 72: 281-285.
14 Corr SA, Brown C. A comparison of outcomes following tibial plateu levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy procedures. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 4: 312-319.
15 Innes JF, Bacon D, Lynch C. et al. Long-term outcome of surgery for dogs with cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Veterinary Rec 2000; 147: 325-328.
16 Ballagas AJ, Montgomery RD, Henderson RA. et al. Pre- and postoperative forceplate analysis of dogs with experimentally transected cranial cruciate ligaments treated using tibial plateau levelling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 187-190.
17 Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J. et al. Use of force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 389-393.
18 Conzemius MG, Evans RB, Besancon MF. et al. Effect of surgical technique on limb function after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 2: 232-236.
19 Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimizaton of force platform gait analysis in labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at walking gait. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 445-449.
20 Madore E, Huneault L, Moreau M. et al. Comparison of trot kinetics between dogs with stifle or hip arthrosis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 102-107.
21 Lee JY, Kim G, Kim JH. et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the hind limb after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy and cranial tibial wedge osteotomy in 10 dogs. J Vet Med 2007; 54: 579-584.
22 Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T C. et al. Kinematic analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 739-743.
23 McLaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31: 193-201.
24 Waxman AS, Robinson DA, Evans RB. et al. Relationship between objective and subjective assessment of limb function in normal dogs with an experimentally induced lameness. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 241-246.
25 Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D. et al. Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 173-180.
26 Sanchez-Bustinduy M, de Medeiros MA, Radke H. et al. Comparison of Kinematic Variables in Defining Lameness Caused by Naturally Occurring Rupture of the Cranial Cruciate Ligament in Dogs. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 523-530.
27 DeCamp CE, Riggs CM, Olivier NB. et al. Kinematic evaluation of gait in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 120-126.