Comparison of the tibia plateau angle between small and large dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease

A. Aertsens; J. Rinco Alvarez; C. M. Poncet; H. Beaufrère; G. R. Ragetly

doi:10.3415/VCOT-14-12-0180

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28(06): 385-390
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-14-12-0180

Original Research

Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of the tibia plateau angle between small and large dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease

A. Aertsens

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France

,

J. Rinco Alvarez

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France

,

C. M. Poncet

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France

,

H. Beaufrère

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France

,

G. R. Ragetly

¹Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Summary

Objectives: To compare the conformation of the proximal tibia evaluated on a medio- lateral radiograph between small and large dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease (CCLD).

Methods: Retrospective clinical study with dogs having radiographic evaluation and CCLD confirmed at surgery. The first group (n = 52) was comprised of dogs weighing less than 15 kg and the second group (n = 52) of dogs weighing more than 15 kg. The tibial plateau angle (TPA), the relative tibial tube-rosity width (rTTW), and the Z angle were measured on preoperative radiographs with imaging measurement software. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of weight, age, sex, and neutered status on radiographic measurements and to estimate interobserver variabilities.

Results: The small dog group had a greater TPA (30.1° ± 5.3; p <0.001 with a mean difference of 4.9° [95% CI: 3.8–6.0]) and Z angle (69.9° ± 5.6; p<0.001 with a mean difference of 6.1° ([95% CI: 4.9–7.4]) than the large dog group. Sex and neutered status further influenced the TPA and Z angle val -ues. No significant effect was observed on the rTTW values. A strong correlation was found between the TPA and the Z angle (r = 0.61, p <0.001). Variances were not significantly different between observers. Overall the interobserver variability was low suggesting that agreement was good.

Clinical significance: Small dogs with CCLD have a steeper tibial plateau than large dogs with CCLD. Sex and neutered status also had an effect on some measured variables. This anatomical difference could influence the surgical technique, which may affect the outcome. The good interobserver agreement suggests the observer is unlikely to influence surgical planning.

Keywords

Canine - cranial cruciate ligament disease - tibial plateau - predisposition

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Bergh MS, Sullivan C, Ferrell CL. et al. Systematic review of surgical treatments for cranial cruciate ligament disease in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2014; 50: 315-321.
2 Cook JL. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture.. In: Muir P.. editor. Advances in the Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament Ames (IA): Wiley-Blackwell; 2010: 95-99.
3 Ragetly CA, Evans R, Mostafa AA. et al. Multivariate analysis of morphometric characteristics to evaluate risk factors for cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 327-333.
4 Duerr FM, Duncan CG, Savicky RS. et al. Risk factors for excessive tibial plateau angle in large-breed dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1688-1691.
5 Read RA, Robins GM. Deformity of the proximal tibia in dogs. Vet Rec 1982; 111: 295-298.
6 Macias C, McKee WM, May C. Caudal proximal tibial deformity and cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small-breed dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2002; 43: 433-438.
7 Selmi AL, Padilha Filho JG. Rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament associated with deformity of the proximal tibia in five dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2001; 42: 390-393.
8 Ragetly CA, Griffon DJ, Klump LM. et al. Pelvic limb kinetic and kinematic analysis in Labrador Retrievers predisposed or at a low risk for cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 973-982.
9 Griffon DJ. A review of the pathogenesis of canine cranial cruciate ligament disease as a basis for future preventive strategies. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 399-409.
10 Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ, Pozzi A. . In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA.. editors. Veterinary Surgery Small Animal. Vol 1 St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2012: 906-98.
11 Hayes GM, Granger N, Langley-Hobbs SJ. et al. Abnormal reflex activation of hamstring muscles in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Vet J 2013; 196: 345-350.
12 Buote N, Fusco J, Radasch R. Age, tibial plateau angle, sex, and weight as risk factors for contralateral rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in Labradors. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 481-489.
13 Adams P, Bolus R, Middleton S. et al. Influence of signalment on developing cranial cruciate rupture in dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2011; 52: 347-352.
14 Comerford E, Forster K, Gorton K. et al. Management of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in small dogs: a questionnaire study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 493-497.
15 Slocum B, Slocum T. Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin N Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
16 Witte PG, Scott HW. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in small breed dogs with high tibial plateau angles using a 4-hole 1.9/2.5 mm locking T-plate. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 549-557.
17 Duerr FM, Duncan CG, Savicky RS. et al. Comparison of surgical treatment options for cranial cruciate ligament disease in large-breed dogs with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 49-62.
18 Talaat MB, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and cranial closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifles with excessive tibial plateau angle. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 729-739.
19 Wilke VL, Conzemius MG, Besancon MF. et al. Comparison of tibial plateau angle between clinically normal Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers with and without rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1426-1429.
20 Caylor KB, Zumpano CA, Evans LM. et al. Intra- and interobserver measurement variability of tibial plateau slope from lateral radiographs in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2001; 37: 263-268.
21 Grierson J, Sanders M, Guitan J. et al. Comparison of anatomical tibial plateau angle versus observer measurement from lateral radiographs in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 215-219.
22 Reif U, Probst CW. Comparison of tibial plateau angles in normal and cranial cruciate deficient stifles of Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 385-389.
23 Vedrine B, Guillemot A, Fontaine D. et al. Comparative anatomy of the proximal tibia in healthy Labrador Retrievers and Yorkshire Terriers. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 266-270.
24 Slocum B, Devine T. Cranial tibial thrust: A primary force in the canine stifle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1983; 183: 456-459.
25 Sathya S, Gilbert P, Shama A. et al. Effect of tibial levelling osteotomy on patellar tendon angle: a prospective clinical study. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 5: 346-350.
26 Guastella DB, Fox DB, Cook JL. Tibial plateau angle in four common breeds with cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and its relationship to meniscal tears. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 21: 125-128.
27 Hazenfield KM, Nylund A, Valdes-Martinez A. et al. Accuracy of a radiographic stitching technique to measure tibial plateau angle in large and giant breed dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 230-235.
28 Petazzoni M. TPLO in the small dog: 18 cases.. Proceedings of the 12th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress 2001. September 10-12 Munich, Germany: (abstr) 258
29 Vezzoni A. TPLO in small dogs.. Proceedings of World Veterinary Orthopaedics Congress 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: (abstr) 306
30 Inauen R, Koch D, Bass M. et al. Tibial tuberosity conformation as a risk factor for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 16-20.
31 Renwick AI, McKee WM, Emmerson TD. et al. Preliminary experiences of the triple tibial osteotomy procedure: tibial morphology and complications. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50: 212-221.
32 Unis MD, Johnson AL, Griffon DJ. et al. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver variability and repeatability of tibial plateau angle measurements with digital radiography using a novel digital radiographic program. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 187-194.
33 Mostafa AA, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Morphometric characteristics of the pelvic limbs of Labrador retrievers with and without cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Vet Res 2009; 70: 498-507.
34 Murphy S. Prospective comparison of tibial tuberosity advancement and TPLO.. Proceedings of the 17th European Society of Veterinary Orthopaedics and Traumatology Congress 2014. October 2-4 Venice, Italy: (abstr) 203-205.
35 Harasen G. Canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture in profile: 2002-2007. Can Vet J 2008; 49: 193-194.
36 Gordon-Evans WJ, Griffon DJ, Bubb C. et al. Comparison of lateral fabellar suture and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy techniques for treatment of dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013; 243: 675-680.
37 Fettig AA, Rand WM, Sato AF. et al. Observer variability of tibial plateau slope measurement in 40 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joints. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 471-478.