A comparative study of the efficacy of topical negative pressure moist dressings and conventional moist dressings in chronic wounds

ABSTRACT

Aim: To assess the efficacy of topical negative pressure moist wound dressing as compared to conventional moist wound dressings in improving the healing process in chronic wounds and to prove that negative pressure dressings can be used as a much better treatment option in the management of chronic wounds. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective comparative study of data from 112 patients with chronic wounds, of which 56 patients underwent topical negative pressure dressings (17 diabetic, 10 pressure sores, nine ischemic, two varicose, 10 post-infective raw areas and eight traumatic - six had bone exposed, two orthopaedic prosthesis exposed). The remaining 56 patients underwent conventional moist dressings (20 diabetic, two ischemic, 15 pressure sores, three varicose, eight post-infective raw areas and eight traumatic - five had bone exposed, three orthopaedic prosthesis exposed). The results were compared after 10 days. The variables compared were, rate of granulation tissue formation as a percentage of ulcer area covered, skin graft take up as the percentage of ulcer surface area and duration of hospital stay. The variables were compared using Unpaired Student′s t test. A " P" value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Out of 56 patients who underwent topical negative pressure dressings, six (10.71%) were failures, due to failure in maintaining topical negative pressure due to defective sealing technique; these were included into the study group. After 10 days, the mean rate of granulation tissue formation was 71.43% of ulcer surface area. All these 56 cases underwent split-thickness skin grafting. The mean graft take-up was 79.29%. The mean hospital stay was 32.64 days. In the remaining 56 patients, the mean rate of granulation tissue formation was 52.85% of ulcer surface area. The mean graft take-up was only 60.45% of the total ulcer surface area. The mean hospital stay was 60.45 days. Conclusion: To conclude, topical negative pressure dressings help in faster healing of chronic wounds and better graft take-up and reduce hospital stay of these patients.

KEY WORDS

hydrocolloid occlusive dressing - rate of granulation tissue formation - sub-atmospheric pressure - topical negative pressure moist wound dressing - vacuum-assisted closure

• 1 Madden JW. Textbook of surgery. The biological basis of modern surgical science. 11th ed. WB Saunders and Company; Philadelphia: 1977: p.271
• 2 [Last modified on 2001 Jun 8].[Last accessed on 2003 Dec 22] Available from http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2001/May/Thomas/Vacuum-Assisted-closure.html
• 3 Helling TS, Daon E. In Flanders fields: The Great War, Antoine Depage, and the resurgence of debridement. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 173-81
• 4 Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. Chronic wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 689-96
• 5 Atiyeh BS, el-Musa KA, Dham R. Scar quality and physiologic barrier function after moist and moist exposed dressings of partial thickness wounds. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 14-20
• 6 Williams C. 3M Tegasorb Thin: A hydrocolloid dressing for chronic wounds. Br J Nurs 2000; 9: 720-3
• 7 Fleischmann W, Strecker W, Bombelli M, Kinzl L. Vacuum sealing as treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures. Unfallchirurg 1993; 96: 488-92
• 8 Mullner T, Mrkonjic L, Kwasny O, Vecsei V. The use of negative pressure to promote the healing of tissue defects: A clinical trial using vacuum sealing technique. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 194-9
• 9 Argenta LC, Morykwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 563-77
• 10 Morykwas MJ, Faler BJ, Pearce DJ, Argenta LC. Effects of varying Levels of subatmospheric pressure on the rate of granulation tissue formation in experimental wounds in swine. Ann Plast Surg 2001; 47: 547-51
• 11 Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 553-62
• 12 Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC. Nonsurgical modalities to enhance healing and care of soft tissue wounds. J South Orthop Assoc 1997; 6: 279-88
• 13 Falanga V. Growth factors and chronic wounds: The need to understand the microenvironment. J Dermatol 1992; 19: 667-72
• 14 Fabian TS, Kaufman HJ, Lett ED, Thomas JB, Rawl DK, Lewis PL. etal. The evaluation of subatmospheric pressure and hyperbaric oxygen in ischemic full-thickness wound healing. Am Surg 2000; 66: 1136-43
• 15 Susan Mendez-Eastman. Advances in skin and wound care. J Prevention Healing 2001; 14: 314-25
• 16 Joseph J. A prospective randomized trial of vacuum assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic non-healing wounds. Wounds 2000; 12: 60-76
• 17 Eginton MT, Brown KR, Seabrook GR, Towne JB, Cambria RA. A prospective randomized evaluation of negative pressure wound dressings for diabetic foot wounds. Ann Vasc Surg 2003; 17: 645-9
• 18 Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H. Negative pressure dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers. J Dermatol 2003; 30: 299-305
• 19 Page JC, Nawswander B, Schwenke DC, Hansen M, Ferguson J. Retrospective analysis of negative pressure wound theraphy in open foot wounds with significant soft tissue defects. Adv Skin Wound Care 2004; 17: 354-64
• 20 Philbeck TE, Whittington KT, Milsap MH, Briones RB, Wright DG, Schroeder WJ. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999; 45: 41-50
• 21 Greer SE, Duthie E, Cartolano B, Koehler KM, Maydick-Youngberg D, Longaker MT. Techniques for applying subatmospheric dressing to wounds in difficult regions of anatomy. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1999; 26: 250-3
• 22 Singh A, Halder S, Menon GR, Chumber S, Misra MC, Sharma LK. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressings versus conventional gauze dressings in healing of chronic wounds. Asian J Surg 2004; 27: 326-32