Sonographic localization of nonpalpable testis: Tracking the cord technique

S Boopathy Vijayaraghavan

doi:10.4103/0971-3026.82298

Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2011; 21(02): 134-141
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.82298

Abdominal and Pelvic Radiology

Sonographic localization of nonpalpable testis: Tracking the cord technique

Authors

S Boopathy Vijayaraghavan

Sonoscan, Ultrasonic Scan Centre, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

PDF Download

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the value of USG as a diagnostic tool to locate nonpalpable testis (NPT), using a new technique of tracking the spermatic cord. Materials and Methods: This technique was used in 197 instances of NPT over a period of 7 years. The presence or absence of the cord in the inguinal canal was recorded. The visualized spermatic cord was tracked down to the testis in extra-abdominal location. If spermatic cord was not visualized, the USG was extended up to look for intra-abdominal testis. The location and size of the testis were recorded, and the findings were compared with those seen at surgery. Results: The status of NPT was predicted by sonography in 191 instances. The testis was canalicular in position in 53, abdominal in 76, ascending in 5, ectopic in 8, and moving in 5 cases. There were three instances of tumor in the NPT and one case of torsion. The testes were atrophic in 36 instances. The testis was not visualized by USG in 10 instances. In four of them, spermatic cord was seen in inguinal canal, indicating vanished testes. In one patient, there was an atrophic testis with inguinal hernia. Diagnostic laparoscopy was necessary in only five cases and showed abdominal testes in two cases and the cord entering the internal ring in three cases. There were one false-positive and four false-negative results with this technique. Conclusion: USG, with the tracking the cord technique, is a sensitive diagnostic tool in NPT. It is useful for selecting the ideal therapeutic surgical approach and helps avoid diagnostic laparoscopy in most of the patients.

Keywords

Nonpalpable testes - sonography - spermatic cord

PDF (2820 kb)

References

References
1 Salder TW. Longman′s Medical Embryology. 9 th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.
2 Elder JS. The undescended testis. Hormonal and surgical management. Surg Clin North Am 1988;68:983-1005.
3 MacKinnon AE. The undescended testis. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72:429-32.
4 Vijayaraghavan SB. Sonographic differential diagnosis of acute scrotum: Real-time whirlpool sign, a key sign of torsion. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:563-74.
5 Martin DC. Germinal cell tumors of the testis after orchiopexy. J Urol 1979;121:422-4.
6 Elder JS. Laparoscopy for impalpable testes: Significance of the patent processus vaginalis. J Urol 1994;152:776-8.
7 Pekkafali MZ, Sahin C, Ilbey YO, Albayrak S, Yildirim S, Basekim CC. Comparison of ultrasonographic and laparoscopic findings in adult nonpalpable testes cases. Eur Urol 2003;44:124-7.
8 Weiss RM, Carter AR, Rosenfield AT. High resolution real-time ultrasonography in the localization of the undescended testis. J Urol 1986;135:936-8.
9 Madrazo BL, Klugo RC, Parks JA, DiLoreto R. Ultrasonographic demonstration of undescended testes. Radiology 1979;133:181-3.
10 Wolverson MK, Houttuin E, Heiberg E, Sundaram M, Shields JB. Comparison of computed tomography with high-resolution real-time ultrasound in the localization of the impalpable undescended testis. Radiology 1983;146:133-6.
11 Rajfer J, Tauber A, Zinner N, Naftulin E, Worthen N. The use of computerized tomography scanning to localize the impalpable testis. J Urol 1983;129:972-4.
12 Hrebinko RL, Bellinger MF. The limited role of imaging techniques in managing children with undescended testes. J Urol 1993;150:458-60.
13 Riebel T, Gonnermann D, Willig RP. Spermatic venography in undescended testes. Pediatr Radiol 1987;17:39-44.
14 Gill B, Kogan S. Cryptorchidism. Current concepts. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997;44:1211-27.
15 Elder JS. Epididymal anomalies associated with hydrocele/hernia and cryptorchidism: Implications regarding testicular descent. J Urol 1992;148:624-6.
16 Maghnie M, Vanzulli A, Paesano P, Bragheri R, Palladini G, Preti P, et al. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography compared with surgical findings in the localization of the undescended testis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1994;148:699-703.
17 De Filippo RE, Barthold JS, Gonzalez R. The application of magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative localization of nonpalpable testis in obese children: An alternative to laparoscopy. J Urol 2000;164:154-5.
18 Dogra VS, Gottlieb RH, Oka M, Rubens DJ. Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology 2003;227:18-36.
19 Wolverson MK, Jagannadharao B, Sundaram M, Riaz MA, Nalesnik WJ, Houttuin E. CT in localization of impalpable cryptorchid testes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980;134:725-9.
20 Cain MP, Garra B, Gibbons MD. Scrotal-inguinal ultrasonography: A technique for identifying the nonpalpable inguinal testis without laparoscopy. J Urol 1996;156:791-4.
21 Dhaghighi MH. Assessment of diagnostic value of sonography for cryptorchidism. J Diagn Med Sonography 2006;22:42-7.
22 Nijs SM, Eijsbouts SW, Madern GC, Leyman PM, Lequin MH, Hazebroek FW. Nonpalpable testes: Is there a relationship between ultrasonographic and operative findings? Pediatr Radiol 2007;37:374-9.
23 Hutcheson JC, Snyder HM 3rd, Zuñiga ZV, Zderic SA, Schultz DJ, Canning DA, et al. Ectopic and undescended testes: 2 variants of a single congenital anomaly? J Urol 2000;163:961-3.
24 Rao PL, Gupta V, Kumar V. Anterior abdominal wall--An unusual site for ectopic testis. Pediatr Surg Int 2005;21:687-8.
25 Rusnack SL, Wu HY, Huff DS, Snyder HM 3rd, Zderic SA, Carr MC, et al. The ascending testis and the testis undescended since birth share the same histopathology. J Urol 2002;168:2590-1.