CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2017; 11(01): 117-121
DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_308_16
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Frequency of impacted teeth and categorization of impacted canines: A retrospective radiographic study using orthopantomograms

Hassan Al-Zoubi
1   Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah 41311, Saudi Arabia
,
Abdulgader Abdullatif Alharbi
2   Specialty Dental Center, King Fahad Hospital, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah 41311, Saudi Arabia
,
Donald J. Ferguson
3   Department of Orthodontics, European University College, Dubai 53382, UAE
,
Muhammad Sohail Zafar
4   Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Al Madinah, Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia
5   Visiting Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Islamic International Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the frequency of impacted maxillary canines using seven subtype classification system. For this purpose, impacted maxillary canines have been divided into seven various subtypes. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective study conducted using radiographic data of residents of Madinah, Al Munawwarah. Radiographic data of 14,000 patients, who attended College of Dentistry, Taibah University, from January 2011 to February 2015, were screened against the selection criteria for the presence of impacted teeth. The individuals with maxillary impacted canines were matched to maxillary canine impaction. The occurrence of each subtype of impacted canines was calculated. Results: Impacted teeth are more common in the maxilla compared to mandible. The impacted canine represented the highest proportion of all impacted maxillary teeth followed by the second premolars and the central incisors. According to the classification system represented, Type II of canine impaction comprised the highest proportion (51%) while Type IV (0.5%) comprised the lowest frequency. The maxillary canine is the most frequently impacted tooth followed by mandibular canines. Conclusions: Although there are many variations, the majority of impacted canines fall into Type II of the classification of impacted canines.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bass TB. Observations on the misplaced upper canine tooth. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1967; 18: 25-33
  • 2 Pedro FL, Bandéca MC, Volpato LE, Marques AT, Borba AM, Musis CR. et al. Prevalence of impacted teeth in a Brazilian subpopulation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15: 209-13
  • 3 Röhrer A. Displaced and impacted canines A radiographic research. Int J Orthod Oral Surg Radiogr 1929; 15: 1003-20
  • 4 Chung DD, Weisberg M, Pagala M. Incidence and effects of genetic factors on canine impaction in an isolated Jewish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: e331-5
  • 5 Sajnani AK, King NM. The sequential hypothesis of impaction of maxillary canine – A hypothesis based on clinical and radiographic findings. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40: e375-85
  • 6 Richardson G, Russell KA. A review of impacted permanent maxillary cuspids – Diagnosis and prevention. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 497-501
  • 7 Jung YH, Liang H, Benson BW, Flint DJ, Cho BH. The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 356-60
  • 8 Zafar MS, Alrahabi M. Cone beam computed tomography for exploring morphology of mandibular first molar. Br J Med Med Res 2015; 6: 514-21
  • 9 Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31: 426-30
  • 10 Lai CS, Bornstein MM, Mock L, Heuberger BM, Dietrich T, Katsaros C. Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: A radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 529-38
  • 11 Kau CH, Lee JJ, Souccar NM. The validation of a novel index assessing canine impactions. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 399-404
  • 12 Yamamoto G, Ohta Y, Tsuda Y, Tanaka A, Nishikawa M, Inoda H. A new classification of impacted canines and second premolars using orthopantomography. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 15: 31-7
  • 13 Shah RM, Boyd MA, Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals. II: Congenitally missing, supernumerary and peg teeth. Dent J 1978; 44: 265-8, 276
  • 14 Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of malocclusion in Swedish schoolchildren. Eur J Oral Sci 1973; 81: 12-20
  • 15 Delli K, Livas C, Bornstein MM. Lateral incisor agenesis, canine impaction and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a South European male population. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 278-83
  • 16 Rózsa N, Fábián G, Szádeczky B, Kaán M, Gábris K, Tarján I. Prevalence of impacted permanent upper canine and its treatment in 11-18-year-old orthodontic patients. Fogorv Sz 2003; 96: 65-9
  • 17 Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Investigation of transmigrated and impacted maxillary and mandibular canine teeth in an orthodontic patient population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 1001-6
  • 18 Zhong YL, Zeng XL, Jia QL, Zhang WL, Chen L. Clinical investigation of impacted maxillary canine. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006; 41: 483-5
  • 19 Andreasen JO, Peterson J, Laskin DM. Textbook and color atlas of tooth impactions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 354
  • 20 Archer WH. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia, USA: WB Saunders Company; 1975
  • 21 Ericson S, Kurol J. Incisor resorption caused by maxillary cuspids. A radiographic study. Angle Orthod 1987; 57: 332-46
  • 22 Becker A, Zilberman Y, Tsur B. Root length of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally-displaced maxillary cuspids. Angle Orthod 1984; 54: 218-25
  • 23 Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8: 133-40
  • 24 Hou R, Kong L, Ao J, Liu G, Zhou H, Qin R. et al. Investigation of impacted permanent teeth except the third molar in Chinese patients through an X-ray study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 762-7
  • 25 Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: A retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 32: 548-52
  • 26 Jacoby H. The etiology of maxillary canine impactions. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 125-32
  • 27 Takahama Y, Aiyama Y. Maxillary canine impaction as a possible microform of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4: 275-7
  • 28 Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous or missing lateral incisors: A population study. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8: 12-6
  • 29 Grover PS, Lorton L. The incidence of unerupted permanent teeth and related clinical cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59: 420-5
  • 30 Yavuz MS, Aras MH, Büyükkurt MC, Tozoglu S. Impacted mandibular canines. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 78-85
  • 31 Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 159-71
  • 32 Orton HS, Garvey MT, Pearson MH. Extrusion of the ectopic maxillary canine using a lower removable appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 349-59