Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.06.002
Letter to the Editor
Subject Editor:
Publication History
Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)
Sir,
The study by Robertson et al is a fine example of nonsensical, misleading statistics.[ 1 ] The authors demonstrate that, at certain time points after tonsillectomy, the Arnica-treated group experienced significantly less pain than the placebo group. Therefore, they draw an overall positive conclusion. If one uses their VAS data to draw a graph, one hardly needs a statistician to see that the pain experience in both groups did not relevantly differ ([Figure 1]). A statistician would have been useful, however, to adjust the results for major confounders: the marginal differences in favour of Arnica on three days may well have been caused by the high drop-out rate and/or the slightly higher intake of analgesics in the experimental group. Roberts et al conclude that “Arnica…provides a…significant decrease in pain…” I am not convinced!
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034926/200704/thumbnails/10-1016-j-homp-2007-06-002-3.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034926/200704/10-1016-j-homp-2007-06-002-1.jpg)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00034926/200704/10-1016-j-homp-2007-06-002-2.jpg)
-
Reference
- 1 Robertson A., Suryanarayanan R., Banerjee A. Homeopathic Amica montana for post-tonsillectomy analgesia: a randomised placebo control trial. Homp 2007; 96: 17-21.