Antimicrobial Essential Oil Combinations to Combat Foot Odour

Abstract

Foot odour (bromodosis) is an embarrassing and perplexing condition mostly caused by bacteria of the Brevibacterium species. Essential oils are a credible option as an affordable treatment of odour and contribute towards antimicrobial efficacy. Therefore, this study sets out to investigate the antimicrobial activity of essential oil combinations against odour-causing bacteria. The broth microdilution method was used to investigate the antimicrobial activity of 119 essential oil combinations, and the fractional inhibitory index was calculated to determine the interactive profile. Combinations that resulted in synergy in 1 : 1 ratios were further evaluated in different concentrations, and isobolograms were plotted to determine the influence of the ratio on overall activity. Numerous combinations could be identified as having synergistic interactions against the Brevibacterium spp. and no antagonism was observed. The combination of Juniperus virginiana (juniper) and Styrax benzoin (benzoin) demonstrated synergy against all three Brevibacterium spp. tested and J. virginiana was the essential oil responsible for the majority of the synergistic interactions. The results reported here confirm the promising potential of the majority of these oils and selected combinations in treating and controlling bromodosis.

Key words

aromatherapy - Brevibacterium spp. - bromodosis - malodour - interactions - essential oils - antimicrobial

Introduction

Foot odour (bromodosis) is a distressing disorder (both socially and medically) and is caused by the release of sulphur compounds generated by potent proteolytic enzymes produced by Brevibacterium [1], [2], [3], [4]. These bacteria are Gram-positive, catalase-positive, obligate aerobic bacilli.

There appears to be a constant concern with regards to body hygiene and malodour, making the use of agents such as fragrant deodorants and antiperspirants one of the largest cosmetic sellers globally [5], [6]. The global antiperspirant and deodorant market is estimated to be an industry worth US$72.7 billion (estimates for 2018) [7]. One of the most important personal care products is deodorant. It is a product that continues to retain constant investment by companies to improve quality, and formulations include aerosols, roll-ons, and gels [7]. Deodorants are applicable as a spray to body parts and the feet, whereas antiperspirants decrease sweat. Both are aimed at inhibiting the bacteria causing malodour.

The limitations of current available treatments are that they may be inconvenient, expensive, require extensive application, and are often disconcerting due to the reoccurrence of odour after ceasing treatment [8]. Furthermore, deodorants and antiperspirants may contain antimicrobial substances; however, with the amount of antimicrobial chemicals [such as propylene glycol, triclosan, benzalkonium chloride, and metal (e.g., aluminium) salts] being added to combat these bacteria, there is a constant concern of the toxicity and potential resistance to these ingredients [9], [10], [11].

By 2014, the antibiotic industry was estimated to be worth approximately US$65.5 billion [12]. The worth of the global antibiotic market is still on the rise, especially because of the high cost of developing new drugs or finding alternatives to the ever-growing antibiotic resistance issues. A contributor to the poor availability of resistant free antibiotics is the lack of newer antibiotics for the last two decades. Investment is aimed at either developing new antibiotics or identifying alternative antibiotic treatments. Alternatives would, in fact, be preferable if one considers the high costs involved in research and development (R&D), and the rate at which resistance is developing, which is faster than the rate at which new antibiotics can even be developed. This is evident by the fact that the net worth of the antibiotic industry is dominated by generic manufacturers and only a few new patented products [13].

The global fragrance market is predicted to be worth US$ 43.6 billion by 2021. Closely following the household product sector, the second largest market share for fragrance products is personal care, and one of the key elements in fragrances is essential oils [14]. Essential oils are frequently used in dermatology, and 5% of essential oils used in dermatology are recommended for body odour [15]. This is not surprising considering the pleasant fragrance imparted by these natural products. It is not only the pleasant organoleptic properties that render essential oils appealing in treating bromodosis, but also the antimicrobial activity displayed by these essential oils. Promising activity has been observed for essential oils against body odour-causing bacteria [16]. Essential oils are, however, predominantly used in combination, yet the recommended combinations as contained in the laymanʼs literature against foot malodour have yet to be investigated [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. No reports could be found reporting antimicrobial resistance against essential oil combinations.

Thus, with essential oils having potential antimicrobial activity, they are an attractive option for treating malodorous bacteria involved in bromodosis. To the R&D industry, the odour-inducing bacteria are not a priority, yet clearly by the predicted worth of the fragrance industry and the fact that personal care is the second largest contributor to this value, foot odour should be considered important. The natural origin of essential oils also makes them an appealing alternative to consumers.

This study is the first to investigate the antimicrobial activity of essential oil combinations against odour-inducing bacteria and aims to find the most promising oils to be used in combination.

Results

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 19 commercial essential oils, not previously investigated, are shown in [Table 1]. Brevibacterium agri and Brevibacterium epidermidis appeared to be the most susceptible to essential oil inhibition and were inhibited by 18 and 19 essential oils, respectively, at a noteworthy concentration (MIC ≤ 1.00 mg/mL). Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood) was found to display the strongest inhibitory activity (MIC values of 0.01 – 0.13 mg/mL).

Table 1 The mean MIC (n = 3) values of the individual essential oils investigated against Brevibacterium spp.

Essential oils	B. agri (ATCC 51663)	B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)	B. linens (DSM 20425)
* Noteworthy activity (bold)
Abies balsamea (balsam)	1.00*	0.50	1.00
Cinnamomum verum (cinnamon bark)	0.25	0.25	0.19
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon leaf)	0.25	0.25	0.50
Cistus ladanifer (rock rose) 1	1.00	0.25	1.00
Cistus ladanifer (rock rose) 2	0.38	0.38	1.00
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)	0.50	0.25	0.67
Foeniculum dulce (fennel)	1.00	0.25	1.00
Hypericum perforatum (St Johns wort)	2.00	1.00	2.00
Matricaria recutita (German chamomile)	0.25	0.38	0.50
Mentha spicata (spearmint)	0.50	0.50	2.00
Nardostachys jatamansi (spikenard)	1.00	0.75	3.00
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil aromatics) 1	0.50	0.50	1.00
Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil SE) 2	1.00	0.50	1.00
Origanum vulgare (oregano)	0.19	0.25	0.50
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	0.50	0.50	1.00
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1	0.25	0.25	0.50
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2	0.50	0.25	0.50
Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	0.01	0.13	0.13
Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 2	0.13	0.13	0.50
Control (Ciprofloxacin)	8.3 × 103 µg/mL	2.61 × 10 µg/mL	6.25 × 10 µg/mL

From the 119 combinations against each of the Brevibacterium spp., it can be observed ([Table 2]) that 118 combinations resulted in noteworthy antimicrobial activity against B. agri, 117 against B. epidermidis (most associated with odour), and 91 against Brevibacterium linens, proving the latter of the three as being the most resilient against antimicrobial inhibition. The combinations based on aromatherapeutic literature are shown as shaded areas. No antagonism was observed in any of the combinations.

Table 2 The mean MIC (n = 3) and ΣFIC values of the essential oil combinations investigated against odour-inducing bacteria.

Essential oil combinations		Mean MIC (mg/mL) (n = 3) and ΣFIC
		B. agri (ATCC 51663)				B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)				B. linens (DSM 20425)
Essential oil 1	Essential oil 2	MIC1*	MIC2*	MIC	ΣFIC	MIC1	MIC2	MIC	ΣFIC	MIC1	MIC2	MIC	ΣFIC
* Individual MIC values taken from [16]. § Noteworthy activity (bold). † Synergistic interaction (bold italics). ‡Combinations selected purely from the aromatherapeutic literature (shaded)
Achillea millefolium (yarrow)	Citrus sinensis (orange)	1.00	1.00	0.75§	0.75	1.00	0.75	0.50	0.58	1.50	1.00	2.00	1.67
Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)‡	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	0.25	2.00	1.00	2.25
	Boswellia carteri (frankincense)	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.25	0.75	0.75	2.00
	Juniperus virginiana (juniper)	0.50	2.00	1.00	1.25	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50†	0.25	1.00	0.75	1.88
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	0.50	1.00	0.75	1.13	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	0.25	1.00	1.00	2.50
	Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 1	0.50	0.05	0.19	2.06	1.00	0.19	0.19	0.59	0.25	0.19	0.23	1.04
	Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 2	0.50	0.13	0.19	0.91	1.00	0.13	0.19	0.81	0.25	0.50	0.75	2.25
Citrus aurantium var. amara leaf (petitgrain)	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	3.00	3.00
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.17	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	2.00	2.00	1.25	0.63
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	2.25	2.00	1.00	3.00	2.25
Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)	Citrus aurantifolia (lime)	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.75	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91
	Allium sativum (garlic)	1.00	0.13	0.13	0.54	0.25	0.75	0.25	0.67	0.38	0.50	0.75	1.74
Coriandrum sativum (coriander)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	3.00	2.00	1.00	0.42
	Piper nigrum (black pepper)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	0.50	0.38	0.50	1.16	3.00	2.00	2.00	0.83
	Salvia sclarea (clary sage)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	3.00	1.00	2.00	1.33
	Syzygium aromaticum (clove)	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.13	0.50	0.38	0.50	1.16	3.00	0.50	1.00	1.17
	Boswellia carteri (frankincense)	1.00	1.00	0.60	0.60	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	3.00	0.75	1.00	0.83
	Zingiber officinale (ginger)	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	3.00	1.00	2.00	1.33
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	1.00	0.31	0.30	0.63	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.75	3.00	0.25	0.50	1.08
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	1.00	0.01	0.07	3.54	0.50	0.13	0.13	0.61	3.00	0.13	0.50	2.01
Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)	Salvia sclarea (clary sage)	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.17	0.50	1.00	1.50	2.25	2.00	1.00	1.50	1.13
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.17	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	2.00	1.00	1.00	0.75
	Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)	0.75	0.38	0.13	0.26	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.75	2.00	0.38	0.50	0.78
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.58	0.50	0.75	0.50	0.83	2.00	1.00	2.00	1.50
Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass)	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.25	1.00	0.50	1.25	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	0.25	1.00	0.50	1.25	0.50	1.00	0.38	0.56	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	0.25	0.50	0.50	1.50	0.67	2.00	1.67	1.66
	Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	0.50	0.38	0.75	1.74	0.25	0.50	0.50	1.50	0.67	1.00	1.50	1.87
	Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.75	0.67	1.00	1.00	1.25
Foeniculum dulce (fennel)	Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	1.00	0.38	1.00	1.82	0.25	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	0.25	0.50	0.50	1.50	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	1.00	0.31	0.75	1.58	0.25	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.25	1.00	2.50
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	1.00	0.01	0.08	3.84	0.25	0.13	0.13	0.73	1.00	0.13	0.75	3.26
	Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1	1.00	0.25	0.50	1.25	0.25	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50
	Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2	1.00	0.50	0.38	0.56	0.25	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50
Juniperus virginiana (juniper)	Styrax benzoin (benzoin)	2.00	0.50	0.13	0.16	1.00	0.50	0.25	0.38	1.00	0.75	0.42	0.49
	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	2.00	0.75	0.56
	Salvia sclarea (clary sage)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Cupressus sempervirens (cypress)	2.00	0.75	0.75	0.69	1.00	0.50	0.38	0.56	1.00	2.00	0.50	0.38
	Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.91	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	2.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Citrus limon (lemon)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	0.50	0.38	0.56	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Citrus aurantifolia (lime)	2.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.25	0.38	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Citrus reticulata (mandarin)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	1.50	0.63	0.52	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	2.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.75	0.50	0.58	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Pinus sylvestris (pine)	2.00	1.00	0.75	0.56	1.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	2.00	2.00
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	2.00	1.00	1.50	1.13	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	2.00	0.31	0.31	0.58	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.63	1.00	0.25	0.50	1.25
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	2.00	0.01	0.06	3.14	1.00	0.13	0.13	0.54	1.00	0.13	0.75	3.26
Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	Anthemis nobilis (chamomile)	1.00	1.50	1.00	0.83	1.00	2.00	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Matricaria recutita (German chamomile)	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.63	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.91	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75
	Citrus limon (lemon)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus reticulata (mandarin)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.50	0.50	0.42	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.50	0.58	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli)	1.00	0.09	0.19	1.14	1.00	0.50	0.63	0.94	1.00	0.75	0.50	0.58
Leptospermum scoparium (manuka)	Citrus aurantifolia (lime)	0.38	1.00	1.00	1.82	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
	Allium sativum (garlic)	0.38	0.13	0.13	0.65	1.00	0.75	0.50	0.58	0.50	0.50	1.00	2.00
Litsea cubeba (may chang)	Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	0.13	0.38	0.25	1.29	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.13	1.00	0.25	1.09	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
	Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)	0.13	0.50	0.19	0.91	1.00	1.00	0.55	0.55	0.50	1.00	1.50	2.25
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	0.13	1.00	0.22	0.95	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.17	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
	Citrus aurantium var. amara leaf (petitgrain)	0.13	1.00	0.50	2.17	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	0.50	1.00	2.00	3.00
	Cananga odorata (ylang ylang)	0.13	0.50	0.25	1.21	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.30	0.45
	Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	0.13	0.50	0.25	1.21	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75
	Ocimum basilicum (basil)	0.13	1.25	0.25	1.06	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	0.50	1.00	0.65	0.98
	Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil aromatics) 1	0.13	0.50	0.25	1.21	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75
	Ocimum tenuiflorum (holy basil SE) 2	0.13	1.00	0.25	1.09	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75
Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.83	1.00	2.00	1.50	1.13
	Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)	0.50	1.00	0.75	1.13	0.50	0.38	0.25	0.58	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Juniperus virginiana (juniper)	0.50	2.00	1.00	1.25	0.50	1.00	0.42	0.63	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.25	0.38	1.00	1.00	0.83	0.83
	Citrus limon (lemon)	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)	0.50	0.50	1.00	2.00	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	0.50	1.00	0.42	0.63	0.50	0.75	0.42	0.69	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.42	0.63	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	0.50	0.31	0.31	0.81	0.50	0.25	0.13	0.38	1.00	0.25	0.25	0.63
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	0.50	0.01	0.08	3.88	0.50	0.13	0.25	1.21	1.00	0.13	0.75	3.26
	Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.25	0.50	1.50	1.00	0.67	0.50	0.62
Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	0.38	1.00	1.00	1.82	0.50	0.50	0.42	0.83	1.00	2.00	1.00	0.75
	Citrus limon (lemon)	0.38	1.00	1.00	1.82	0.50	0.50	0.25	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.50	0.38	0.42	0.96	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.50	1.00	0.25	0.38	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Juniperus virginiana (juniper)	0.38	2.00	0.50	0.78	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli)	0.38	0.50	0.50	1.16	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus sinensis (orange)	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.50	0.75	0.42	0.69	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.50	1.00	0.42	0.63	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	0.38	0.31	0.25	0.73	0.50	0.25	0.19	0.56	1.00	0.25	0.50	1.25
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	0.38	0.01	< 0.01	0.46	0.50	0.13	0.25	1.21	1.00	0.13	0.50	2.17
	Cymbopogon nardus (citronella)	0.38	0.50	0.50	1.16	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.75	1.00	0.67	1.00	1.25
Pinus sylvestris (pine)	Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.25	0.75	1.88
	Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus)	1.00	0.50	0.38	0.56	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	1.00	1.00	0.78	0.78	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.50	1.00	1.50	1.00	0.83
Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli)	Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	0.09	0.50	0.33	2.19	0.50	0.50	0.13	0.26	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.58
	Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)	0.09	0.50	0.25	1.64	0.50	1.00	0.38	0.56	0.75	0.25	0.50	1.33
	Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	0.09	0.38	0.25	1.72	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.58
	Commiphora myrrha (myrrh)	0.09	0.38	0.25	1.72	0.50	0.25	0.25	0.75	0.75	2.00	0.38	0.35
	Santalum album (sandalwood)	0.09	0.31	0.13	0.90	0.50	0.25	0.22	0.66	0.75	0.25	0.38	1.00
	Santalum austrocaledonicum (sandalwood)	0.09	0.01	0.05	2.89	0.50	0.13	0.13	0.61	0.75	0.13	0.25	1.13
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1	Citrus reticulata (mandarin)	0.25	1.00	0.50	1.25	0.25	1.50	0.38	0.88	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
Rosa damascena (rose otto) 2	Citrus reticulata (mandarin)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.25	1.50	0.25	0.58	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.50
Salvia sclarea (clary sage)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.13	1.00	2.00	1.50	1.13
	Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood)	1.00	0.50	0.45	0.68	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.25	0.75	1.88
	Boswellia carteri (frankincense)	1.00	1.00	0.25	0.25	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	0.75	1.00	1.17
	Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium)	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.91	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium)	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus paradisi (grapefruit)	1.00	1.00	0.69	0.69	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.91	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
	Citrus aurantifolia (lime)	1.00	1.00	0.63	0.63	1.00	0.50	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
	Citrus reticulata (mandarin)	1.00	1.00	0.75	0.75	1.00	1.50	0.88	0.73	1.00	1.00	1.50	1.50
Syzygium aromaticum (clove)	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.38	0.50	0.50	1.16	0.50	2.00	0.50	0.63
	Citrus limon (lemon)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.38	0.50	0.50	1.16	0.50	1.00	0.67	1.00
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.38	1.00	0.50	0.91	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75
Thymus vulgaris (thyme)	Citrus limon (lemon)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.67	0.67
	Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.58	0.58
	Citrus bergamia (bergamot)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00	2.00	0.83	0.63
	Pinus sylvestris (pine)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	1.00	1.00	0.67	0.67
	Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary)	0.50	1.00	0.50	0.75	0.50	1.00	0.67	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.83	0.83

B. agri had four synergistic, 68 additive, and 47 indifferent interactions and B. epidermidis had 12 synergistic, 85 additive, and 22 indifferent interactions. B. linens had six synergistic, 52 additive, and 61 indifferent interactions.

The synergistic combination with the lowest MIC value of 9.00 µg/mL against B. agri was when Pelargonium odoratissimum (geranium) was combined with S. austrocaledonicum. The most effective synergistic combination against B. epidermidis was Pelargonium graveolens (rose geranium) with Santalum album (sandalwood) (MIC = 0.13 mg/mL) and against B. linens, it was Litsea cubeba (may chang) with Cananga odorata (ylang ylang) (MIC = 0.30 mg/mL).

The combination of Cedrus atlantica (cedarwood) with Vetiveria zizanioides (vetiver) 1 (MIC values ranging 0.19 – 0.23 mg/mL) and the combination of Pogostemon patchouli (patchouli) and S. austrocaledonicum (MIC values ranging 0.05 – 0.25 mg/mL) displayed the overall strongest inhibition against all three Brevibacterium spp. Four additional combinations could also be noted for strong inhibition against two of the Brevibacterium spp. and noteworthy activity against a third. These include C. atlantica with V. zizanioides 2, Coriandrum sativum (coriander) with S. austrocaledonicum, Foeniculum dulce (fennel) with S. austrocaledonicum, and Juniperus virginiana (juniper) with S. austrocaledonicum.

The combination of J. virginiana and Styrax benzoin (benzoin) displayed synergy against each of the three Brevibacterium spp., with noteworthy MIC values ranging from 0.13 – 0.42 mg/mL and fractional inhibitory concentration index (ΣFIC) values from 0.16 – 0.49. This is encouraging considering the pleasant organoleptic property offered by this combination.

The varied ratio combinations were further evaluated and plotted on isobolograms. These are shown in [Figs. 1]–[4] with corresponding tables ([Tables 3]–[6]) that indicate the MIC at the different ratios.

Fig. 1 Isobologram representation of essential oils in combination against B. agri (ATCC 51663). ● [brown] C. sempervirens, ⋆ C. myrrha, ♦ P. odoratissimum, ▮ S. austrocaledonicum, ● [orange] S. sclarea, and ○ B. carteri in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 3]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.

Table 3 The concentrations of essential oils associated to the volume ratios studied against B. agri (ATCC 51663).

Plot number*	Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2	Concentrations of essential oils in combination
		C. sempervirens and C. myrrha	P. odoratissimum and S. austrocaledonicum	S. sclarea and B. carteri
	µL	mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1	90 : 10	0.50	0.38	0.75
2	80 : 20	0.38	0.19	0.50
3	70 : 30	0.19	0.09	0.50
4	60 : 40	0.19	0.05	0.25
5	50 : 50	0.13	0.03	0.25
6	40 : 60	0.13	0.03	0.25
7	30 : 70	0.13	0.05	0.25
8	20 : 80	0.19	0.06	0.38
9	10 : 90	0.25	0.06	0.38

[Fig. 1] shows that the combinations of Cupressus sempervirens with Commiphora myrrha (myrrh), P. odoratissimum with S. austrocaledonicum, and Salvia sclarea (clary sage) with Boswellia carteri (frankincense) against B. agri. The combination of P. odoratissimum and S. austrocaledonicum predominantly requires S. austrocaledonicum to be in a higher concentration. Synergy was observed for combinations closest to and including 1 : 1 ratios. These isobolograms demonstrate how important it is to mix the essential oils in the appropriate ratios, as varied ratios can change the interaction considerably. [Table 3] displays the MIC values of each ratio that corresponds to the combinations shown in [Fig. 1].

[Fig. 2] (corresponds to [Table 4]) shows J. virginiana and S. benzoin essential oils in combination against the three Brevibacterium spp. It can also be observed that synergy results where the combination is closest to the 1 : 1 ratio. S. benzoin, however, is a strong common denominator for synergy, as points 5 – 7 and even point 8 (B. linens) where S. benzoin is in the higher ratio, synergy is demonstrated. Point 9, however, is consistently an outlier against each Brevibacterium. These combinations (ratio mixes 6 : 4, 5 : 5, 4 : 6, and 3 : 7) should be strongly considered for further formulation studies, especially as a neutral (men and women) deodorant due to the earthly woody and vanilla smell offered by this combination.

Fig. 2 Isobologram representation of J. virginiana and S. benzoin essential oils in combination against the three Brevibacterium spp. ▲ J. virginiana and ▼ S. benzoin in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 4]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.

Table 4 The concentrations of the essential oil combination of J. virginiana and S. benzoin against all three Brevibacterium spp.

Plot number*	Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2	Concentrations of essential oils in combination
		J. virginiana and S. benzoin
		B. agri (ATCC 51663)	B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)	B. linens (DSM 20425)
	µL	mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1	90 : 10	0.50	0.75	1.50
2	80 : 20	0.38	0.75	1.00
3	70 : 30	0.38	0.50	1.00
4	60 : 40	0.13	0.50	1.00
5	50 : 50	0.13	0.50	1.00
6	40 : 60	0.13	0.50	1.00
7	30 : 70	0.13	0.50	1.00
8	20 : 80	0.31	0.75	1.00
9	10 : 90	0.50	1.00	1.50

In [Fig. 3], it can be observed that all but one of the synergistic interactions against B. epidermidis containing the Pelargonium spp. is due to this oil (regardless of chemotype) being in the majority. Interestingly, both Pelargonium spp. in combination with Lavandula angustifolia (lavender) reflect similar patterns where points 3 – 7 are synergistic. [Table 5] corresponds to the combinations shown in [Fig. 3].

Fig. 3 Isobologram representations of essential oils in combination containing Pelargonium spp. against B. epidermidis (DSM 20660). ♦ [red] Pelargonium spp., ▮ S. album, ♦ [purple] L. angustifolia, ● C. limon, and ▲ P. patchouli in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 5]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.

Table 5 The concentrations of essential oil combinations involving the Pelargonium spp. against B. epidermidis (DSM 20660).

Plot number*	Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2	Concentrations of essential oils in combination
		P. patchouli and P. graveolens	P. graveolens and S. album	P. graveolens and L. angustifolia	P. odoratissimum and L. angustifolia	P. odoratissimum and C. limon
	µL	mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1	90 : 10	0.38	0.25	0.50	0.50	0.50
2	80 : 20	0.25	0.25	0.50	0.38	0.25
3	70 : 30	0.19	0.19	0.25	0.25	0.25
4	60 : 40	0.13	0.19	0.25	0.25	0.25
5	50 : 50	0.13	0.19	0.25	0.25	0.25
6	40 : 60	0.13	0.19	0.38	0.25	0.25
7	30 : 70	0.13	0.25	0.50	0.50	0.50
8	20 : 80	0.13	0.25	0.75	0.75	1.00
9	10 : 90	0.25	0.25	1.00	1.00	1.50

[Fig. 4] (MIC of ratios shown in [Table 6]) displays J. virginiana in combination with different essential oils against B. epidermidis and B. linens, and in five of the six combinations, J. virginiana being used in the majority is shown to be responsible for the synergy.

Fig. 4 Isobologram representations of J. virginiana and essential oils in combination against the three B. epidermidis and B. linens. ▲ J. virginiana, ● [light brown] P. sylvestris, ● [red] R. officinali, ♦ L. angustifolia, ▮ C. atlantica, ● [orange] C. paradise, and ● [dark brown] C. sempervirens in majority volume. * Equal volume of each essential oil. Points 1 – 9 ([Table 6]) provide exact concentrations of the essential oils.

Table 6 The concentrations of essential oil combinations involving J. virginiana against B. epidermidis and B. linens.

Plot number*	Volume ratio of essential oil 1: essential oil 2	Concentrations of essential oils in combination
		B. epidermidis (DSM 20660)				B. linens (DSM 20425)
		J. virginiana and R. officinalis	J. virginiana and P. sylvestris	J. virginiana and L. angustifolia	J. virginiana and C. atlantica	J. virginiana and C. paradisi	J. virginiana and C. sempervirens
	µL	mg/mL
* Refers to points on the isobologram graphs
1	90 : 10	1.00	0.25	0.50	0.50	1.00	1.00
2	80 : 20	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.75	0.50
3	70 : 30	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.50
4	60 : 40	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.50
5	50 : 50	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.25	0.50	0.50
6	40 : 60	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.50
7	30 : 70	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.38	0.50	0.50
8	20 : 80	0.50	0.50	1.00	0.38	0.75	0.50
9	10 : 90	1.00	0.50	1.00	0.50	1.00	1.00

Discussion

The antimicrobial activity of the majority of the essential oils have been previously reported against the three Brevibacterium species [16]. A selection of oils ([Table 1]) not previously studied have been added for a concise overview of antimicrobial activity. S. austrocaledonicum displayed stronger antimicrobial activity against odour bacteria than S. album (0.25 – 0.31 mg/mL), possibly due to the higher α-santalol content [16]. P. odoratissimum (geranium) and P. graveolens (rose geranium) from this study were similar in activity [16]. Cinnamomum zeylanicum showed stronger antimicrobial inhibition against B. agri and B. epidermidis (0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL) compared to a previous study (0.50 – 1.50 mg/mL) [16], most likely due to the higher concentration of eugenol. Cinnamomum verum, containing cinnamaldehyde, allowed for a much higher antimicrobial activity to both of the C. zeylanicum samples (0.19 – 0.25 mg/mL compared to 0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL). The V. zizanioides (vetiver) sample in this study is comparable to the sample used by Orchard et al. [16]. Matricaria recutita (German chamomile) was shown to be the superior of the tested chamomile species with MIC values of 0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL compared to that of Anthemis nobilis (Roman chamomile) (MIC 1.00 – 2.00 mg/mL) [16]. The two Rosa damascena (Rose otto) samples predominantly displayed equal inhibitory potential (0.25 – 0.50 mg/mL). This shows a potential for this oil, not only because of the antimicrobial activity, but also due to the additional pleasant organoleptic properties.

The high antimicrobial activities in combination together with the synergistic interactions are encouraging findings considering that, although previously believed to be apathogenic, Brevibacterium spp. have been reported as being involved in opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. The essential oils occuring most frequently in the most noteworthy combinations across all the Brevibacterium were the Santalum spp., P. patchouli, and Pelargonium spp. Importantly, these are also essential oils used in the fragrance industry.

A quick search of the top ten perfumes of America (2017) [35] include a number of ingredients of essential oil origin. If one were to identify the most popular essential oils within these fragrances, patchouli and rose spp. are in six of the perfumes. Ylang ylang, mandarin, and bergamot are in three, vetiver and orange are in two, and geranium, lemongrass, lime, neroli, and sandalwood are also present. What is encouraging to note is that the majority of these oils that were used in the combinations investigated in this study displayed noteworthy antimicrobial activity against the malodourous bacteria, and six [Pelargonium spp., P. patchouli, Citrus bergamia (bergamot), C. odorata, Santalum spp., and Citrus aurantifolia (lime)] were involved in synergistic interactions. The essential oils chosen by the perfume industry were selected for their organoleptic properties. Success of these essential oils is evident by the popularity and the ever-increasing value in the industry. The antimicrobial activity displayed in this study highlights these fragrant essential oils as options for treating malodour.

The essential oil found to predominantly contribute towards synergy was J. virginiana, as it was observed in 8 out of the 20 synergistic interactions. This is also an essential oil recommended for body odour [17], [18], [19], [21], [22], [25], [26], [27], [28]. In addition, two essential oils that are also recommended for odour (Pelargonium spp. and L. angustifolia) were also observed in several synergistic interactions. A previous study was also able to report on several synergistic essential oil interactions in combination with L. angustifolia, although it didnʼt investigate activity against odour-inducing bacteria [36].

The most frequently recommended combination for bromodosis was C. sempervirens (cypress) with L. angustifolia [19]. This combination displayed noteworthy antimicrobial activity against each of the Brevibacterium spp. (MIC 1.00 mg/mL). Interestingly, the majority of the combinations that demonstrated synergy were those selected based on the noteworthy antimicrobial activity, and not those combinations recommended in the laymanʼs aromatherapeutic literature.

No chemotype or variation in the plant species tested offered superior antimicrobial activity when tested in combination against the different Brevibacterium species. This is reassuring as the design of fragrant deodorants may not necessarily be limited to one chemotype. What is important, however, is that the results herein reported be considered when selecting ingredients to formulate blends for treating malodour. Besides the offered organoleptic properties, the selection should be based on combinations that inhibit all three of the Brevibacterium species. There is rarely one bacterium present on the skin, thus antimicrobial activity targeting all bacteria implicated in odour is desirable.

This is the first investigation to study the influence of the ratios against Brevibacterium spp. The dual action offered by essential oils regarding their array of pleasant fragrance and noteworthy antimicrobial activity highlights some of these combinations as credible options for the fragrant treatment of foot odour. Several combinations (such as C. atlantica with V. zizanioides, P. patchouli with S. austrocaledonicum and J. virginiana with S. benzoin) could be highlighted for not only use against bromodosis, but also as potential combinations for developing formulations. This study provides scientific evidence for the use of selected essential oil combinations for the treatment of bromodosis and provides convincing preliminary data for their use in products promoting personal hygiene.

Materials and Methods

Essential oil procurement and quality confirmation

The essential oils (56 in total) were selected and obtained from international flavour and fragrance industries such as Givaudan (Dübendorf, Switzerland), Robertet (Grasse, France) Burgess and Finch, PranaMonde, Essentia, Scatters Oils (Gauteng, South Africa), Aromatics International, and Subtle Energies (Ayurveda aromatherapy). Additional chemotypes and samples were included ([Table 1]) in addition to the essential oils reported previously [16] to determine the consistency in results from different fragrance companies and the influence of the differences in major compound concentration. These are indicated with numbers, e.g., Rosa damascena (rose otto) 1 and R. damascena (rose otto) 2. The chemical compositions of the test essential oils have all previously been characterised [16], [37].

Combination selection

The selection of 119 essential oil combinations was made firstly based on the frequency of citation in the aromatherapeutic literature in treating treating body odour [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Also included were essential oils where noteworthy activity was previously reported against Brevibacterium spp. [16] and essential oils that were found by the researchers to exhibit a pleasant fragrance, as these may add to the organoleptic selection for future formulation possibilities.

Preparation of cultures

The microorganisms used in this study were from ATCC and Deutsche Sammlung von Mikrooganismen (DSM) strains. B. agri and B. epidermidis were grown in Tryptone Soya broth (TSB) (Oxoid) for 18 to 24 h at 37 °C and B. linens was grown in TSB and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days. All three Brevibacterium spp. were streaked onto Tryptone Soya agar (TSA) (Oxoid) plates and incubated accordingly to confirm purity. A waiver for the use of these microorganisms was granted by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference W-CJ-131026-3).

Minimum inhibitory concentration

The selected essential oil combinations were tested in 1 : 1 ratios using the broth microdilution assay [37], where the total volume of 100 µL was comprised of 50 µL of each essential oil used (Essential oil 1: Essential oil 2). Ciprofloxacin (purity ≥ 98.0%, Sigma-Aldrich), at a concentration of 0.01 mg/mL, was included as a positive control to ensure microbial susceptibility, and 32.00 mg/mL water in acetone was used as a negative control to determine the antimicrobial effects of the solvents. A volume of 100 µL of an approximate inoculum concentration of 1 × 10⁶ colony forming units per mL (CFU/mL) of the tested microorganisms was added to each well.

After the respective incubation periods, microtiter wells received 40 µL of 0.04% w/v p-iodonitrotetrazolium violet solution (INT) (Sigma-Aldrich), and the MIC was evaluated as the lowest concentration displaying no colour change. MIC values ≤ 1.00 mg/mL were considered noteworthy [15], [16]. The individual and combined values were recorded and the ΣFIC was calculated.

The ΣFIC was calculated according to the following equations [38]:

* Where (a) is the MIC of the first essential oil in the combination and (b) is the MIC of the second essential oil.

The FIC index was calculated to the sum ΣFIC = FIC (i) + FIC (ii). The ΣFIC for each essential oil combination was interpreted as follows: ≤ 0.5 indicates synergy, > 0.5 – 1.0 is additive, > 1.0 – ≤ 4.0 indicates indifference, and > 4.0 indicates antagonism [38].

Varied ratio combinations

Combinations that resulted in synergistic interactions were further evaluated at various ratio combinations according to the described MIC assay; however, the oils were placed in different ratios of 9 : 1, 8 : 2, 7 : 3, 6 : 4, 5 : 5, 4 : 6, 3 : 7, 2 : 8, and 1 : 9. The subsequent MICs of the different ratios were then captured and recorded on an isobologram using GraphPad Prism (Version 5) software and the ratio points were expressed graphically. This allowed for a graphical representation of the overall interactive influence of each essential oil in combination [38]. Synergy was displayed where the data points fell beneath or on the 0.5 : 0.5 line. Ratio points in the area above the 0.5 : 0.5 line and below and inclusive of the 1 : 1 line represent additive interactions. For data points above the 1 : 1 line and below and inclusive of the 4 : 4 line, noninteractive effects were observed. Points above the 4 : 4 line would indicate antagonism [38].

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Scatters Oils (South Africa), Aromatics International, and Subtle Energies (Ayurveda aromatherapy) for the donation of several of the oils. We thank The National Research Foundation and the University of the Witwatersrand Financial Research Committee for financial support.

• References

• 1 Association AP. Foot odour. Available at http://www.podiatryvic.com.au/Public/Facts4.htm Accessed March 23, 2013
• 2 Gruner E, Pfyffer GE, von Graevenitz A. Characterization of Brevibacterium spp. from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 1408-1412
• 3 Dixon B. Cheese, toes and mosquitoes. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1105
• 4 Wilson M. Microbial Inhabitants of Humans, their Ecology and Role in Health and Disease. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005
• 5 Laden K. Antiperspirants and Deodorants: History of major HBA Market. In: Laden K. ed. Antiperspirants and Deodorants. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1999: 1-15
• 6 Kanlayavattanakul M, Lourith N. Therapeutic agents and herbs in topical application for acne treatment. Int J Cosmet Sci 2011; 33: 289-297
• 7 Statista. Size of the global antiperspirant and deodorant market from 2012 to 2023 (in billion U.S. dollars). Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/254668/size-of-the-global-antiperspirant-and-deodorant-market/ Accessed June 29, 2017
• 8 Semkova K, Gergovska M, Kazandjieva J, Tsankov N. Hyperhidrosis, bromhidrosis, and chromhidrosis: Fold (intertriginous) dermatoses. Clin Dermatol 2015; 33: 483-491
• 9 Exley C. Does antiperspirant use increase the risk of aluminium-related disease, including Alzheimerʼs disease?. Mol Med Today 1998; 4: 107-109
• 10 Darbre PD, Pugazhendhi D, Mannello F. Aluminium and human breast diseases. J Inorg Biochem 2011; 105: 1484-1488
• 11 Bhargava H, Leonard PA. Triclosan: applications and safety. Am J Infect Control 1996; 24: 209-218
• 12 Mass W. Global market for antibiotic resistance and antibiotic technologies to be worth $65.5 billion in 2014. Available at http://www.bccresearch.com Accessed July 17, 2017
• 13 Grandviewresearch. Antibiotics market analysis by drug class (cephalosporins, penicillins, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, sulfonamides), by mechanism of action (cell wall synthesis inhibitors, protein synthesis inhibitors, DNA synthesis inhibitors, rna synthesis inhibitors, mycolic acid inhibitors, folic acid synthesis inhibitors), and segment forecasts to 2024. Available at http://www.grandviewresearch.com Accessed July 17, 2017
• 14 Statista. Size of the global fragrance market from 2012 to 2021 (in billion U.S. dollars). Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/259221/global-fragrance-market-size/ Accessed July 17, 2017
• 15 Orchard A, van Vuuren SF. Commercial essential oils as potential antimicrobials to treat skin diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2017; 2017: 4517971
• 16 Orchard A, Sandasi M, Kamatou GPP, Viljoen A, van Vuuren S. The in vitro antimicrobial activity and chemometric modelling of 59 commercial essential oils against pathogens of dermatological relevance. Chem Biodivers 2017; 14: e1600218 doi:10.1002/cbdv.201600218
• 17 Sellar W. The Directory of essential Oils. London: C. W. Daniel Company Ltd.; 1992
• 18 Lawless J. The illustrated Encyclopedia of essential Oils: the complete Guide to the Use of Oils in Aromatherapy and Herbalism. Massachusetts: Element books; 1995
• 19 Curtis S. Essential Oils. London, UK: Aurum Press; 1996
• 20 Harding J. A Guide to essential Oils. Bath, UK: Parragon; 2002
• 21 Creative A. Just Aromatherapy. Valencia, CA: Top That! Publishing Inc.; 2005
• 22 Clarke S. Essential Chemistry for Aromatherapy. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2008
• 23 Harding J. The essential Oils Handbook. London, UK: Duncan Baird Publishers Ltd.; 2008
• 24 Evans M. Natural Healing: Remedies & Therapies. London, UK: Hermes House; 2010
• 25 Farrer-Halls G. The Aromatherapy Bible: the definitive Guide to using essential Oils. London, UK: Bounty Books; 2011
• 26 Kovac M. A quick Guide to essential Oils. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Aromadelavnice s.p.; 2011
• 27 Meadowbank. Ailments leaflet – find an essential oil for your ailment. 2012.
• 28 Burgess and Finch. Burgess and Finch aromatherapy: patient leaflet. 2013.
• 29 Manetos CM, Pavlidis AN, Kallistratos MS, Tsoukas AS, Chamodraka ES, Levantakis I, Manolis AJ. Native aortic valve endocarditis caused by Brevibacterium epidermidis in an immunocompetent patient. Am J Med Sci 2011; 342: 257-258
• 30 Gruner E, Steigerwalt AG, Hollis DG, Weyant RS, Weaver RE, Moss CW, Daneshvar M, Brown JM, Brenner DJ. Human infections caused by Brevibacterium casei, formerly CDC groups B-1 and B-3. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 1511-1518
• 31 Dass KN, Smith MA, Gill VJ, Goldstein SA, Lucey DR. Brevibacterium endocarditis: a first report. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: e20-e21
• 32 Beukinga I, Rodriguez-Villalobos H, Deplano A, Jacobs F, Struelens M. Management of long-term catheter-related Brevibacterium bacteraemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004; 10: 465-467
• 33 Kumar VA, Augustine D, Panikar D, Nandakumar A, Dinesh KR, Karim S, Philip R. Brevibacterium casei as a cause of brain abscess in an immunocompetent patient. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 4374-4376
• 34 Talento AF, Malnick H, Cotter M, Brady A, McGowan D, Smyth E, Fitzpatrick F. Brevibacterium otitidis: an elusive cause of neurosurgical infection. J Med Microbiol 2013; 62: 486-488
• 35 Topteny. Top 10 Americaʼs Best-Selling Perfumes. Available at http://www.topteny.com/top-10-americas-best-selling-perfumes/ Accessed July 12, 2017
• 36 de Rapper S, Kamatou G, Viljoen A, van Vuuren S. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of Lavandula angustifolia essential oil in combination with other aroma-therapeutic oils. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013; 2013: 852049
• 37 Orchard A, van Vuuren SF, Kamatou GPP, Viljoen A. The in vitro antimicrobial analysis of commercial essential oil combinations against acne pathogens. Int J Cosmet Sci 2018;
• 38 van Vuuren SF, Viljoen AM. Plant-based antimicrobial studies – methods and approaches to study the interaction between natural products. Planta Med 2011; 77: 1168-1182