Frauenheilkunde up2date 2019; 13(01): 23-36
DOI: 10.1055/a-0662-0845
Gynäkologische Onkologie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Primäre Prävention – Mamma- und Genitalkarzinome

Caroline Preuß
,
Felix Heindl
,
Alexander Hein
,
Martin C. Koch
,
Paul Gaß
,
Matthias W. Beckmann
,
Michael P. Lux
,
Julius Emons
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 February 2019 (online)

In den letzten Jahren haben sich Diagnostik und Therapie im Bereich der gynäkologischen Onkologie und Senologie stetig weiterentwickelt. Dennoch ist das Versterben an einer Krebserkrankung in den hoch entwickelten Ländern eine der häufigsten Todesursachen der Frau [1]. Maßnahmen zur Primärprävention sind daher von hoher Bedeutung, um die Morbidität und Mortalität von Krebserkrankungen zu senken.

Kernaussagen
  • Ein Teil der gynäkologischen Krebserkrankungen wird von vermeidbaren Risikofaktoren gefördert. Hierzu gehören Infektionskrankheiten, Umweltfaktoren, schlecht eingestellter Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 und ein ungesunder Lebensstil, insbesondere Nikotin- und Alkoholkonsum, Adipositas, ungesunde Ernährung und geringe körperliche Aktivität.

  • Maßnahmen der Primärprävention können den Einfluss der modifizierbaren Risikofaktoren einschränken oder ganz unterbinden.

  • Für das Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinom wirken z. B. Schwangerschaft und Stillen protektiv. Bei positiver Familienanamnese sowie bei hohem Erkrankungsrisiko kann eine genetische Testung das Erkrankungsrisiko abklären mit entsprechenden Vorsorgemaßnahmen je nach Befund.

  • Beim Mammakarzinom wirkt bei hohem Risiko die Prävention mit Tamoxifen präventiv, beim Ovarialkarzinom eine Sterilisation mit Tubenligatur oder Salpingektomie.

  • Für das Endometriumkarzinom wirken neben den allgemeinen Maßnahmen zum Lebensstil auch Intrauterinpessare und orale Kontrazeptiva risikoreduzierend.

  • Die effektivste Maßnahme der Primärprävention für das Zervixkarzinom besteht in der Impfung gegen mehrere Varianten des humanen Papillomvirus (HPV), andernfalls der Gebrauch von Kondomen.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424 doi:10.3322/caac.21492
  • 2 Gredner T, Behrens G, Stock C. et al. Krebs durch Infektionen und ausgewählte Umweltfaktoren. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 586-593
  • 3 Behrens G, Gredner T, Stock C. et al. Krebs durch Übergewicht, geringe körperliche Aktivität und ungesunde Ernährung. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018; 115: 578-585
  • 4 WHO, EMRO. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention through population-based Interventions, including Action to address social Determinants and Health Inequity. Kairo: WHO – EMRO; 2018
  • 5 Robert-Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten 2017. Im Internet: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Krebsarten/Brustkrebs/brustkrebs.html Stand: 10.01.2019
  • 6 Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie AGO, Kommission Mamma. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Recommendations 2018. Im Internet: https://www.ago-online.de/fileadmin/downloads/leitlinien/mamma/2018-03/EN/Gesamt_PDF_Englisch/Updated_Guidelines_2018.pdf Stand 10.01.2019
  • 7 Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B. et al. Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 2016; 53: 465-471
  • 8 Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR. et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for brca1 and brca2 mutation carriers. JAMA 2017; 317: 2402-2416
  • 9 Rhiem K, Schmutzler R. Impact of prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Care (Basel) 2014; 9: 385-389
  • 10 Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT. et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1055-1062
  • 11 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, D.K., AWMF), S3-Leitlinie Früherkennung, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms. 2018. Version 4.1. Im Internet: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/mammakarzinom/ Stand 10.01.2019
  • 12 Kauff ND, Domchek SM, Friebel TM. et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: A multicenter, prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1331-1337
  • 13 Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Neuhausen SL. et al. Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 223-229
  • 14 Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P. et al. Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2328-2335
  • 15 Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF. et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 2010; 304: 967-975
  • 16 Finch AP, Lubinski J, Møller P. et al. Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 1547-1553
  • 17 Picon-Ruiz M, Morata-Tarifa C, Valle-Goffin JJ. et al. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 378-397
  • 18 Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M. et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 2008; 371: 569-578
  • 19 Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. The Nursesʼ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nature Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 388-396
  • 20 Benson JR, Jatoi I. Tailoring breast cancer therapies to reduce mortality and improve quality of life: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2017 (part 2). Future Oncol 2018; 14: 1893-1896
  • 21 Keum N, Greenwood DC, Lee DH. et al. Adult weight gain and adiposity-related cancers: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107: pii:djv088 doi:10.1093/jnci/djv088
  • 22 Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL. et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90: 1371-1388
  • 23 Zenda S, Yamaguchi T, Yokota T. et al. Topical steroid versus placebo for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: the study protocol of J-SUPPORT 1602 (TOPICS study), a randomized double-blinded phase 3 trial. BMC Cancer 2018; 18: 873
  • 24 Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA. et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women – Results from the MORE randomized trial. JAMA 1999; 281: 2189-2197
  • 25 Martín-Sánchez JC, Lunet N, González-Marrón A. et al. Projections in breast and lung cancer mortality among women: A Bayesian analysis of 52 countries worldwide. Cancer Res 2018; 78: 4436-4442
  • 26 Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE. et al. Exemestane for Breast-Cancer Prevention in Postmenopausal Women. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2381-2391
  • 27 Izumi H, Yamasaki A, Takeda K. et al. Acute-phase reaction induced by zoledronate and its effect on prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2018; 122: 200-205
  • 28 WHO. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Hormonal Contraception and Post-menopausal Hormonal Therapy. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer 1999; No. 72. Im Internet: https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono72.pdf Stand: 10.01.2019
  • 29 Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C. et al. Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet 2008; 371: 303-314
  • 30 Cibula D, Widschwendter M, Májek O. et al. Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 55-67
  • 31 Rice MS, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, unilateral oophorectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer in the Nursesʼ Health Studies. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 192-198.e3
  • 32 Rice MS, Murphy MA, Vitonis AF. et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and epithelial ovarian cancer in the New England Case-Control Study. Int J Cancer 2013; 133: 2415-2421
  • 33 Gaitskell K, Green J, Pirie K. et al. Tubal ligation and ovarian cancer risk in a large cohort: Substantial variation by histological type. Int J Cancer 2016; 138: 1076-1084
  • 34 Sieh W, Salvador S, McGuire V. et al. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42: 579-589
  • 35 Pölcher M, Hauptmann S, Fotopoulou C. et al. Should fallopian tubes be removed during hysterectomy procedures? – A statement by AGO Ovar. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 2015; 75: 339-341
  • 36 AWMF. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, D.K., AWMF), S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge maligner Ovarialtumoren. 2017. Langversion 2.0. Im Internet: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-035-OLl_Ovarialkarzinom_2017-11.pdf Stand: 12.01.2019
  • 37 Falconer H, Yin L, Grönberg H. et al. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 107: pii:dju410 doi:10.1093/jnci/dju410
  • 38 Pölcher M, Hauptmann S, Fotopoulou C. et al. Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 292: 231-234
  • 39 Anderson GL, Judd HL, Kaunitz AM. et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and associated diagnostic procedures: the Womenʼs Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 1739-1748
  • 40 Beral V. Million Women Study Collaborators, Bull D, Green J, Reeves G. Ovarian cancer and hormone replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2007; 369: 1703-1710
  • 41 Mørch LS, Løkkegaard E, Andreasen AH. et al. Hormone therapy and ovarian cancer. JAMA 2009; 302: 298-305
  • 42 Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian. Beral V, Gaitskell K, Hermon C. Menopausal hormone use and ovarian cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of 52 epidemiological studies. Lancet 2015; 385: 1835-1842
  • 43 Beavis AL, Smith AJ, Fader AN. Lifestyle changes and the risk of developing endometrial and ovarian cancers: opportunities for prevention and management. Int J Womens Health 2016; 8: 151-167
  • 44 Jordan SJ, Green AC, Whiteman DC. et al. Serous ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers: a comparative epidemiological analysis. Int J Cancer 2008; 122: 1598-1603
  • 45 Cetin I, Cozzi V, Antonazzo P. Infertility as a cancer risk factor – a review. Placenta 2008; 29 Suppl B: 169-177
  • 46 Leitzmann MF, Koebnick C, Danforth KN. et al. Body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer 2009; 115: 812-822
  • 47 Liu Z, Zhang TT, Zhao JJ. et al. The association between overweight, obesity and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 45: 1107-1115
  • 48 Bandera EV, Qin B, Moorman PG. et al. Obesity, weight gain, and ovarian cancer risk in African American women. Int J Cancer 2016; 139: 593-600
  • 49 Dixon SC, Nagle CM, Thrift AP. et al. Adult body mass index and risk of ovarian cancer by subtype: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol 2016; 45: 884-895
  • 50 Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I. et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC Womens Health 2014; 14: 150
  • 51 Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT, Neuhausen SL. et al. Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1616-1622
  • 52 Haber D. Prophylactic oophorectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian and breast cancer in carriers of BRCA mutations. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1660-1662
  • 53 Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J. et al. Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation. JAMA 2006; 296: 185-192
  • 54 Kotsopoulos J, Gronwald J, Karlan B. et al. Age-specific ovarian cancer risks among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150: 85-91
  • 55 Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I. et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC Womens Health 2014; 14: 150
  • 56 Barry JA, Azizia MM, Hardiman PJ. Risk of endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2014; 20: 748-758
  • 57 Beral V, Bull D, Reeves G. Endometrial cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 2005; 365: 1543-1551
  • 58 Allen NE, Tsilidis KK, Key TJ. et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of endometrial carcinoma among postmenopausal women in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 172: 1394-1403
  • 59 Razavi P, Pike MC, Horn-Ross PL. et al. Long-term postmenopausal hormone therapy and endometrial cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 475-483
  • 60 Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Sarto GE. et al. Continuous combined estrogen plus progestin and endometrial cancer: The Womenʼs Health Initiative Randomized Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108: pii:djv350 doi:10.1093/jnci/djv350
  • 61 Lacey jr. JV, Brinton LA, Lubin JH. et al. Endometrial carcinoma risks among menopausal estrogen plus progestin and unopposed estrogen users in a cohort of postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 1724-1731
  • 62 AWMF. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF), Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der Patientinnen mit Endometriumkarzinom. 2018. Langversion 1.0. Im Internet: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Endometriumkarzinom/LL_Endometriumkarzinom_Langversion_1.0.pdf Stand: 12.01.2019
  • 63 Nelson HD, Smith ME, Griffin JC. et al. Use of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 604-614
  • 64 Braithwaite RS, Chlebowski RT, Lau J. et al. Meta-analysis of vascular and neoplastic events associated with tamoxifen. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 937-947
  • 65 Al-Mubarak M, Tibau A, Templeton AJ. et al. Extended adjuvant tamoxifen for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e88238
  • 66 DeMichele A, Troxel AB, Berlin JA. et al. Impact of raloxifene or tamoxifen use on endometrial cancer risk: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4151-4159
  • 67 Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies on Endometrial Cancer. Endometrial cancer and oral contraceptives: an individual participant meta-analysis of 27 276 women with endometrial cancer from 36 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1061-1070
  • 68 Gierisch JM, Coeytaux RR, Urrutia RP. et al. Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast, cervical, colorectal, and endometrial cancers: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22: 1931-1943
  • 69 Parazzini F, Pelucchi C, Talamini R. et al. Use of fertility drugs and risk of endometrial cancer in an Italian case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2010; 19: 428-430
  • 70 Siristatidis C, Sergentanis TN, Kanavidis P. et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF: impact on ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2013; 19: 105-123
  • 71 Soini T, Hurskainen R, Grénman S. et al. Cancer risk in women using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in Finland. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (2 Pt 1): 292-299
  • 72 Felix AS, Gaudet MM, La Vecchia C. et al. Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: E410-22
  • 73 Win AK, Reece JC, Ryan S. Family history and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 89-98
  • 74 Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM. et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999; 189: 12-19
  • 75 Burchell AN, Winer RL, de Sanjosé S. et al. Chapter 6: Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of genital HPV infection. Vaccine 2006; 24 Suppl 3: S3/52-61
  • 76 Robert Koch-Institut. Epidemiologisches Bulletin Nr. 26. Berlin: RKI; 2018
  • 77 Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler CM. et al. Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-1255
  • 78 Smith JF, Brownlow M, Brown M. et al. Antibodies from women immunized with Gardasil cross-neutralize HPV 45 pseudovirions. Hum Vaccines 2007; 3: 109-115
  • 79 Gadducci A, Barsotti C, Cosio S. et al. Smoking habit, immune suppression, oral contraceptive use, and hormone replacement therapy use and cervical carcinogenesis: a review of the literature. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011; 27: 597-604
  • 80 Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S. et al. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14: 805-814
  • 81 Castellsagué X, Muñoz N. Chapter 3: Cofactors in human papillomavirus carcinogenesis–role of parity, oral contraceptives, and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003; 31: 20-28
  • 82 Jensen KE, Schmiedel S, Norrild B. et al. Parity as a cofactor for high-grade cervical disease among women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: a 13-year follow-up. Br J Cancer 2012; 108: 234-239
  • 83 Castle PE. How does tobacco smoke contribute to cervical carcinogenesis?. J Virol 2008; 82: 6084-6086
  • 84 International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Appleby P, Beral V, Berrington de González A. et al. Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1609-1621
  • 85 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, D.K., AWMF), S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge der Patientin mit Zervixkarzinom 2014. Langversion 1.0. Im Internet: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-033OLl_S3_Zervixkarzinom_2014-10.pdf Stand: 12.01.2019