Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0799-9670
Pseudodonesis and Image Vibration after Phacoemulsification: A New Non-Refractive Subjective Visual Complication in Post-Cataract Patients
Pseudodonesis und Bildvibration nach Phakoemulsifikation: eine neue nicht refraktive subjektive visuelle Komplikation bei PostkataraktpatientenPublication History
received 15 September 2018
accepted 28 October 2018
Publication Date:
07 January 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/klimo/201904/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-0799-9670_klm0052-1.jpg)
Background
Age-related cataract is the leading cause of visual impairment worldwide [1], accounting for 50% of blindness globally [2]. With an estimated 19.5 million procedures carried out in 2011 [3], cataract surgery is the most common ophthalmic surgical procedure. The past half-century has seen dramatic changes in the surgical techniques, which have translated to improvements in outcomes and safety [4]. Phacoemulsification (ultrasound) lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation was introduced 40 years ago and is now the standard method of cataract surgery in higher-income countries [5].
Dysphotopsiae are visual disturbances reported in up to 1 in 10 patients with uncomplicated cataract surgery and monofocal intraocular pressure (IOL) implantation [6]. Patients complain of dark shadows (dark dysphotopsia) or scintillations, haloes, peripheral or central flaring, or flashes (positive dysphotopsia). The improvement and adaptation to these symptoms may require several months without complete resolution and have a negative impact in the quality of life of a patient with an otherwise uncomplicated surgical procedure. Here we report the case of a bilateral pseudodonesis causing visual impairment as a new non-refractive, subjective visual complaint in a post-cataract patient.
-
References
- 1 Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262-267
- 2 World Health Organization. World Health Organization Executive Board. Prevention of Avoidable Blindness and Visual Impairment. In: Executive Board 117th Session, EB117/35 22; 2005. Available at: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/EB117/B117_35-en.pdf Accessed 01.06.2018
- 3 Lawless M, Hodge C. Femtosecond laser cataract surgery: an experience from Australia. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2012; 1: 5-10
- 4 Riaz Y, Mehta JS, Wormald R. et al. Surgical interventions for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (04) CD001323
- 5 Day AC, Donachie PHJ, Sparrow JM. et al. The Royal College of Ophthalmologistsʼ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond) 2015; 29: 552-560
- 6 Bowling B. Kanskiʼs clinical Ophthalmology: A systematic Approach. 8th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2015
- 7 Brogan K, Diaper CJM, Rotchford AP. Cataract surgery refractive outcomes: representative standards in a National Health Service setting. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312209.
- 8 Schwiegerling J. Recent developments in pseudophakic dysphotopsia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 27-30
- 9 Piovella M, Colonval S, Kapp A. et al. Patient outcomes following implantation with a trifocal toric IOL: twelve-month prospective multicentre study. Eye (Lond) 2018; DOI: 10.1038/s41433-018-0076-5.
- 10 Hu J, Sella R, Afshari NA. Dysphotopsia: a multifaceted optic phenomenon. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018; 29: 61-68