Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-0831-6696
Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on bone and body composition
Auswirkungen der postmenopausalen Hormontherapie auf Knochen und KörperzusammensetzungPublication History
09 January 2019
10 January 2019
Publication Date:
24 May 2019 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Die Wechseljahre sind durch tiefgreifende klinische und hormonelle Veränderungen gekennzeichnet. Ein Östrogenmangel führt zu einem beschleunigten Knochenverlust und erhöhtem Frakturrisiko. Parallel dazu deuten Verlaufs-Studien auf einen Anstieg der Adipositas mit einer Neigung zu mehr zentralem Fett sowie einen Verlust an Muskelmasse hin. Die post-menopausale Hormontherapie (MHT), die derzeit auf die symptomatische Linderung von Hitzewallungen und andere klimakterische Symptome beschränkt ist, hat sich als wirksam erwiesen, um die Knochendichte zu erhalten. Jüngste Daten der OsteoLaus-Kohorte, einer bevölkerungsbasierten Studie mit postmenopausalen Frauen im Alter von 50–80 Jahren, deuten darauf hin, dass zusätzlich ein günstiger Effekt auf die Mikroarchitektur der Knochen vermittelt wird. Darüber hinaus haben Frauen unter MHT, weniger androides und viszerales Fett, entsprechend der verfügbaren Daten aus anderen Studien. Die Physiopathologie dieses Zusammenhangs ist nicht vollständig geklärt und kann Änderungen des Energieverbrauchs durch Östrogene betreffen. Im Gegenteil scheint die Wirkung der MHT auf die Magermasse begrenzter zu sein und könnte mit spezifischen Arten MHT oder dem zeitlichen Einsatz der MHT in Verbindung gebracht werden. Interessanterweise ist die Entwicklung nach dem MHT-Entzug in verschiedenen Geweben nicht identisch, wobei der Verlust des Nutzens für das Fettgewebe schneller eintritt. In Anbetracht des erneuten Interesses von MHT, zumindest für Frauen in der frühen Postmenopause, können diese Daten bei der Erwägung einer MHT wertvoll sein.
Abstract
Menopause is characterized by profound clinical and hormonal changes. Estrogen deficiency leads to accelerated bone loss and increased risk of fracture. In parallel, longitudinal studies suggest a gain of adiposity with propensity for more central fat, as well as a loss of lean mass. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), currently limited for symptomatic relief of hot flushes and other climacteric symptoms, has shown proved efficacy to preserve bone mineral density. Recent data of the OsteoLaus cohort, a population-based study of postmenopausal women aged 50–80 years, indicate that additional bone benefits are mediated by a favorable effect on bone microarchitecture. In addition, women on MHT exhibit less an droid and visceral fat, in accordance with the review of the available evidence from other studies. The physiopathology of this link is not utterly elucidated and may implicate changes of energy expenditure by estrogens. On the contrary, the effect of MHT for lean mass seem to be more limited and may be associated with specific types of MHT or a particular timing of administration. Interestingly, the evolution after MHT withdrawal is not identical across different tissues with more rapid loss of the adipose benefits.In view of the renewed interest of MHT at least for early post-menopausal women, these data can be valuable assets when considering such treatment.
-
References
- 1 Burger HG, Dudley EC, Hopper JL. et al. The endocrinology of the menopausal transition: a cross-sectional study of a population-based sample. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80: 3537-3545 doi:10.1210/jcem.80.12.8530596
- 2 Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE. et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 843-851 doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.128
- 3 Politi MC, Schleinitz MD, Col NF. Revisiting the duration of vasomotor symptoms of menopause: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 1507-1513 doi:10.1007/s11606–008-0655–4
- 4 Greendale GA, Sowers M, Han W. et al. Bone mineral density loss in relation to the final menstrual period in a multiethnic cohort: results from the Study of Women‘s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27: 111-118 doi:10.1002/jbmr.534
- 5 Lovejoy JC, Champagne CM, de Jonge L. et al. Increased visceral fat and decreased energy expenditure during the menopausal transition. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32: 949-958 doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.25
- 6 Wing RR, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. et al. Weight gain at the time of menopause. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 97-102
- 7 Baber RJ, Panay N, Fenton A. et al. 2016 IMS Recommendations on women‘s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy. Climacteric 2016; 19: 109-150 doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1129166
- 8 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL. et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women‘s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321-333
- 9 Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR. et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women‘s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1701-1712 doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1701
- 10 Rossouw JE, Prentice RL, Manson JE. et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease by age and years since menopause. JAMA 2007; 297: 1465-1477 doi:10.1001/jama.297.13.1465
- 11 Roehm E. A Reappraisal of Women‘s Health Initiative Estrogen-Alone Trial: Long-Term Outcomes in Women 50–59 Years of Age. Obstet Gynecol Int 2015; 2015: 713295 doi:10.1155/2015/713295
- 12 Lobo RA. Where are we 10 years after the Women‘s Health Initiative?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 1771-1780 doi:10.1210/jc.2012–4070
- 13 Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW. et al. Vascular Effects of Early versus Late Postmenopausal Treatment with Estradiol. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1221-1231 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1505241
- 14 The NHTPSAP. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2017; 24: 728-753 doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000000921
- 15 Shevroja E, Marques-Vidal P, Aubry-Rozier B. et al. Cohort profile: The OsteoLaus study. Int J Epidemiol; 2018 doi:10.1093/ije/dyy276. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy276
- 16 Firmann M, Mayor V, Vidal PM. et al. The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2008; 8: 6 doi:10.1186/1471–2261-8–6
- 17 Genant HK, Li J, Wu CY. et al. Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment. J Clin Densitom 2000; 3: 281-290
- 18 Papadakis GE, Hans D, Rodriguez EG. et al. Menopausal Hormone Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Total and Visceral Adiposity: The OsteoLaus Cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103: 1948-1957 doi:10.1210/jc.2017–02449
- 19 Bernstein M, Sloutskis D, Kumanyika S. et al. Data-based approach for developing a physical activity frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 147-154
- 20 Nelson HD, Humphrey LL, Nygren P. et al. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: scientific review. JAMA 2002; 288: 872-881
- 21 Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z. et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women‘s Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 1729-1738 doi:10.1001/jama.290.13.1729
- 22 Jackson RD, Wactawski-Wende J, LaCroix AZ. et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogen on risk of fractures and BMD in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: results from the women‘s health initiative randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 817-828 doi:10.1359/jbmr.060312
- 23 Brown S. Shock, terror and controversy: how the media reacted to the Women‘s Health Initiative. Climacteric 2012; 15: 275-280 doi:10.3109/13697137.2012.660048
- 24 Parente L, Uyehara C, Larsen W. et al. Long-term impact of the women‘s health initiative on HRT. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008; 277: 219-224 doi:10.1007/s00404–007-0442–1
- 25 Silva BC, Leslie WD, Resch H. et al. Trabecular bone score: a noninvasive analytical method based upon the DXA image. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29: 518-530 doi:10.1002/jbmr.2176
- 26 Papadakis G, Hans D, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E. et al. The Benefit of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Bone Density and Microarchitecture Persists After its Withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101: 5004-5011 doi:10.1210/jc.2016–2695
- 27 Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK. et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 972-980 doi:10.1210/jc.2010–1502
- 28 Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Makras P. et al. Clinical Features of 24 Patients With Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: Systematic Review and Additional Cases. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32: 1291-1296 doi:10.1002/jbmr.3110
- 29 Lamy O, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Stoll D. et al. Severe Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures After Denosumab Discontinuation: 9 Clinical Cases Report. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102: 354-358 doi:10.1210/jc.2016–3170
- 30 Greenspan SL, Emkey RD, Bone HG. et al. Significant differential effects of alendronate, estrogen, or combination therapy on the rate of bone loss after discontinuation of treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 875-883
- 31 Wasnich RD, Bagger YZ, Hosking DJ. et al. Changes in bone density and turnover after alendronate or estrogen withdrawal. Menopause 2004; 11: 622-630
- 32 Bagger YZ, Tanko LB, Alexandersen P. et al. Two to three years of hormone replacement treatment in healthy women have long-term preventive effects on bone mass and osteoporotic fractures: the PERF study. Bone 2004; 34: 728-735 doi:10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.021
- 33 Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Ribot C. Withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy is associated with significant vertebral bone loss in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 385-390 doi:10.1007/s001980170107
- 34 Heiss G, Wallace R, Anderson GL. et al. Health risks and benefits 3 years after stopping randomized treatment with estrogen and progestin. JAMA 2008; 299: 1036-1045 doi:10.1001/jama.299.9.1036
- 35 NICE guidelines National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Menopause: diagnosis and management of menopause. 2015 doi:www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng23
- 36 Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Ribot CA. Relative influence of age and menopause on total and regional body composition changes in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1594-1600
- 37 Abdulnour J, Doucet E, Brochu M. et al. The effect of the menopausal transition on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors: a Montreal-Ottawa New Emerging Team group study. Menopause 2012; 19: 760-767 doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318240f6f3
- 38 Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Christiansen C. Age- and menopause-associated variations in body composition and fat distribution in healthy women as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Metabolism 1995; 44: 369-373
- 39 Heine PA, Taylor JA, Iwamoto GA. et al. Increased adipose tissue in male and female estrogen receptor-alpha knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 12729-12734 doi:10.1073/pnas.97.23.12729
- 40 Rogers NH, Perfield JW 2nd, Strissel KJ. et al. Reduced energy expenditure and increased inflammation are early events in the development of ovariectomy-induced obesity. Endocrinology 2009; 150: 2161-2168 doi:10.1210/en.2008–1405
- 41 Van Pelt RE, Gavin KM, Kohrt WM. Regulation of Body Composition and Bioenergetics by Estrogens. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2015; 44: 663-676 doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2015.05.011
- 42 Duval K, Prud'homme D, Rabasa-Lhoret R. et al. Effects of the menopausal transition on energy expenditure: a MONET Group Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 407-411 doi:10.1038/ejcn.2013.33
- 43 Santen RJ, Allred DC, Ardoin SP. et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: s1-s66 doi:10.1210/jc.2009–2509
- 44 Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Ormiston TM. et al. Meta-analysis: effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Obes Metab 2006; 8: 538-554 doi:10.1111/j.1463–1326.2005.00545.x
- 45 Micklesfield LK, Goedecke JH, Punyanitya M. et al. Dual-energy X-ray performs as well as clinical computed tomography for the measurement of visceral fat. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012; 20: 1109-1114 doi:10.1038/oby.2011.367
- 46 Wajchenberg BL. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: their relation to the metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev 2000; 21: 697-738 doi:10.1210/edrv.21.6.0415
- 47 Zhang P, Peterson M, Su GL. et al. Visceral adiposity is negatively associated with bone density and muscle attenuation. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 101: 337-343 doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.081778
- 48 Shea KL, Gavin KM, Melanson EL. et al. Body composition and bone mineral density after ovarian hormone suppression with or without estradiol treatment. Menopause 2015; 22: 1045-1052 doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000000430
- 49 Arabi A, Garnero P, Porcher R. et al. Changes in body composition during post-menopausal hormone therapy: a 2 year prospective study. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1747-1752
- 50 Chen Z, Bassford T, Green SB. et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and body composition--a substudy of the estrogen plus progestin trial of the Women‘s Health Initiative. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 651-656 doi:10.1093/ajcn.82.3.651
- 51 Bea JW, Zhao Q, Cauley JA. et al. Effect of hormone therapy on lean body mass, falls, and fractures: 6-year results from the Women‘s Health Initiative hormone trials. Menopause 2011; 18: 44-52 doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e3181e3aab1
- 52 Yamasaki H, Douchi T, Yamamoto S. et al. Body fat distribution and body composition during GnRH agonist therapy. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 338-342
- 53 Haarbo J, Marslew U, Gotfredsen A. et al. Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy prevents central distribution of body fat after menopause. Metabolism 1991; 40: 1323-1326
- 54 Espeland MA, Stefanick ML, Kritz-Silverstein D. et al. Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on body weight and waist and hip girths. Postmenopausal Estrogen-Progestin Interventions Study Investigators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82: 1549-1556 doi:10.1210/jcem.82.5.3925
- 55 Hanggi W, Lippuner K, Jaeger P. et al. Differential impact of conventional oral or transdermal hormone replacement therapy or tibolone on body composition in postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1998; 48: 691-699
- 56 Sorensen MB, Rosenfalck AM, Hojgaard L. et al. Obesity and sarcopenia after menopause are reversed by sex hormone replacement therapy. Obes Res 2001; 9: 622-626 doi:10.1038/oby.2001.81
- 57 Gambacciani M, Ciaponi M, Cappagli B. et al. Prospective evaluation of body weight and body fat distribution in early postmenopausal women with and without hormonal replacement therapy. Maturitas 2001; 39: 125-132
- 58 Mattiasson I, Rendell M, Tornquist C. et al. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on abdominal fat compartments as related to glucose and lipid metabolism in early postmenopausal women. Horm Metab Res 2002; 34: 583-588 doi:10.1055/s-2002–35420
- 59 Jensen LB, Vestergaard P, Hermann AP. et al. Hormone replacement therapy dissociates fat mass and bone mass, and tends to reduce weight gain in early postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled 5-year clinical trial of the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 333-342 doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.333
- 60 Sumino H, Ichikawa S, Yoshida A. et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy on weight, abdominal fat distribution, and lipid levels in Japanese postmenopausal women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 1044-1051 doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802371
- 61 Sites CK, L‘Hommedieu GD, Toth MJ. et al. The effect of hormone replacement therapy on body composition, body fat distribution, and insulin sensitivity in menopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90: 2701-2707 doi:10.1210/jc.2004–1479
- 62 Thorneycroft IH, Lindsay R, Pickar JH. Body composition during treatment with conjugated estrogens with and without medroxyprogesterone acetate: analysis of the women‘s Health, Osteoporosis, Progestin, Estrogen (HOPE) trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 137 e131-137 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.042