Association between Cervical Spine Degeneration and the Presence of Dens Fractures

Marcel Betsch; Sabina Blizzard; Bala Krishnamoorthy; Jung Yoo

doi:10.1055/a-0853-8046

Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Table of Contents

Z Orthop Unfall 2020; 158(01): 46-50
DOI: 10.1055/a-0853-8046

Originalarbeit

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Association between Cervical Spine Degeneration and the Presence of Dens Fractures

Zusammenhang zwischen der Degeneration der Halswirbelsäule und dem Vorhandensein von Dens-Frakturen

Marcel Betsch

¹Department of Orthopaedics, Universitätsklinikum Aachen

,

Sabina Blizzard

²Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

,

Bala Krishnamoorthy

³Department of Mathematics, Washington State University – Vancouver, Washington, United States

,

Jung Yoo

²Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose Results of a small case series indicate an increased risk of dens fractures in patients with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the relative risks associated with degeneration of the cervical spine in the occurrence of dens fractures in older patients.

Methods We performed a retrospective CT study of 1,794 patients > 55 years of age with and without dens fractures for signs of osteoarthritis (OA).

Results OA of the atlanto-dens interval (AdI) was present in 75.9% of fracture patients, whereas 63.5% of non-fracture patients had OA of the AdI (p = 0.04). In cases of osteoarthritis of the facet joints, we did find a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the dens fracture risk in patients with OA.

Conclusions This study indicates an association between OA of the cervical spine and the risk of sustaining a dens fracture. OA can lead to a reduction in the range of motion of the cervical spine. As a consequence, a relatively low-energy trauma can induce a forced sagittal motion, which will produce a torque at the base of the odontoid process resulting in a fracture.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Die Ergebnisse bisher veröffentlichter kleiner Fallserien zeigen ein erhöhtes Risiko für Densfrakturen bei Patienten mit Arthrose der HWS. Ziel dieser retrospektiven Kohortenstudie war die Untersuchung des relativen Risikos, das mit der Degeneration der Halswirbelsäule beim Auftreten von Densitätsfrakturen bei älteren Patienten verbunden ist.

Methoden Wir untersuchten im Rahmen einer retrospektiven CT-Studie 1.794 Patienten auf Arthrosezeichen (OA) der HWS im Alter von über 55 Jahren mit und ohne Densfrakturen.

Ergebnisse Bei 75,9% der Frakturpatienten lag eine OA des Atlanto-Dentalen-Intervalls (AdI) vor, während 63,5% der Patienten ohne Fraktur eine OA der AdI aufwiesen (p = 0,04). Bei Arthrose der Facettengelenke wurde ein signifikanter Anstieg (p < 0,05) des Densefrakturrisikos bei OA-Patienten festgestellt.

Diskussion Diese Studie weist auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen OA der Halswirbelsäule und dem Risiko einer Densfraktur hin. OA kann zu einer Verringerung der Beweglichkeit der Halswirbelsäule führen. Infolgedessen kann ein bereits relativ energiearmes Trauma an der Basis des Dens zu einem Drehmoment führen, das zu einem Bruch führen kann.

Key words

osteoarthritis - cervical spine degeneration - dens fractures - odontoid process

Schlüsselwörter

Arthrose - Verschleiß - Halswirbelsäule - Densfrakturen - Densfortsatz

Full Text

References

References
1 Watanabe M, Sakai D, Yamamoto Y. et al. Upper cervical spine injuries: age-specific clinical features. J Orthop Sci 2010; 15: 485-492 doi:10.1007/s00776-010-1493-x
2 Kiwerski JE. Injuries to the spinal cord in elderly patients. Injury 1992; 23: 397-400
3 Lomoschitz FM, Blackmore CC, Mirza SK. et al. Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 years old and older: epidemiologic analysis regarding the effects of age and injury mechanism on distribution, type, and stability of injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 573-577 doi:10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780573
4 Olerud C, Andersson S, Svensson B. et al. Cervical spine fractures in the elderly: factors influencing survival in 65 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 509-513
5 Butler JS, Dolan RT, Burbridge M. et al. The long-term functional outcome of type II odontoid fractures managed non-operatively. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 1635-1642 doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1391-0
6 Grauer JN, Shafi B, Hilibrand AS. et al. Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures. Spine J 2005; 5: 123-129 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.014 S1529-9430(04)00920-9 [pii]
7 Hsu WK, Anderson PA. Odontoid fractures: update on management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18: 383-394 18/7/383 [pii]
8 Damadi AA, Saxe AW, Fath JJ. et al. Cervical spine fractures in patients 65 years or older: a 3-year experience at a level I trauma center. J Trauma 2008; 64: 745-748.00005373-200803000-00025 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3180341fc6 00005373-200803000-00025 [pii]
9 Malik SA, Murphy M, Connolly P. et al. Evaluation of morbidity, mortality and outcome following cervical spine injuries in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 585-591 doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0603-3
10 Lakshmanan P, Jones A, Howes J. et al. CT evaluation of the pattern of odontoid fractures in the elderly–relationship to upper cervical spine osteoarthritis. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 78-83 doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0743-z
11 Betsch MW, Blizzard SR, Shinseki MS. et al. Prevalence of degenerative changes of the atlanto-axial joints. Spine J 2015; 15: 275-280 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.011
12 Burgers CJC, Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press; 1998
13 Arlot S, Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 2010; 4: 40-79
14 Anderson LD, DʼAlonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974; 56: 1663-1674
15 Amling M, Hahn M, Wening VJ. et al. The microarchitecture of the axis as the predisposing factor for fracture of the base of the odontoid process. A histomorphometric analysis of twenty-two autopsy specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 1840-1846
16 Amling M, Posl M, Wening VJ. et al. Structural heterogeneity within the axis: the main cause in the etiology of dens fractures. A histomorphometric analysis of 37 normal and osteoporotic autopsy cases. J Neurosurg 1995; 83: 330-335 doi:10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0330
17 Muller EJ, Wick M, Russe O. et al. Management of odontoid fractures in the elderly. Eur Spine J 1999; 8: 360-365 90080360.586 [pii]
18 Badve SA, Bhojraj S, Nene A. et al. Occipito-atlanto-axial osteoarthritis: a cross sectional clinico-radiological prevalence study in high risk and general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 434-438 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b13320
19 Genez BM, Willis JJ, Lowrey CE. et al. CT findings of degenerative arthritis of the atlantoodontoid joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 315-318 doi:10.2214/ajr.154.2.2105022
20 Zapletal J, Hekster RE, Straver JS. et al. Atlanto-odontoid osteoarthritis. Appearance and prevalence at computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 49-53
21 Friedenberg ZB, Miller WT. Degenerative Disc Disease of the Cervical Spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963; 45: 1171-1178
22 Lestini WF, Wiesel SW. The pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 69-93
23 Shinseki MS, Zusman NL, Hiratzka J. et al. Association between advanced degenerative changes of the atlanto-dens joint and presence of dens fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 712-717 doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00814 1864379 [pii]